BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 758| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 758 Author: Block (D) Amended: 5/7/13 Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE : 6-0, 5/1/13 AYES: Wolk, Beall, DeSaulnier, Emmerson, Hernandez, Liu NO VOTE RECORDED: Knight SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 SUBJECT : General plans: City of Coronado SOURCE : City of Coronado DIGEST : This bill extends, from 180 days to 540 days, the amount of time the City of Coronado can take to amend its general plan after an amendment to the airport land use compatibility plan. ANALYSIS : Every county and city must adopt a general plan for the physical development of its jurisdiction and related areas. Major land use decisions, like zoning, subdivisions, and public works, must be consistent with the local general plan. Each general plan must contain at least seven elements: land use, circulation, conservation, open-space, housing, noise, and safety. State law also requires general plans to address other topics based on the community's location, like coastal resources, seismic hazards, or floodplains. Except for the housing element, the Planning and Zoning Law does not require CONTINUED SB 758 Page 2 counties and cities to regularly revise their general plans. If a general plan covers a public airport, counties and cities must amend their plans to be consistent with an airport land use commission (ALUC)'s adopted airport land use compatibility plan (ALUCP), which guides appropriate land uses around airports. For a military air installation, military officials adopt an Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) for each airfield to define potential accident zones and noise contours. In 2002, to address urban encroachment impacts on military activities, the Legislature required county and city general plans to address military facilities, and required an ALUCP be consistent with safety and noise standards in the AICUZ SB 1468, (Knight, Chapter 971, Statutes of 2002). Once an AICUZ is released, the ALUC is responsible for amending the ALUCP. State law requires that within 180 days of the ALUCP's amendment, counties and cities must either amend their general plans, and other applicable plans, to be consistent with the ALUCP, or take steps necessary to overrule the ALUCP by adopting specified findings, as required in state law. This bill requires that the City of Coronado's general plan, and any applicable specific plan, be amended, as necessary, within 540 days of any amendment to the airport land use compatibility plan, if the amendment is made prior to January 1, 2015. This bill provides that this extension remains in effect only until January 1, 2017, or 540 days after an amendment to the ALUCP, whichever is earlier, and as of that date is repealed. This bill makes findings and declarations to support its purpose. Comments According to the Senate Governance and Finance Committee analysis, due to its unique characteristic as an island community and existence prior to Naval Base Coronado, the City of Coronado would like more time to incorporate the ALUCP into its general plan and associated documents, like its local coastal plan. Because the 2002 Knight legislation required an airport land use commission's ALUCP be consistent with Navy's AICUZ document, the City's existing zoning regulations and land CONTINUED SB 758 Page 3 uses may have significant residential and commercial development conflicts. Since the last AICUZ in 1984, approximately 374 single-family homes, 40 multi-family units, 4 commercial structures, and 14 hotel structures, including Hotel del Coronado, are located in Accident Potential Zone 1. Without a change in state law, proponents argue that the San Diego Airport Authority won't have the ability to develop an ALUCP that addresses the City's uniqueness. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 5/20/13) City of Coronado (source) City of Imperial Beach AB:ej 5/20/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED