Amended in Assembly August 4, 2014

Amended in Assembly June 18, 2014

Amended in Senate May 27, 2014

Amended in Senate March 27, 2014

Senate BillNo. 967


Introduced by Senators De León and Jackson

(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Lowenthal)

(Coauthors: Senators Beall, Cannella, Evans, Galgiani, Monning, Pavley, Torres, and Wolk)

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Ammiano, Fong, Gonzalez, Quirk-Silva, Skinner, Ting, and Williams)

February 10, 2014


An act to add Section 67386 to the Education Code, relating to student safety.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 967, as amended, De León. Student safety: sexual assault.

Existing law requires the governing boards of each community college district, the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, and the governing boards of independent postsecondary institutions to adopt and implement written procedures or protocols to ensure that students, faculty, and staff who are victims of sexual assault on the grounds or facilities of their institutions receive treatment and information, including a description of on-campus and off-campus resources.

This bill would require the governing boards of each community college district, the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, and the governing boards of independent postsecondary institutions, in order to receive state funds for student financial assistance, to adopt policies concerning sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking that include certain elements, including an affirmative consent standard in the determination of whether consent was given by a complainant. The bill would require these governing boards to adopt certain sexual assault policies and protocols, as specified, and would require the governing boards, to the extent feasible, to enter into memoranda of understanding or other agreements or collaborative partnerships with on-campus and community-based organizations to refer students for assistance or make services available to students. The bill would also require the governing boards to implement comprehensive prevention and outreach programs addressing sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking. By requiring community college districts to adopt or modify certain policies and protocols, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 67386 is added to the Education Code,
2to read:

3

67386.  

(a) In order to receive state funds for student financial
4assistance, the governing board of each community college district,
5the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
6University of California, and the governing boards of independent
7postsecondary institutions shall adopt a policy concerning sexual
8assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking, as defined
9in the federal Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. Sec.
101092(f)) involving a student, both on and off campus. The policy
11shall include all of the following:

P3    1(1) An affirmative consent standard in the determination of
2whether consent was given by both parties to sexual activity.
3“Affirmative consent” means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary
4agreement to engage in sexual activity. It is the responsibility of
5each person involved in the sexual activity to ensure that he or she
6has the affirmative consent of the other or others to engage in the
7sexual activity. Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent,
8nor does silence mean consent. Affirmative consent must be
9ongoing throughout a sexual activity and can be revoked at any
10time. The existence of a dating relationship between the persons
11involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should
12never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent.

13(2) A policy that, in the evaluation of complaints in any
14 disciplinary process, it shall not be a valid excuse to alleged lack
15of affirmative consent that the accused believed that the
16complainant consented to the sexual activity under either of the
17following circumstances:

18(A) The accused’s belief in affirmative consent arose from the
19intoxication or recklessness of the accused.

20(B) The accused did not take reasonable steps, in the
21circumstances known to the accused at the time, to ascertain
22 whether the complainant affirmatively consented.

23(3) A policy that the standard used in determining whether the
24elements of the complaint against the accused have been
25demonstrated is the preponderance of the evidence.

26(4) A policy that, in the evaluation of complaints in the
27disciplinary process, it shall not be a valid excuse that the accused
28believed that the complainant affirmatively consented to the sexual
29activity if the accused knew or reasonably should have known that
30the complainant was unable to consent to the sexual activity under
31any of the following circumstances:

32(A) The complainant was asleep or unconscious.

33(B) The complainant was incapacitated due to the influence of
34drugs, alcohol, or medication, so that the complainant could not
35understand the fact, nature, or extent of the sexual activity.

36(C) The complainant was unable to communicate due to a mental
37or physical condition.

38(b) In order to receive state funds for student financial assistance,
39the governing board of each community college district, the
40Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
P4    1University of California, and the governing boards of independent
2postsecondary institutions shall adopt detailed and victim-centered
3policies and protocols regarding sexual assault, domestic violence,
4dating violence, and stalking involving a student that comport with
5best practices and current professional standards. At a minimum,
6the policies and protocols shall cover all of the following:

7(1) A policy statement on how the institution will provide
8appropriatebegin delete confidentiality for individuals involved in an incident.end delete
9begin insert protections for the privacy of individuals involved, including
10confidentiality.end insert

11(2) Initial response by the institution’s personnel to a report of
12 an incident, including requirements specific to assisting the victim,
13providing information in writing about the importance of preserving
14evidence, and the identification and location of witnesses.

15(3) Response to stranger and nonstranger sexual assault.

16(4) The preliminary victim interview, including the development
17of a victim interview protocol, and a comprehensive followup
18victim interview, as appropriate.

19(5) Contacting and interviewing the accused.

20(6) Seeking the identification and location of witnesses.

21(7) Providing written notification to the victim about the
22availability of, and contact information for, on- and off-campus
23resources and services, and coordination with law enforcement,
24as appropriate.

25(8) Participation of victim advocates and other supporting
26people.

27(9) Investigating allegations that alcohol or drugs were involved
28in the incident.

29(10) Providing thatbegin delete thoseend deletebegin insert an individualend insert whobegin delete participateend delete
30begin insert participates as a complainant or witnessend insert inbegin delete theend deletebegin insert anend insert investigation
31of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence,begin delete and stalking,
32either as a complainant or a third-party witness,end delete
begin insert or stalkingend insert will
33not be subject to disciplinary sanctions forbegin delete violationsend deletebegin insert a violationend insert
34 of the institution’s student conduct policy at or near the time of
35thebegin delete incident if the violations did not placeend deletebegin insert incident, unless the
36institution determines that the violation was egregious, including,
37but not limited to, an action that placesend insert
the health or safety of any
38other person atbegin delete risk.end deletebegin insert risk or involves plagiarism, cheating, or
39academic dishonesty.end insert

40(11) The role of the institutional staff supervision.

P5    1(12) A comprehensive, trauma-informed training program for
2campus officials involved in investigating and adjudicating sexual
3assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking cases.

4(13) Procedures for confidential reporting by victims and third
5parties.

6(c) In order to receive state funds for student financial assistance,
7the governing board of each community college district, the
8Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
9University of California, and the governing boards of independent
10postsecondary institutions shall, to the extent feasible, enter into
11memoranda of understanding, agreements, or collaborative
12partnerships with existing on-campus and community-based
13organizations, including rape crisis centers, to refer students for
14assistance or make services available to students, including
15counseling, health, mental health, victim advocacy,begin delete student
16advocacy,end delete
and legal assistancebegin insert, and including resources for the
17accusedend insert
.

18(d) In order to receive state funds for student financial assistance,
19the governing board of each community college district, the
20Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the
21University of California, and the governing boards of independent
22postsecondary institutions shall implement comprehensive
23prevention and outreach programs addressing sexual violence,
24domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking. A comprehensive
25prevention program shall include a range of prevention strategies,
26including, but not limited to, empowermentbegin delete programming,end delete
27begin insert programming for victim prevention,end insert awareness raising campaigns,
28primary prevention, bystander intervention, and risk reduction.
29Outreach programs shall be provided to make students aware of
30the institution’s policy on sexual assault, domestic violence, dating
31violence, and stalking. At a minimum, an outreach program shall
32include a process for contacting and informing the student body,
33campus organizations, athletic programs, and student groups about
34the institution’s overall sexual assault policy, the practical
35implications of an affirmative consent standard, and the rights and
36responsibilities of students under the policy.begin delete Outreachend delete

37begin insert(e)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertOutreachend insert programming shall be included as part ofbegin delete new
38student orientation.end delete
begin insert every incoming student’s orientation.end insert

39

SEC. 2.  

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
40this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
P6    1local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
2pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
34 of Title 2 of the Government Code.



O

    95