Amended in Assembly September 3, 2013

Amended in Assembly August 19, 2013

Amended in Assembly August 5, 2013

Amended in Assembly June 24, 2013

Amended in Senate May 28, 2013

Amended in Senate May 6, 2013

Amended in Senate April 3, 2013

Senate BillNo. 811


Introduced by Senator Lara

February 22, 2013


An act to add Section 103.1 to the Streets and Highways Code, relating to transportation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 811, as amended, Lara. State Highway Route 710.

Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law imposes various requirements for the development and implementation of transportation projects.

This bill would impose various additional requirements on the department, or on another agency, if that agency agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agency, with respect to the I-710 corridor project in the County of Los Angeles from State Highway Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach. The bill would require the lead agency, in consultation with all interested community organizations, to include, within the environmental review process for the project, alternatives to address the air quality, public health, and mobility impacts the project will have on neighboring communities, including, in its entirety, Community Alternative 7, as defined, as a complete project alternative. The bill would require the final environmental document approved by the lead agency to include an investment in identified mitigation measures and community benefits for the affected communities and the Los Angeles River. The bill would require the lead agency to submit a report in that regard to thebegin delete project committeeend deletebegin insert I-710 EIR/EIS Project Committeeend insert at least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental document for the project. The bill would make legislative findings and declarations.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 103.1 is added to the Streets and
2Highways Code
, to read:

3

103.1.  

(a) As used in this section, the following terms have
4the following meanings:

5(1) “I-710 corridor project” means the proposed program of
6improvements to the State Highway Route 710 Corridor in the
7County of Los Angeles within the State Highway Route 710
8Corridor project study area, which extends from State Highway
9Route 60 in East Los Angeles to Ocean Boulevard in Long Beach.
10The I-710 corridor project does not include any extension of State
11Highway Route 710 through South Pasadena from State Highway
12Route 10 to State Highway Route 210.

13(2) “Community Alternative 7” means an alternative
14infrastructure plan developed by a coalition of community partners,
15and submitted for consideration to the I-710 corridor project’s lead
16agency in response to the first draft environmental review
17 document, and voted on by the I-710 EIR/EIS Project Committee
18to be included in the recirculated draft EIR/Supplemental EIS
19document.

20(3) “Lead agency” means the department, unless another agency
21agrees to assume responsibility as the lead agency for the I-710
22corridor project under the California Environmental Quality Act
23(Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public
P3    1Resources Code), in which case “lead agency” means that other
2agency.

3(4) “Los Angeles River” or “river” means the Los Angeles River
4within the State Highway Route 710 Corridor project study area,
5including the adjacent tributaries of Compton Creek and Rio
6Hondo.

7(5) begin delete“Project committee” end deletebegin insert“I-710 EIR/EIS Project Committee” end insert
8means the committee facilitated by the project’s lead agency as a
9part of the I-710 corridor project community participation
10framework, and is comprised of elected officials from I-710
11corridor project corridor communities and funding partner
12representatives who make recommendations to the funding partners
13and the department on key assumptions and decisions in the
14environmental review process. The funding partners include the
15department, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
16Authority, the Gateway Cities Council of Governments, the
17Southern California Association of Governments, the Ports of Los
18Angeles and Long Beach, and the Interstate 5 Joint Powers
19Authority.

20(b) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

21(1) The proposed I-710 corridor project is a project of national
22 significance that is intended to expand capacity on State Highway
23Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles to accommodate the
24movement of freight from and to the Ports of Los Angeles and
25Long Beach, thereby providing economic benefits in the region
26and beyond. However, the I-710 corridor project, as proposed,
27may have adverse public health, air quality, and quality-of-life
28impacts on residents residing near the corridor from East Los
29Angeles to Long Beach.

30(2) The proposed I-710 corridor project is a “goods movement”
31project that should be aligned with the principles laid out in the
322007 Goods Movement Action Plan, prepared by the California
33Environmental Protection Agency and the Business, Transportation
34and Housing Agency. These principles highlight the importance
35of goods movement projects that provide local communities with
36 benefits and improvements.begin delete This supports the goal that one of the
37I-710 alternatives should provide improvements to the communities
38housing the project. For the I-710 corridor project, these
39improvements may include, but are not limited to, the following:end delete

begin delete

P4    1(A)  River improvements including those that contribute to
2revitalization of the river and green, active space along the river.

3(B) Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure; public transit
4infrastructure and operations.

5(C) Targeted hiring and job training related to the construction
6and operation of the project.

7(D) Improvements to conditions at sensitive sites, such as
8schools, homes, elderly care facilities, and homeless care facilities.

end delete

9(3) The proposed I-710 corridor project is a transportation
10project that should be consistent with the goals of Assembly Bill
1132 (Ch. 488, Stats. 2006) and Senate Bill 375 (Ch. 728, Stats.
122008) of reducing greenhouse gases by reducing vehicle miles
13 traveled and increasing public transit use and active transportation.

14(4) Community Alternative 7 includes these principles, goals,
15and improvements. On January 31, 2013, thebegin delete project committee
16for the proposed I-710 corridor projectend delete
begin insert I-710 EIR/EIS Project
17Committeeend insert
voted to recommend that the lead agency consider
18Community Alternative 7 in its entirety in the draft environmental
19review document for the project.

20(c) The lead agency, in consultation with all interested
21community organizations, shall include, within the environmental
22review process, alternatives to address the air quality, public health,
23and mobility impacts that the I-710 corridor project could have on
24neighboring communities. One of these alternatives shall be
25Community Alternative 7, studied in its entirety, as a complete
26project alternative.

27(d) The final environmental document approved by the lead
28agency for the I-710 corridor project shall include an investment
29in identified mitigation measures where there are impacts to the
30affected communities and the Los Angeles River.

31(e) At least 90 days prior to approving the final environmental
32document for the I-710 corridor project, the lead agency shall
33submit a report to thebegin delete project committeeend deletebegin insert I-710 EIR/EIS Project
34Committeeend insert
describing the identified mitigation measures and
35community benefits that will be included in the project and
36providing evidence of meeting the requirements of this section.



O

    92