BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 835| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: SB 835 Author: Hill (D) Amended: 3/26/14 Vote: 21 SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE : 5-0, 4/1/14 AYES: Galgiani, Cannella, Berryhill, Lieu, Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 SUBJECT : Food animals: medically important antimicrobial drugs SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill codifies the Food and Drug Administrations (FDA) Guidance for Industry #213 dated December 2013 by requiring the Secretary of the Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) to refuse to register a livestock drug administered in the feed or drinking water of food animals if such drug is a medically important antimicrobial drug. Requires a veterinarian-client-patient relationship, as described, to exist prior to the use of a medically important antimicrobial drug. ANALYSIS : Existing federal law: 1.States the FDA is responsible for protecting public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, quality, and security of human and veterinary drugs. CONTINUED SB 835 Page 2 2.Establishes, within FDA, the Center for Veterinary Medicine which regulates the manufacture and distribution of drugs that will be administered to animals. Existing state law: 1.Requires the Secretary of DFA to register over-the-counter livestock drugs and regulate their use for safety and efficacy. 2.Requires a license for retail sales of restricted livestock drugs. 3.Requires each licensee shall keep a record of each sale of a restricted drug, including the kind and quantity of the drug; sale date; purchaser's name, address and signature; and any other information deemed necessary by the Secretary. This bill: 1.Codifies the FDA Guidance for Industry #213 dated December 2013. 2.Defines "medically important antimicrobial drug" to mean a drug listed in the FDA Guidance for Industry #152 which categorizes these drugs as critically important, highly important, or important antimicrobial drugs. 3.Requires the Secretary of DFA to refuse to register a medically important antimicrobial drug administered to food animals through feed or drinking water unless the drug complies with the specified requirements below: A. Requires drug manufacturers to remove from the label of said drugs the approved use for growth promotion or feed efficiency. B. Requires drug manufacturers to change the over-the-counter availability of said drugs to 1) requiring a veterinary feed directive (VFD) if the drug is administered in animal feed or 2) requiring a veterinary prescription if the drug is administered in drinking water. CONTINUED SB 835 Page 3 C. Requires that medically important antimicrobial drugs administered through feed or water may only be used under the supervision of a veterinarian to treat, prevent, or control disease. 1.Requires a veterinarian-client-patient relationship to ensure that medically important antimicrobial drugs are used according to professionally accepted best practices. 2.Requires drug manufacturers to comply with these provisions by January 1, 2017, and reregister medically important antimicrobial drugs with the Secretary of DFA. 3.Authorizes the Secretary to continue registering a drug during FDA's GFI #213 review period should the review be delayed beyond January 1, 2017. 4.Authorizes the Secretary to extend the implementation date if revisions to the VFD cause FDA to delay implementation of GFI #213. 5.Authorizes the Secretary to promulgate regulations to ensure that California regulations are consistent with GFI #213 should revisions to the VFD cause the FDA to revise GFI #213. Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently issued a report titled Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. The CDC estimates that in the United States more than two million people are sickened every year with antibiotic-resistant infections with at least 23,000 infections resulting in death. In its report, the CDC lists four core actions that fight the spread of antibiotic resistance: 1) preventing infections from occurring and preventing resistant bacteria from spreading, 2) tracking resistant bacteria, 3) improving the use of antibiotics, and 4) promoting the development of new antibiotics and new diagnostic tests for resistant bacteria. The CDC notes that the use of antibiotics is the single most important factor leading to antibiotic resistance around the world. Up to 50% of all antibiotics prescribed for people are either not needed or not optimally effective as prescribed. CONTINUED SB 835 Page 4 Antibiotics are also used in food-producing animals for the purpose of promoting growth, which the CDC recommends phasing out. The FDA is currently developing guidance to promote judicious use of antimicrobials, as described below. Over the last few years, the FDA has worked on creating Guidelines for Industry (GFI) regarding the judicious use of medically important antimicrobial drugs. In a series of three guidances, the FDA has compiled a list of medically important antimicrobial drugs categorized by their importance to human health (GFI #152), developed principals that determine the appropriate or judicious use of such drugs by limiting use to only when necessary to maintain animal health and with veterinary oversight or consultation (GFI #219), and provided recommendations as to the implementation of these guidelines (GFI #213). The FDA concludes that using medically important antimicrobial drugs for animal growth promotion or feed efficiency is not a judicious use and that veterinary oversight or consultation is necessary when using these drugs. In December 2013, the FDA released the final draft of GFI #213. This document contains nonbinding recommendations to industry regarding the use of medically important antimicrobial drugs in the feed and drinking water of food-producing animals. The FDA intends to work with drug companies to help them voluntarily implement the recommendations, which include: 1) phasing out the use of medically important antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals for production purposes (growth promotion and feed efficiency), and 2) include veterinary oversight of these drugs when used in the feed or water of food-producing animals. Prior Legislation SB 416 (Florez, 2009) would have authorized a school district to make every effort to purchase poultry and meat products that have not been treated with nontherapeutic antibiotics. SB 416 failed passage in the Senate. SB 1058 (Alquist, Chapter 296, Statutes of 2008) establishes the Medical Facility Infection Control and Prevention Act, which requires specified hospitals to implement procedures for screening, prevention, and reporting of hospital-related infections, including MRSA, an antimicrobial-resistant CONTINUED SB 835 Page 5 bacterium. SB 739 (Speier, Chapter 526, Statutes of 2006) establishes the Hospital Infectious Disease Control Program, which requires the Department of Public Health and specified hospitals to implement a disease surveillance and hospital associated infection prevention program. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes SUPPORT : (Verified 4/28/14) California Cattlemen's Association California State Grange California Veterinary Medical Association The Pew Charitable Trusts Infectious Disease Association of California Health Officers Association of California Health Care Without Harm OPPOSITION : (Verified 4/28/14) Consumers Union ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The California Veterinary Medical Association writes in support of this bill stating that it "?ensures that this important relationship between veterinarians and food producers will continue to remain strong, in accordance with the law." Health Care Without Harm states, "This bill helps protect public health by ending the misuse of antibiotics for the purposes of growth promotion in animal agriculture. Moreover, it increases medical oversight over our valuable drugs by requiring prescriptions by veterinarians when antibiotics are administered to animals through food and water." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Consumers Union states in opposition that under this bill, agribusiness would be able to continue the regular feeding of antibiotics to animals, potentially every day of their lives, for disease prevention. To combat antibiotic resistance, the daily feeding of antibiotics to animals must be ended and that antibiotics should be used in animals in the way CONTINUED SB 835 Page 6 they are used in humans - only for treatment of a specific illness, for a limited period of time. JL:nl 4/29/14 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED