BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        SB 900|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                 UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 900
          Author:   Hill (D)
          Amended:  7/1/14
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, UTIL. & COMMUNIC. COMM.  :  9-0, 4/1/14
          AYES:  Padilla, Fuller, Cannella, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Hill,  
            Knight, Pavley, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Block, De León

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/23/14
          AYES:  De León, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg

           SENATE FLOOR  :  35-0, 5/28/14
          AYES:  Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, Corbett,  
            Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Knight, Lara, Leno,  
            Lieu, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nielsen, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Roth, Steinberg, Torres, Vidak, Walters, Wolk, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Hancock, Liu, Wright, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/14/14 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    Public utilities

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the Public Utilities Commission  
          (PUC) to consider safety in electrical and gas rate cases.
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 900
                                                                     Page  
          2


           Assembly Amendments  add economic effects as part of the PUC  
          assessment. 

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Requires that the PUC and each gas corporation place safety  
             of the public and gas corporation employees as the top  
             priority and further requires that PUC take all reasonable  
             and appropriate actions necessary to carry out safety as a  
             priority consistent with the principle of just and reasonable  
             cost-based rates. 

          2. Requires, in any ratemaking proceeding in which the PUC  
             authorizes a gas corporation to recover expenses for the  
             maintenance and repair of transmission pipelines, that the  
             PUC require the gas corporation to establish and maintain a  
             balancing account for the recovery of those expenses. 

          3. Defines quasi-legislative proceedings as those that establish  
             policy including rulemakings and investigations which may  
             establish rules affecting an entire industry. 

          This bill:

          1.Requires the PUC to develop formal procedures to consider  
            safety in electrical and gas rate cases.  Requires the  
            procedures include a means by which safety information  
            acquired by the PUC through monitoring, data tracking and  
            analysis, accident investigations, and audits of an  
            applicant's safety programs may inform the PUC's consideration  
            of the application.

          2.Requires the PUC to take all necessary and appropriate actions  
            to assess the economic effects of its decisions and mitigate  
            the impacts of its decisions on customer, public, and employee  
            safety.

           Background
           
          The Independent Review Panel that studied the San Bruno  
          explosion found in June of 2011 that safety had not been  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 900
                                                                     Page  
          3

          effectively included in the PUC decision-making. 

          An October 2013 report by the Senate Subcommittee on Gas and  
          Electric Infrastructure Safety, Slow Progress Toward Safety:   
          Improving Performance and Priorities in the Safety Plans of the  
          PUC, found that the PUC had yet to incorporate procedures to  
          include safety considerations into utility rate cases and its  
          proceedings generally.

          To include safety into utility rate cases, the PUC opened a  
          rulemaking in November 2013 to change its rate case plan. 

          In order to ensure that a utility is accountable for its  
          proposed expenditures for risk mitigation, this bill requires  
          the PUC to incorporate safety information gleaned from the PUC's  
          audits, accident investigations, and other compliance work into  
          its consideration of rate cases.

          The PUC has not been able to include safety considerations into  
          its proceedings generally.  A February 2013 survey report had  
          found that PUC employees had not been convinced of the agency's  
          commitment to safety.  One employee noted, "There are no  
          existing mechanisms for inserting safety concerns into the  
          record.  Often, when safety is considered in a case proceeding  
          it is at the end of the process, when it is too late to make  
          necessary changes."

           Comment
           
          According to the author's office, over the last two years, the  
          PUC has recognized the need to include safety in its  
          proceedings.  However, the development of effectiveness  
          procedures for addressing safety so far has been slow.  This  
          bill ensures the PUC will integrate safety information in its  
          rate cases and general decision making proceedings.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, annual costs  
          up to $1 million from the PUC Utilities Reimbursement Account  
          (special) for increased safety analysis in ratesetting cases.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/14/14)

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                     SB 900
                                                                     Page  
          4


          Office of Ratepayer Advocates


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/14/14
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox,  
            Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon,  
            Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Holden, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein,  
            Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian,  
            Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. Pérez, V.  
            Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron,  
            Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Roger Hernández, Vacancy


          JG:d  8/14/14   Senate Floor Analyses 

                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                   ****  END  ****
          



















                                                                CONTINUED