Amended in Assembly June 18, 2014

Amended in Senate May 27, 2014

Amended in Senate March 27, 2014

Senate BillNo. 967


Introduced by Senators De León and Jackson

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Lowenthal)

(Coauthors: Senators Beall, Cannella, Evans, Galgiani, Monning, Pavley, Torres,begin insert andend insert Wolkbegin delete, and Yeeend delete)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Ammiano, Fong, Gonzalez, Quirk-Silva, Skinner, Ting, and Williams)

February 10, 2014


An act to add Section 67386 to the Education Code, relating to student safety.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 967, as amended, De León. Student safety: sexual assault.

Existing law requires the governing boards of each community college district, the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, and the governing boards of independent postsecondary institutions to adopt and implement written procedures or protocols to ensure that students, faculty, and staff who are victims of sexual assault on the grounds or facilities of their institutions receive treatment and information, including a description of on-campus and off-campus resources.

This bill would require the governing boards of each community college district, the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, and the governing boards of independent postsecondary institutions, in order to receive state funds for student financial assistance, to adopt policies concerningbegin delete campus sexual violence,end deletebegin insert sexual assault,end insert domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking that include certain elements, including an affirmative consent standard in the determination of whether consent was given by a complainant. The bill would require these governing boards to adopt certain sexual assault policies and protocols, as specified, and would require the governing boards, to the extent feasible, to enter into memoranda of understanding or other agreements or collaborative partnerships with on-campus and community-based organizations to refer students for assistance or make services available to students. The bill would also require the governing boards to implement comprehensive prevention and outreach programs addressing sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking. By requiring community college districts to adopt or modify certain policies and protocols, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 67386 is added to the Education Code,
2to read:

3

67386.  

(a) In order to receive state funds for student financial
4assistance, the governing board of each community college district,
5the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
6University of California, and the governing boards of independent
7postsecondary institutions shall adopt a policy concerningbegin delete campusend delete
8 sexualbegin delete violence,end deletebegin insert assault,end insert domestic violence, dating violence, and
9begin delete stalkingend deletebegin delete that includesend deletebegin insert stalking, as defined inend insertbegin insert the federal Higher
10Education Act of 1965end insert
begin insert (20 U.S.C. Sec. 1092(f)end insertbegin insert) involving a student,
11both on and off campus. The policy shall includeend insert
all of the
12following:

P3    1(1) An affirmative consent standard in the determination of
2whether consent was given bybegin delete a complainant.end deletebegin insert both parties to sexual
3activity.end insert
“Affirmative consent” begin delete is an affirmative, unambiguous,
4and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually
5agreed-upon sexual activity. Consent is informed, freely given,
6and voluntary. It is the responsibility of the person initiating the
7sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the consent of the other
8person to engage in the sexual activity.end delete
begin insert means affirmative,
9conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.
10It is the responsibility of each person involved in the sexual activity
11to ensure that he or she has the affirmative consent of the other
12or others to engage in the sexual activity.end insert
Lack of protest or
13resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent.
14begin delete Consentend deletebegin insert Affirmative consentend insert must be ongoing throughout a sexual begin delete15 encounterend delete begin insert activityend insert and can be revoked at any time. The existence
16of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact
17of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be
18assumed to be an indicator of consent.

19(2) A policy that, in the evaluation of complaints inbegin delete theend deletebegin insert anyend insert
20 disciplinary process, it shall not be a valid excusebegin insert to alleged lack
21of affirmative consentend insert
that the accused believed that the
22complainant consented to the sexual activity under either of the
23following circumstances:

24(A) The accused’s belief inbegin insert affirmativeend insert consent arose from the
25begin delete self-inducedend delete intoxication or recklessness of the accused.

26(B) The accused did not take reasonable steps, in the
27circumstances known to the accused at the time, to ascertainbegin delete thatend delete
28begin insert whetherend insert the complainantbegin delete was consenting.end deletebegin insert affirmatively consented.end insert

begin delete

29(3) A preponderance of the evidence standard in the
30determination of disciplinary action.

end delete
begin insert

31(3) A policy that the standard used in determining whether the
32elements of the complaint against the accused have been
33demonstrated is the preponderance of the evidence.

end insert

34(4) A policy that, in the evaluation of complaints in the
35disciplinary process, it shall not be a valid excuse that the accused
36believed that the complainantbegin insert affirmativelyend insert consented to the sexual
37activity if the accused knew or reasonably should have known that
38the complainant was unable to consent to the sexual activity under
39any of the following circumstances:

40(A) The complainant was asleep or unconscious.

P4    1(B) The complainant was incapacitated due to the influence of
2drugs, alcohol, or medication, so that the complainant could not
3understand the fact, nature, or extent of the sexualbegin delete situation.end delete
4begin insert activity.end insert

5(C) The complainant was unable to communicate due to a mental
6or physical condition.

7(b) In order to receive state funds for student financial assistance,
8the governing board of each community college district, the
9Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
10University of California, and the governing boards of independent
11postsecondary institutions shall adopt detailed and victim-centered
12begin delete sexual assaultend delete policies and protocolsbegin insert regarding sexual assault,
13domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking involving a studentend insert

14 that comport with best practices and current professional standards.
15At a minimum, the policies and protocols shall cover all of the
16following:

17(1) A policy statement on how the institution willbegin delete protect the end delete
18begin insert provide appropriateend insert confidentialitybegin delete ofend deletebegin insert forend insert individuals involved in
19begin delete theend deletebegin insert anend insert incident.

20(2) Initial response by the institution’s personnel to a report of
21begin deletesexual assault,end deletebegin insert an incident,end insert including requirements specific to
22assisting the victim, providing information in writing about the
23importance of preserving evidence, and the identification and
24location of witnesses.

25(3) Response to stranger and nonstranger sexual assault.

26(4) The preliminary victim interview, including the development
27of a victim interview protocol, and a comprehensive followup
28victimbegin delete interview.end deletebegin insert interview, as appropriate.end insert

29(5) Contacting and interviewing the accused.

begin insert

30(6) Seeking the identification and location of witnesses.

end insert
begin delete

31 31(6)

end delete

32begin insert(7)end insert Providing written notification to the victim about the
33availability of, and contact information for, on- and off-campus
34resources and services, and coordination with law enforcement,
35as appropriate.

begin delete

35 36(7)

end delete

37begin insert(8)end insert Participation of victimbegin delete advocates.end deletebegin insert advocates and other
38supporting people.end insert

begin delete

36 39(8)

end delete

P5    1begin insert(9)end insert Investigating allegations that alcohol or drugs were involved
2in thebegin delete incident, and providing amnesty from disciplinary action if
3the victim violated the school’s policy when the sexual assault
4occurred.end delete
begin insert incident.end insert

begin insert

5(10) Providing that those who participate in the investigation
6of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking,
7either as a complainant or a third-party witness, will not be subject
8to disciplinary sanctions for violations of the institution’s student
9conduct policy at or near the time of the incident if the violations
10did not place the health or safety of any other person at risk.

end insert
begin delete

40 11(9)

end delete

12begin insert(11)end insert The role of the institutional staff supervision.

begin delete

P5   1 13(10)

end delete

14begin insert(12)end insert A comprehensive, trauma-informed training program for
15campus officials involved in investigating and adjudicatingbegin delete campus
16sexual violence,end delete
begin insert sexual assault,end insert domestic violence, dating violence,
17and stalking cases.

begin delete

6 18(11)

end delete

19begin insert(13)end insert Procedures forbegin delete anonymousend deletebegin insert confidentialend insert reportingbegin delete of sexual
20assault.end delete
begin insert by victims and third parties.end insert

21(c) In order to receive state funds for student financial assistance,
22the governing board of each community college district, the
23Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
24University of California, and the governing boards of independent
25postsecondary institutions shall, to the extent feasible, enter into
26memoranda of understanding, agreements, or collaborative
27partnerships with existing on-campus and community-based
28organizations, including rape crisis centers, to refer students for
29assistance or make services available to students, including
30counseling, health, mental health, victim advocacy, student
31advocacy, and legal assistance.

32(d) In order to receive state funds for student financial assistance,
33the governing board of each community college district, the
34Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
35University of California, and the governing boards of independent
36postsecondary institutions shall implement comprehensive
37prevention and outreach programs addressing sexual violence,
38domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking. A comprehensive
39prevention program shall include a range of prevention strategies,
40including, but not limited to,begin delete women’send delete empowerment programming,
P6    1awareness raising campaigns, primary prevention, bystander
2intervention, and risk reduction. Outreach programs shall be
3provided to make students aware of the institution’s policy on
4begin deletecampus sexual violence,end deletebegin insert sexual assault,end insert domestic violence, dating
5violence, and stalking. At a minimum, an outreach program shall
6include a process for contacting and informing the student body,
7campus organizations, athletic programs, and student groups about
8the institution’s overall sexual assault policy, the practical
9implications of an affirmative consent standard, and the rights and
10responsibilities of students under the policy. Outreach programming
11shall be included as part of new student orientation.

12

SEC. 2.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
13this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
14local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
15pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
164 of Title 2 of the Government Code.



O

    96