Amended in Assembly August 19, 2013

Amended in Assembly August 5, 2013

Amended in Assembly June 24, 2013

Amended in Senate May 28, 2013

Amended in Senate May 6, 2013

Amended in Senate April 3, 2013

Senate BillNo. 811


Introduced by Senator Lara

February 22, 2013


An act to add Section 103.1 to the Streets and Highways Code, relating to transportation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 811, as amended, Lara. State Highway Route 710.

Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law imposes various requirements for the development and implementation of transportation projects.

This bill would impose various additional requirements on the department, or on another agency, if that agency agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agencybegin insert,end insert with respect to the I-710 corridor project in the County of Los Angeles from State Highway Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach. The bill would require the lead agency, in consultation with all interested community organizations, to include, within the environmental review process for the project, alternatives to address the air quality, public health, and mobility impacts the project will have on neighboring communities, including, in its entirety, Community Alternative 7, as defined, as a complete project alternative. The bill would require the final environmental document approved by the lead agency to include an investment in identified mitigation measures and community benefits for the affected communities and the Los Angeles River. The bill would require the lead agency to submit a report in that regard to thebegin delete Legislatureend deletebegin insert project committeeend insert at least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental document for the project. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 103.1 is added to the Streets and
2Highways Code
, to read:

3

103.1.  

(a) As used in this section, the following terms have
4the following meanings:

5(1) “I-710 corridor project” means the proposed program of
6improvements to the State Highway Route 710 Corridor in the
7County of Los Angeles within the State Highway Route 710
8Corridor project study area, which extends from State Highway
9Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach.
10The I-710 corridor project does not include any extension of State
11Highway Route 710 through South Pasadena from State Highway
12Route 10 to State Highway Route 210.

13(2) “Community Alternative 7” means an alternative
14infrastructure plan developed by a coalition of community partners,
15and submitted for consideration to the I-710 corridor project’s lead
16agency in response to the first draft environmental review
17 document, and voted on by the I-710 EIR/EIS Project Committee
18to be included in the recirculated draft EIR/Supplemental EIS
19document.

20(3) “Lead agency” means the department, unless another agency
21agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agency for the I-710
22corridor project under the California Environmental Quality Act
23(Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public
24Resources Code), in which case “lead agency” means that other
25agency.

P3    1(4) “Los Angeles River” or “river” means the Los Angeles River
2within the State Highway Route 710 Corridor project study area,
3including the adjacent tributaries of Compton Creek and Rio
4Hondo.

5(5) “Project committee” means the committee facilitated by the
6project’s lead agency as a part of the I-710 corridor project
7community participation framework, and is comprised of elected
8officials from I-710 corridor project corridor communities and
9funding partner representatives who make recommendations to
10the funding partners and the department on key assumptions and
11decisions in the environmental review process. The funding
12partners include the department, the Los Angeles County
13Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the Gateway Cities Council
14of Governments, the Southern California Association of
15Governments, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and the
16Interstate 5 Joint Powers Authority.

17(b) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

18(1) The proposed I-710 corridor project is a project of national
19 significance that is intended to expand capacity on State Highway
20Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles to accommodate the
21movement of freight from and to the Ports of Los Angeles and
22Long Beach, thereby providing economic benefits in the region
23and beyond. However, the I-710 corridor project, as proposed,
24may have adverse public health, air quality, and quality-of-life
25impacts on residents residing near the corridor from East Los
26Angeles to Long Beach.

27(2) The proposed I-710 corridor project is a “goods movement”
28project that should be aligned with the principles laid out in the
292007 Goods Movement Action Plan, prepared by the California
30Environmental Protection Agency and the Business, Transportation
31and Housing Agency. These principles highlight the importance
32of goods movement projects that provide local communities with
33 benefits and improvements. This supports the goal that one of the
34I-710 alternatives should provide improvements to the communities
35housing the project. For the I-710 corridor project, these
36improvements may include, but are not limited to, the following:

37(A)  River improvements including those that contribute to
38revitalization of the river and green, active space along the river.

39(B) Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure; public transit
40infrastructure and operations.

P4    1(C) Targeted hiring and job training related to the construction
2and operation of the project.

3(D) Improvements to conditions at sensitive sites, such as
4schools, homes, elderly care facilities, and homeless care facilities.

5(3) The proposed I-710 corridor project is a transportation
6project that should be consistent with the goals of Assembly Bill
732 (Ch. 488, Stats. 2006) and Senate Bill 375 (Ch. 728, Stats.
82008) of reducing greenhouse gases by reducing vehicle miles
9 traveled and increasing public transit use and active transportation.

10(4) Community Alternative 7 includes these principles, goals,
11and improvements. On January 31, 2013, the project committee
12for the proposed I-710 corridor project voted to recommend that
13the lead agency consider Community Alternative 7 in its entirety
14in the draft environmental review document for the project.

15(c) The lead agency, in consultation with all interested
16community organizations, shall include, within the environmental
17review process, alternatives to address the air quality, public health,
18and mobility impacts that the I-710 corridor project could have on
19neighboring communities. One of these alternatives shall be
20Community Alternative 7, studied in its entirety, as a complete
21project alternative.

22(d) The final environmental document approved by the lead
23agency for the I-710 corridor project shall include an investment
24in identified mitigation measures where there are impacts to the
25affected communities and the Los Angeles River.

26(e) At least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental
27document for the I-710 corridor project, the lead agency shall
28submit a report to thebegin delete Legislatureend deletebegin insert project committeeend insert describing
29the identified mitigation measures and community benefits that
30will be included in the project and providing evidence of meeting
31the requirements of this section.begin delete The report shall be submitted
32pursuant to Section 9795 of the Government Code.end delete



O

    93