BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �




                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page A

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 744 (Lara)
          As Amended  September 3, 2013
          Majority vote

           SENATE VOTE  :27-11  
           
           EDUCATION           6-0         APPROPRIATIONS      12-4        
           
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Buchanan, Ch�vez,         |Ayes:|Gatto, Bocanegra,         |
          |     |Gonzalez, Nazarian,       |     |Bradford,                 |
          |     |Weber, Williams           |     |Ian Calderon, Campos,     |
          |     |                          |     |Eggman, Gomez, Hall,      |
          |     |                          |     |Holden, Pan, Quirk, Weber |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Harkey, Bigelow,          |
          |     |                          |     |Donnelly, Wagner          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          SUMMARY  :  Amends the process for referral to and programs  
          offered within county community schools and community day  
          schools.  Specifically,  this bill  :   


          1)Prohibits a school district from referring a pupil for  
            placement in a community school unless the school district, in  
            consultation with the community school, determines the  
            community school has space available for that pupil's  
            enrollment.


          2)Prohibits a school district from referring a pupil for  
            placement in a county community school unless the educational  
            needs of the pupil, as determined by the school district and  
            county office of education, can be met in the county community  
            school.


          3)Requires the school attendance review board, or other  
            district-level referral body, to include a placement option  
            for the pupil that is geographically accessible to the him or  









                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page B

            her if the pupil is referred for  placement in a county  
            community school that is not geographically accessible to the  
            pupil.


          4)Prohibits a school district from referring a pupil for  
            placement in a county community school if the parent or  
            guardian of the pupil objects to the referral.


          5)Restricts the time period for which a pupil can remain in a  
            county community school by specifying that the pupil has the  
            right to return to his or her prior school or another  
            appropriate school within his or her school district at the  
            end of the semester following the semester when the act  
            leading to the referral occurred, regardless of whether the  
            pupil is successful at the county community school.


          6)Removes from the list of eligible pupils for referral to a  
            county community school, those pupils who are dependent  
            children of the juvenile courts, pursuant to Section 300 of  
            the Welfare and Institutions Code.


          7)Specifies that the appropriateness of placing a child in a  
            county community school may be examined in the judicial  
            hearing in which the placement is made or concerns of the  
            placement are raised.


          8)Specifies that placement in a county community school shall be  
            in accordance with exiting law that prohibits a school  
            district from denying a pupil enrollment or readmission to a  
            public school based on his or her contact with the juvenile  
            justice system. 


          9)Prohibits a school district from denying readmission to the  
            school district of residence based on the pupil's failure to  
            comply with any additionally imposed criteria beyond the terms  
            of the initial order or any subsequent order to expel.











                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page C

          10)Prohibits a school district from imposing any additional  
            academic or behavioral criteria or conditions that would  
            extend the duration of the placement of a pupil in a county  
            community school beyond the terms of the initial order or any  
            subsequent order to expel.


          11)Requires a school district to identify the services or  
            programs that best address the student's needs if included in  
            a student's readmission plan, including, for example,  
            substance treatment programs and, recognizing those pupils who  
            are unable to access services or programs due to circumstances  
            beyond their control such as financial hardship or geographic  
            inaccessibility of the program or service location, prohibits  
            a school district from denying a pupil readmission to the  
            district based solely on his or her failure to meet a the  
            service or program requirement of his or her rehabilitation  
            plan if that failure was due to circumstances beyond his or  
            her control.  

          12)Specifies that independent study programs offered through  
            county community day schools shall be in accordance with all  
            other laws governing independent study programs.


          13)Encourages county community day schools to include in their  
            instructional programs school credit recovery assistance and  
            tutorial assistance.


          14)Requires county boards of education operating county  
            community schools to ensure that assessments in all areas of  
            suspected disability and appropriate services and programs  
            specified in a pupil's individualized education program are  
            provided in compliance with existing state and federal law.


          15)Requires county boards of education operating county  
            community schools to ensure that appropriate services and  
            programs designed to address the language needs of pupils  
            identified as English learners are provided in compliance with  
            all applicable state and federal laws.











                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page D

          16)Specifies the intent of the Legislature that if an  
            individualized assessment shows that the pupil requires  
            additional educational services, supports, such as mental  
            health counseling, or classes, that are not available at the  
            community day school, the parent, guardian, or responsible  
            adult of the pupil, or the probation officer as appropriate,  
            should be informed. 


          17)Specifies the circumstances under which a pupil may be  
            involuntarily transferred to a county community school.


          18)Repeals language relating to enrollment of homeless children  
            and youth in county community schools.


          19)Reiterates existing provisions of the Welfare and  
            Institutions Code for the placements of pupils who are on  
            probation or are under the supervision of a probation officer.


          20)Extends procedures established under the California Rules of  
            Court as they relate to the rights of children in a judicial  
            proceeding to the placement of a pupil in an alternative  
            setting by a probation officer.


          21)Makes technical and non-substantive changes to these  
            sections.


           FISCAL EFFECT :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, there is the potential for one-time state  
          reimbursable mandated General Fund/Proposition 98 costs, likely  
          less than $350,000, to school districts and County Offices of  
          Education to meet the requirements of this bill.  The majority  
          of the requirements in this bill are clarifying, to provide a  
          nexus between pupils being adjudicated in a court and their  
          educational placement decisions.  However, to the extent school  
          districts and County Offices of Education need to alter their  
          current pupil referral processes, costs will be incurred.  

           COMMENTS  :  California authorizes three types of alternative  









                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page E

          schools that are targeted primarily at high school students:   
          continuation schools, county community schools, and community  
          day schools.  In addition, California permits districts to  
          operate independent study programs for high school students as  
          an alternative to regular attendance at a comprehensive high  
          school or alternative school.  These four options constitute the  
          range of alternatives used by most districts.<1> 


           Alternative Education Settings  :  According to the author, this  
          bill is needed to address the involuntarily transfer of students  
          to an alternative setting without due process, without ensuring  
          that a parent or guardian's right to choose a school for their  
          child is protected, and with minimal consideration around the  
          placement's educational fit for the student.  Again according to  
          the author, these issues disproportionally affect low-income  
          students and students of color who make-up a majority of the  
          schools' populations.  2012-2013 enrollment numbers show  
          African-American and Latino youth comprise 68% of total county  
          community school enrollment and 82% of community day school  
          enrollment.  This bill addresses three of these educational  
          settings: county community schools, community day schools, and  
          independent study programs.   



           1)County community schools are public schools that are run by  
            county offices of education.  They educate students in  
            kindergarten through grade twelve who are expelled from school  
            or who are referred because of attendance or behavior  
            problems.  They also serve students who are homeless, on  
            probation or parole, and who are not attending any school.   
            Parents or guardians also may request that their child attend  
            a county community school.  These schools aim to meet  
            individual student needs.  Students learn academic and life  
            skills.  Although students may graduate from county community  
            schools, the goal of these schools is to help students  
            re-enroll in traditional education settings and move to other  
            levels of education, training, or employment.





          ---------------------------
          <1> Improving Alternative Education in California; Legislative  
          Analyst's Office, February 2007.








                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page F

          2)Community day schools are schools for students who have been  
            expelled from school or who have had problems with attendance  
            or behavior.  They are run by school districts or county  
            offices of education.  The 360-minute minimum instructional  
            day includes academic programs that provide challenging  
            curriculum and individual attention to student learning  
            modalities and abilities.  Community day schools are intended  
            to have low student-teacher ratios.  Students benefit from  
            learning support services that include school counselors and  
            psychologists, academic and vocational counselors, and pupil  
            discipline personnel.  Students also receive collaborative  
            services from county offices of education, law enforcement,  
            probation, and human services agency personnel who work with  
            at-risk youth.



          3)Independent study is provided as an alternative instructional  
            strategy, not an alternative curriculum.  Independent study  
            students work independently, according to a written agreement  
            and under the general supervision of a credentialed teacher or  
            teachers.  While independent study students follow the  
            district-adopted curriculum and meet the district graduation  
            requirements, independent study offers flexibility to meet  
            individual student needs, interests, and styles of learning.   
            These programs are offered by school districts, charter  
            schools, and county offices of education.


           Placement in an Alternative Education Setting  :  Current law  
          permits a pupil to be involuntarily enrolled in a county  
          community school or community day school due to expulsion or  
          referred by court order (both without parental consent), or  
          involuntarily enrolled in a community day school due to  
          expulsion or referral by court order or a school attendance  
          review board (SARB) (all without parental consent).   
           
          This bill would prohibit a school district from placing a pupil  
          in a county community school unless the district first  
          determines that the county community school has space available  
          to enroll the pupil, the county community school meets the  
          educational needs of the pupils, the pupil does not incur  
          transportation costs above and beyond those necessary to attend  
          his or her prior school of residence, and the parent or guardian  









                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page G

          has not expressly objected to the referral.  These provisions  
          are intended to prevent an inappropriate placement of a pupil in  
          an educational setting that is not going to best serve the needs  
          of the pupil.

           Readmission  :  This bill specifies that if a pupil is  
          involuntarily placed in either a county community or community  
          day school, the pupil has the right to reenroll in his or her  
          former school or another appropriate school immediately after  
          readmission from the expulsion order or court-ordered placement.  
           This bill also specifies that the school district has the  
          discretion to place the pupil in the most appropriate setting,  
          whether the pupil's prior school or another comprehensive school  
          of the district.  The school district may also recommend  
          continued placement in a community day school, but this  
          recommendation may be rejected by the parent and his/her pupil.   
          This language will allow the school district to fulfill its  
          obligation to ensure the safety of all pupils and address the  
          potential harm that may occur from returning a student to the  
          environment from which he or she was removed.  The language  
          recognizes the author's desire that a pupil be returned to his  
          or her prior school or another comprehensive school, but  
          balances this with the obligation of a school district to  
          protect the safety of all pupils.    
           
          In those circumstances where a pupil has been readmitted  
          pursuant to the procedures set forth in Education Code Section  
          48916, this bill makes clear that the readmitted pupil has the  
          right to return to his or her prior school or another  
          comprehensive school of the district.  The readmission process  
          outlined in existing law permits the school district to retain a  
          pupil in an alternative placement if the pupil continues to pose  
          a danger to campus safety or to the other pupils or employees of  
          the school district.  However, for those pupils who are  
          readmitted, the proposed language, similar to other provisions  
          of this bill, gives the school district the discretion to place  
          the pupil in the most appropriate setting, whether the pupil's  
          prior school or another comprehensive school of the district.   
          The school district may also recommend continued placement in a  
          community day school, but this recommendation may be rejected by  
          the parent and his/her pupil.  This language will allow the  
          school district to fulfill its obligation to ensure the safety  
          of all pupils and address the potential harm that may occur from  
          returning a student to the environment from which he or she was  









                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page H

          removed.  The language recognizes the author's desire that a  
          pupil be returned to his or her prior school or another  
          comprehensive school, but balances this with the obligation of a  
          school district to protect the safety of all pupils.   

           Instructional Programs with Alternative Educational Settings  :   
          This bill is intended to provide assistance to those pupils who  
          are enrolled in alternative educational programs by ensuring  
          that each pupil is provided with appropriate instruction and  
          services.  

          1)This bill specifies that independent study programs offered  
            through county community schools and community day schools  
            must comply with all other laws governing independent study  
            programs.  

          2)This bill encourages, but does not require, county community  
            schools and community day schools to include credit recovery  
            assistance and tutoring services within their programs.  For  
            example, a county community school or community day school  
            could assign a student who has failed courses or is at risk of  
            falling behind on graduation credits, credit recovery courses.  
            Additionally, any student who is identified as at-risk of  
            failing could be required to attend tutoring and/and or be  
            assigned an academic advisor during his or her enrollment in  
            the county community school or community day school.

          3)This bill emphasizes the need for county community schools and  
            community day schools to ensure that pupils enrolled it these  
            settings are provided the appropriate assessments in all areas  
            of suspected disability and appropriate services and programs  
            specified in a pupil's individualized education program are  
            provided in compliance with existing state and federal law.   
            While this is not a new requirement, this ensures that for  
            programs that rely on distinct portions of the Education Code  
            to govern their programs, these requirements are clearly and  
            easily identified.  Similarly, this bill requires school  
            districts and county boards of education operating community  
            and community day schools, as applicable, to ensure that  
            appropriate services and programs designed to address the  
            language needs of pupils identified as English learners are  
            provided in compliance with all applicable state and federal  
            laws.










                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page I


          Because the pupils enrolled in these alternative education  
          settings are often receiving a multitude of services through  
          multiple agencies, the coordinated efforts of these service  
          providers is critical to the success of the pupil.  Therefore,  
          this bill specifies the intent of the Legislature that if an  
          individualized assessment shows that the pupil requires  
          additional educational services and supports, such as mental  
          health counseling, or classes, that are not available at the  
          community day school, the parent, guardian, or responsible adult  
          of the pupil, or the probation officer as appropriate, should be  
          informed. 


           Homeless Children and Youth  :  This bill repeals language that  
          allows districts and county offices of education to enroll  
          pupils in county community schools or community day schools on  
          the basis of the pupil's status as homeless.  The federal  
          McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Act of 2002 requires homeless  
          children and youth to be educated as part of a school's regular  
          academic program.  The United States Department of Education has  
          published non-regulatory guidance that makes clear districts  
          must provide homeless children and youth with services through  
          "programs and mechanisms that integrate homeless children and  
          youth with their non-homeless counterparts ? [and] must expand  
          upon or improve services provided as part of the regular school  
          program."  Repealing this language brings California into  
          compliance with this federal requirement. 

           Minors Who Are Within the Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court  :   
          This bill provides detailed guidance for placements of those  
          pupils who are on probation or are under the supervision of a  
          probation officer.  This bill references existing requirements  
          under the Welfare and Institutions Code that requires the  
          educational rights holder, when placing these pupils, to place  
          the child in the least restrictive educational programs,  
          consider whether the child has access to the academic resources,  
          services, and extracurricular and enrichment activities that are  
          available to all pupils, and ensure that all "school placement  
          decisions ? [are] based on the best interests of the child."  
           
          This bill extend procedures established under the California  
          Rules of Court as they relate to the rights of children in a  
          judicial proceeding to the placement of a pupil even when  









                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page J

          outside of a court proceeding.  The procedure set forth in the  
          rules of court require the court to consider a number of  
          specified factors when placing the pupil and require the court  
          to identify a plan for meeting those needs, and provide a clear,  
          written statement to that end.  The Rules of Court also require  
          written reports with specified information from the pupil's  
          social worker and probation officer.  In this context, a  
          probation officer's decision to place a pupil in a county  
          community school would be affected even when made outside of a  
          court setting.  This bill would permit the educational rights  
          holder to require the school district and probation officer to  
          follow the processes set forth in the Rules of Court. 

           Arguments in Support  .  While county community and community day  
          schools were designed to help at-risk students get back on  
          educational track, recent studies have highlighted gaps in the  
          ability of these schools to effectively help students reach  
          their academic goals.  One such gap exists in the lack of  
          clarity and information given to students and parents during the  
          transfer process.  Unfortunately, too many students are being  
          involuntarily placed into county community and community day  
          schools without receiving information about their educational  
          rights and with no clear understanding of their ability to  
          return to a traditional school setting.  Additionally students  
          are being "pushed out" of their current school without a process  
          for ensuring that the new school placement fits his or her  
          educational needs.  This bill will establish a transfer process  
          with built in safeguards that help ensure due process for  
          students, re-establish the role of these schools as temporary  
          rehabilitative placements.
           
          Arguments in Opposition  .  While the opponents are respectful of  
          the author's desire to protect the due process and educational  
          rights of pupils, they are concerned that the language of this  
          bill is far too restrictive of the districts' authority to  
          appropriately place the pupils for whom they are responsible.   
          Additionally, opponents of this bill contend that the authority  
          of the school attendance review board (SARB) is unnecessarily  
          compromised and would, in effect, register that body powerless.   
          The absence or ineffectiveness of the SARB, would make  
          enforcement of California's compulsory attendance laws nearly  
          impossible.  







                                                       



                                                                  SB 744
                                                                  Page K

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jill Rice / ED. / (916) 319-2087 


                                                                FN: 0002215