BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1089
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 10, 2014

                            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
                                 Richard Pan, Chair
                SB 1089 (Mitchell) - As Introduced:  February 19, 2014

           SENATE VOTE  :  34-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Medi-Cal: juvenile inmates.

           SUMMARY  :  Makes clarifying changes to existing law requiring the  
          Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to allow counties to  
          receive federal Medicaid funds (Medi-Cal in California) for  
          inpatient services provided in a medical institution off the  
          grounds of a correctional facility to juvenile inmates who would  
          be eligible for Medi-Cal if not in a correctional facility.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

       1)Clarifies that counties drawing down federal Medicaid funds for  
            specified juveniles are only required to provide their  
            proportional share of the non-federal share of the state's  
            administrative costs.

       2)States legislative intent that this program will result in no  
            increased cost to the state General Fund (GF).

       3)Makes other clarifying and correcting amendments.

           EXISTING LAW  :  

       1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by DHCS, under  
            which qualified low-income individuals, including children up  
            to 19 years of age, receive health care services.

       2)Requires DHCS to allow counties to receive any available federal  
            financial participation (FFP) for acute inpatient hospital  
            services and inpatient psychiatric services provided to  
            juvenile inmates who are admitted as inpatients in a medical  
            institution off the grounds of the correctional facility, and  
            who would be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits if they were not  
            in a correctional facility.

       3)Provides that if a county has elected to pursue obtaining FFP for  
            juvenile inmates, it does not alter or abrogate any obligation  
            of the state pursuant to an administrative action or a court  








                                                                  SB 1089
                                                                  Page  2

            order that is final and no longer subject to appeal to fund  
            and reimburse counties for any medical services provided to a  
            juvenile inmate.

       4)Provides that a county can elect to pursue obtaining FFP only if  
            it provides the non-federal share of the state's  
            administrative costs associated with implementation of this  
            requirement, and the non-federal share of expenditures for  
            acute inpatient hospital services and inpatient psychiatric  
            services provided to eligible juvenile inmates.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations Committee  
          pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

           COMMENTS  :

           1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL  .  According to the author, AB 396  
            (Mitchell), Chapter 394, Statutes of 2011 establishes a  
            voluntary program to allow the state, on behalf of counties  
            and the California Department of Corrections and  
            Rehabilitation, to draw down FFP under Medi-Cal for hospital  
            inpatient services and inpatient psychiatric services for  
            Medi-Cal-eligible detained juveniles at no cost to the state.   
            Counties electing to voluntarily participate would provide the  
            non-federal share of expenditures, and be paid the resulting  
            federal funds.  In the case of a federal audit disallowance,  
            the state will recoup from the participating county the amount  
            of the disallowance plus any applicable interest.  The author  
            states this bill will address the concern of DHCS that AB 396  
            may subject the State's General Fund to cost pressures, which  
            was never the intent of the author or the sponsors of AB 396.   


           2)BACKGROUND  .  Under federal Medicaid law, payments for care and  
            services provided to inmates of a public institution are not  
            eligible for FFP through Medicaid unless the inmate is a  
            patient in a medical institution.  Existing state law provides  
            an opportunity to draw down federal funds by establishing  
            juvenile and adult inmate eligibility for Medi-Cal when an  
            individual is receiving services at a medical facility off the  
            grounds of the correctional facility.  This approach enables  
            state and county savings to be achieved by funding health care  
            services with federal Medicaid matching funds, rather than  
            state and county funds.  In January 2014, DHCS issued a letter  
            to counties informing them of the new Medicaid claiming  








                                                                  SB 1089
                                                                  Page  3

            options.  Claims under AB 396 are eligible for reimbursement  
            retroactive to January 1, 2012.

           3)SUPPORT  .  This bill is sponsored by the Los Angeles County  
            (L.A. County) Board of Supervisors, which writes this bill is  
            a technical clean-up measure to AB 396 that contains  
            clarifying language required by DHCS to reaffirm that if  
            counties choose to participate in the program established by  
            AB 396, they will pay their pro rate share of the state's  
            administrative costs.  L.A. County indicates DHCS requested  
            the additional intent language to further protect the state's  
            GF.
          
          DHCS writes that this bill provides clean-up language to make  
            technical and clarifying changes that the scope of services  
            under the AB 396 process is limited to acute inpatient  
            hospital and inpatient psychiatric services, emphasizing the  
            Legislature's intent that the implementation of the AB 396  
            process will result in no increased cost to the state GF and  
            that DHCS agrees with the sponsor's intent that each county  
            will only pay its pro-rate share of the state's administrative  
            expenses.

           4)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION  . 
           
             a)   SB 695 (Hancock), Chapter 647, Statutes of 2011,  
               authorizes, until January 1, 2014, Medi-Cal benefits to be  
               provided to a Medi-Cal-eligible individual awaiting  
               adjudication in a county juvenile detention facility if the  
               county agrees to pay the state's share of Medi-Cal  
               expenditures and administrative costs.

             b)   AB 1628 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 729, Statutes of  
               2010, requires counties participating in the Medi-Cal  
               Coordinated Care Initiative to enroll Medi-Cal eligible  
               state inmates and parolees.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
          California Department of Health Care Services
          California State Association of Counties
          Urban Counties Caucus








                                                                  SB 1089
                                                                  Page  4

           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097