SB 811, as amended, Lara. State Highway Route 710.
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law imposes various requirements for the development and implementation of transportation projects.
This bill would impose various additional requirements on the department, or on another agency, if that agency agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agency with respect to the I-710 expansion project in the County of Los Angeles from State Highway Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach. The bill would require the lead agency, in consultation with all interested community organizations, tobegin delete considerend deletebegin insert includeend insert,
within the environmental review process for the project, alternatives to address the air quality, public health, and mobility impacts the project will have on neighboring communitiesbegin insert, including, in its entirety, Community Alternative 7, as defined, as a complete project alternativeend insert. The bill would require the final environmental document approved by the lead agency to include an investment in identified mitigation measures begin insertand community benefits end insertfor the affected communities and the Los Angeles River. The bill would require the lead agency to submit a report in that regard to the Legislature at least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental document for the projectbegin insert, and would require the Senate Committee
on Transportation and Housing and the Assembly Committee on Transportation to hold a public joint hearing on the proposed end insertbegin insertfinal environmental document at least 60 days prior to approval of the final environmental documentend insert. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 103.1 is added to the Streets and
2Highways Code, to read:
(a) As used in this section, the following terms have
4the following meanings:
5(1) “I-710 expansion project” means the proposed program of
6improvements to the State Highway Route 710 Corridor in the
7County of Los Angeles within the State Highway Route 710
8Corridor project study area, which extends from State Highway
9Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach.
10The I-710 expansion project does not include any extension of
11State Highway Route 710 through South Pasadena from State
12Highway Route 10 to State Highway Route 210.
13(2) “Community Alternative 7” means an alternative
14infrastructure plan developed by a coalition of community partners,
15and submitted for consideration to the I-710 expansion project’s
16lead agency in response to the first draft environmental review
17document. Community Alternative 7 includes mitigation measures
18and community benefits to address existing and future public health
19concerns for the affected area.
20(2)
end delete
21begin insert(3)end insert “Lead agency” means the department, unless another agency
22agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agency for the I-710
23expansion project under the California Environmental Quality Act
24(Division
13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public
P3 1Resources Code), in which case “lead agency” means that other
2agency.
3(3)
end delete
4begin insert(4)end insert “Los Angeles River” or “river” means the Los Angeles River
5within the State Highway Route 710 Corridor project study area,
6
including the adjacent tributaries of Compton Creek and Rio
7Hondo.
8(5) “Project committee” means the committee facilitated by the
9project’s lead agency as a part of the I-710 expansion project
10community participation framework, and is comprised of elected
11officials from I-710 expansion project corridor communities and
12funding partner representatives who make recommendations to
13the funding partners and the department on key assumptions and
14decisions in the environmental review process. The funding
15partners include the department, the Los Angeles County
16Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the Gateway Cities Council
17of Governments, the Southern California Association of
18Governments, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and the
19Interstate 5 Joint Powers Authority.
20(b) The Legislature finds and declaresbegin delete that theend deletebegin insert all of the
21following:end insert
22begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertTheend insert proposed I-710
expansion project is a project of national
23significance that is intended to expand capacity on State Highway
24Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles to accommodate the
25movement of freight from and to the ports of Los Angeles and
26Long Beach, thereby providing economic benefits in the region
27and beyond. However, the I-710 expansion project, as proposed,
28will have adverse public health, air quality, and quality-of-life
29impacts on residents residing near the corridor from East Los
30Angeles to Long Beach.
31(2) The proposed I-710 expansion project is a “goods
32movement” project that should be aligned with the principles laid
33out in the 2007 Goods Movement Action Plan, prepared by the
34California Environmental Protection Agency and the Business,
35Transportation and Housing Agency. These principles
require that
36the project be developed in a way that provides improvements to
37the communities housing the project. For the I-710 expansion
38project, these improvements include all of the following:
39(A) River improvements including those that contribute to
40revitalization of the river and green, active space along the river.
P4 1(B) Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure; public transit
2infrastructure and operations.
3(C) Targeted hiring and job training related to the construction
4and operation of the
project.
5(D) Improvements to conditions at sensitive sites, such as
6schools, homes, and elderly care facilities.
7(3) The proposed I-710 expansion project is a transportation
8project that should be aligned with the goals of Assembly Bill 32
9(Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006) and Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728,
10Statutes of 2008) of reducing greenhouse gases by reducing vehicle
11miles traveled and increasing public transit use and active
12transportation.
13(4) Community Alternative 7 includes these principles,
goals,
14and improvements. On January 31, 2013, the project committee
15for the proposed I-710 expansion project voted to recommend that
16the lead agency consider Community Alternative 7 in its entirety
17in the draft environmental review document for the project.
18(c) The lead agency, in consultation with all interested
19community organizations, shallbegin delete considerend deletebegin insert
includeend insert, within the
20environmental review process, alternatives to address the air
21quality, public health, and mobility impacts the I-710 expansion
22project will have on neighboring communitiesbegin insert, and shall identify
23measures to improve conditions presently affecting the communities
24surrounding the existing Route 710 freeway. One of these
25alternatives shall be Community Alternative 7, considered in its
26entirety, as a complete project alternativeend insert.
27(d) The final environmental document approved by the lead
28agency for the I-710 expansion project shall include an investment
29in identified mitigation measures begin insertand community benefits end insertfor the
30affected communities
and the Los Angeles River.
31(e) At least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental
32document for the I-710 expansion project, the lead agency shall
33submit a report to the Legislature describing the identified
34mitigation measures begin insertand community benefits end insertthat will be included
35in the project and providing evidence of meeting the requirements
36of this section. The report shall be submitted pursuant to Section
379795 of the Government Code.
38(f) At least 60 days prior to approval by the lead agency of the
39final environmental document for the I-710 expansion project, the
40Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing
and the
P5 1Assembly Committee on Transportation shall hold a public joint
2hearing on the proposed final environmental document.
O
95