BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1117
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 17, 2014

           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS
                                  Luis Alejo, Chair
                    SB 1117 (Monning) - As Amended:  June 4, 2014

           SENATE VOTE  :   33-0
           
          SUBJECT  :   Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act.

           SUMMARY  :   Requires the Department of Pesticide Regulation  
          (DPR), in consultation with a specified subcommittee, to develop  
          peer-reviewed methods for determining how pesticides are  
          included on the Groundwater Protection List (List), among other  
          reforms. Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Requires DPR to determine, to the extent possible, the  
            toxicological significance of the pesticides listed on the  
            List.

          2)Requires the director of DPR (director) to regulate each  
            active ingredient, other specific ingredient, or degradation  
            product of a pesticide on the List that has the potential to  
            pollute groundwater.

          3)Requires the director, in consultation with a specified  
            subcommittee, to create a peer reviewed method to determine  
            the potential of a pesticide to pollute groundwater using  
            specific numerical values.

          4)States that the director may revise the peer review method,  
            subject to peer review.

          5)States that the peer review shall be conducted using an  
            existing peer review process.

          6)Deletes the duplicative requirement that dealers of pesticides  
            shall make quarterly reports to the director of all sales of  
            pesticides on the List.
           
          7)Requires DPR to monitor for each active ingredient, other  
            specified ingredient, or degradation product of a pesticide on  
            the List.

          8)Requires DPR to continuously review new science and data that  








                                                                  SB 1117
                                                                  Page  2

            could impact the validity of a finding that a pesticide has  
            not polluted and does not threaten to pollute the state's  
            groundwater.

          9)Requires the director to either mitigate the threat presented  
            by pollution or subject the pesticide to further review if the  
            department determines that there is no new science or data  
            that could impact the validity of a finding.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Establishes the Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act (Act)  
            to prevent pesticide pollution of the groundwater aquifers of  
            this state that may be used for drinking water supplies (Food  
            and Agricultural Code § 13141 et seq.).  

          2)Requires a person who has registered a pesticide in California  
            for agricultural uses to submit information for each active  
            ingredient in each pesticide registered to the director (Food  
            and Agricultural Code § 13143).

          3)Defines "degradation product" as a substance resulting from  
            the transformation of a pesticide by physiological or  
            biochemical means.

          4)Defines "pollution" as the introduction into the groundwaters  
            of the state of an active ingredient, other specified product,  
            or degradation product of an active ingredient of a pesticide  
            above a level, with an adequate margin of safety, that does  
            not cause adverse health effects. 

          5)Requires DPR to establish specific numerical values for water  
            solubility, soil adsorbtion, soil metabolism, and field  
            dissipation, and requires the department to revise those  
            values as needed to protect groundwater (Food and Agricultural  
            Code § 13144).

          6)Requires the director to post information on DPR's website for  
            each pesticide registered for agricultural use (Food and  
            Agricultural Code § 13144).

          7)Establishes a subcommittee of the director's pesticide  
            registration and evaluation committee, consisting of one  
            member each representing the director, the State Department of  
            Health Services, and the State Water Resources Control Board,  








                                                                  SB 1117
                                                                  Page  3

            to hold hearings to review information submitted by pesticide  
            registrants to make findings (Food and Agricultural Code §  
            13150).

          8)Describes the process for which the California Environmental  
            Protection Agency shall conduct an external scientific peer  
            review for any rule proposed for adoption by any board,  
            department, or office within the agency (Health and Safety  
            Code § 57004).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown. 

           COMMENTS  :   

           Need for the bill  :  According to the author, SB 1117 allows the  
          California DPR to better ensure that harmful pesticides stay out  
          of California's groundwater by enabling DPR to update the  
          statistical method used to identify potential groundwater  
          pollutants and to mitigate or cancel the use of a pesticide if  
          its breakdown product is found to pollute groundwater. 

          According to the DPR, "The Pesticide Contamination Prevention  
          Act, passed in 1984, is the cornerstone of California's  
          pesticide groundwater protection program, requiring DPR to  
          collect and analyze data on all pesticides registered for  
          agricultural use in California and to identify and monitor  
          potential groundwater contaminants. The law also calls on DPR to  
          cancel or mitigate the use of a pesticide once it is found to  
          pollute groundwater as the result of legal agricultural use. 

          However, when the law was passed 30 years ago, it specified the  
          scientific method DPR must use to determine which pesticides may  
          move to groundwater.  Since that time, new methods have been  
          developed that can better predict a pesticide's mobility.  Also,  
          at the time of passage of the Act, the technology did not exist  
          to detect a pesticide's breakdown, or degradation, product.  
          Therefore, under the Act, DPR does not have authority to  
          mitigate or cancel a pesticide if only its breakdown product,  
          and not the pesticide itself, is found to pollute.  

          SB 1117 addresses these two issues by allowing DPR to develop a  
          peer-reviewed method that reflects the best available science to  
          determine which pesticides have the potential to move to  
          groundwater, thus allowing DPR to better focus time and  
          resources on monitoring for those pesticides which actually pose  








                                                                  SB 1117
                                                                  Page  4

          the greatest risk.  Also, the bill requires DPR to review and  
          potentially cancel or modify the use of a pesticide if that  
          pesticide's breakdown products are found in groundwater."

           Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act  :  DPR began addressing  
          pesticide contamination of ground water in the early 1980's  
          after the discovery of contamination from the legal application  
          of the fumigant dibromochloropropane (DBCP).  Reports of  
          additional pesticides in ground water resulted in the passage of  
          the Act in 1985 (AB 2021, [Connelly], Chapter 1298, Statutes of  
          1985). 

          The Act requires DPR to maintain a list of pesticides that have  
          the potential to pollute groundwater called the Ground Water  
          Protection List.  The Act established a set of data requirements  
          for identifying and tracking potential and actual ground water  
          contaminants. As required by the Act, registrants of  
          agricultural use must provide DPR with chemistry and other  
          environmental data for the active ingredients in their pesticide  
          products.  DPR establishes threshold values, or special numeric  
          values, in regulation to distinguish leaching pesticides from  
          non-leaching pesticides. These values were established for water  
          solubility, soil adsorption, hydrolysis half-life, aerobic soil  
          metabolism half-life, and anaerobic soil metabolism half-life.  
          DPR's special numeric values are equal to or more stringent than  
          the values used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   
          Pesticides that exceed the special numeric values and have  
          specified labeled uses will be placed on the Ground Water  
          Protection List (3CCR Section 6800[b]). DPR is required to  
          sample for pesticides on this list to determine if they are  
          present in ground water due to their legal agricultural uses. 

          DPR's Ground Water Protection List is divided into two sublists.  
           Sublist (a) includes seven agricultural herbicides - atrazine,  
          bentazon, bromacil, diuron, norflurazon, prometon, and simazine  
          - that are regulated as ground water contaminants. Sublist (b)  
          includes 101 pesticides that have not yet been detected in  
          ground water but have the potential to become contaminants based  
          on their mobility, persistence, and legal uses.

           Importance of protecting California's groundwater  :  According to  
          the Department of Water Resources, California's groundwater  
          provides approximately 30 to 46 percent of the State's total  
          water supply, depending on wet or dry years.  Some communities  
          in California are 100 percent reliant upon groundwater for urban  








                                                                  SB 1117
                                                                  Page  5

          and agricultural use.  Since 1990, DPR's Environmental  
          Monitoring Branch has sampled more than 1,700 unique wells for  
          91 pesticides and pesticide breakdown products as part of  
          Groundwater Protection List monitoring.
           
           Need for updating the Act  :  SB 1117 would provide DPR  
          flexibility to revise the methodology to determine which  
          pesticides to put on the List to account for scientific  
          advances, layered with a peer review requirement.  Modern  
          statistical methods, such as multivariate analysis, will produce  
          a more accurate prediction of a pesticide's potential to move to  
          groundwater.  DPR is concerned that if a legislative change is  
          not made, some pesticides will remain on the List that are  
          unlikely to pollute groundwater, decreasing DPR's ability to  
          focus resources on pesticides of greater concern.  

          In addition, problems associated with degradation products were  
          not fully realized or understood in the mid-1980's when the Act  
          was passed, and have become more evident with new pesticides  
          whose chemistry is very different than the pesticides that were  
          predominant in the 1980s.  At the time the Act was written, it  
          was technically impossible to detect the difference between a  
          parent product and a degradation product.  Therefore, current  
          statute only allows a pesticide to be put on the List if the  
          pesticide is detected, not if its degradation product is  
          detected.  Advances in technologies, such as mass spectrometer  
          technology, now allow scientists to "see" degradation products  
          where before they could not distinguish between a parent and a  
          breakdown product. These technologies are available and have  
          been used for some time. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support  :  
           
          California Department of Pesticide Regulation (sponsor)
          American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, District  
          IX
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
          Californians for Pesticide Reform
          Clean Water Action
          Community Water Center
          Pesticide Action Network
          Sierra Club California









                                                                  SB 1117
                                                                  Page  6

           Opposition  :  
           
          None received. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :  Paige Brokaw / E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965