BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de Le�n, Chair


          SB 735 (Wolk) - Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009:  
          multispecies conservation plans.
          
          Amended: April 24, 2013         Policy Vote: NR&W 7-2
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: May 23, 2013      Consultant: Marie Liu
          
          SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.


          Bill Summary: SB 735 would require the Delta Stewardship Council  
          (council), the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), and  
          specified local governments to enter into a written agreement by  
          January 1, 2015 on how to ensure that current and future  
          multispecies conservation plans and the Delta Plan are  
          consistent with each other.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              One-time costs of $50,000 to $70,000 from the General Fund  
              for additional workload for the council.
              One-time costs of $50,000 to $70,000 from the Fish and Game  
              Preservation Fund (special fund) for additional workload for  
              DFW.

          Background: The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009  
          (act) established council and required the council to develop  
          and adopt a Delta Plan to achieve the co-equal goals of  
          providing a more reliable water supply for California and  
          protecting, restoring, and enhancing the Delta ecosystem. The  
          Delta Plan is scheduled to be adopted in May 2013. The act  
          requires all plans, programs, or projects that have the  
          potential to have greater impacts in the Delta to be consistent  
          with the Delta Plan. 

          Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community  
          Conservation Plans (NCCPs) are landscape level multi-species  
          plans that are authorized and permitted pursuant to the federal  
          Endangered Species Act, the California Endangered Species Act,  
          and the state Natural Community Conservation Planning Act. NCCPs  
          and HCPs take a broad-based ecosystem approach to planning for  
          the protection and perpetuation of biological diversity while  
          allowing for the incidental take of endangered species in the  








          SB 735 (Wolk)
          Page 1


          course of otherwise legal activities, such as land development  
          projects. 

          Proposed Law: This bill would require the council, DFW, Contra  
          Costa County, Sacramento County, Solano County, the Yolo County  
          Habitat/Natural Community Conservation Plan Joint Powers Agency,  
          and the San Joaquin Council of Governments to enter into a  
          written agreement by January 1, 2015 that would describe how the  
          parties would ensure that adopted and future multispecies  
          conservation plans are consistent with the Delta Plan and vice  
          versa. The council would be required to invite and encourage  
          participation from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

          Staff Comments: While the council and DFW would likely have to  
          resolve the consistency issues with current and future NCCPs and  
          HCPs in order for the Delta Plan to be effective, this bill  
          would make an explicit requirement for this work. By requiring  
          an written agreement to be entered into by January 1, 2015, this  
          bill also likely expedites these discussions. The council  
          estimates that this bill's requirements would result in an  
          500-700 hours of staff time at a cost of $50,000 to $70,000.  
          Staff estimates a similar workload demand on DFW.
          
          As this bill requires actions by local governments, the costs to  
          local governments to comply with the mandates under this bill  
          may be reimbursable upon a determination by the Commission on  
          State Mandates. If the five local governments in this bill have  
          similar costs as the state agencies, this bill could result  
          $250,000 in reimbursements.

          Staff notes that the Delta Plan and affected existing NCCPs and  
          HCPs may need to be modified as a result of the agreement  
          reached, thus causing additional costs to the agencies. Arguably  
          these revision costs would need to be done regardless of the  
          outcome of this bill in order to achieve the co-equal goals.  
          This bill also does not pose any specific requirements or  
          deadlines for such revisions and so plan revision costs are not  
          attributable to this bill.

          Proposed Author Amendments: Eliminate the requirement for local  
          agencies to enter into the formal agreements.











          SB 735 (Wolk)
          Page 2