BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          SB 1122 (Pavley) - Sustainable communities: Strategic Growth  
          Council.
          
          Amended: May 5, 2014            Policy Vote: EQ 6-0, T&H 9-1
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 19, 2014      Consultant: Marie Liu
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.

          Bill Summary: SB 1122 would allow the Strategic Growth Council  
          (SGC) to manage and award financial assistance, from monies in  
          the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, through a regional granting  
          authority for the implementation of a sustainable communities  
          strategy or alternative planning strategy to reduce greenhouse  
          gas (GHG) emissions. The SGC would also be authorized to award  
          financial assistance to a city, county, or regional agency for  
          the development and implementation of specified land protection  
          plans that reduce GHG emissions.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Unknown ongoing costs, potentially between the mid-hundreds  
              of thousands to low millions, from the Greenhouse Gas  
              Reduction Fund (special) to develop, administer, and oversee  
              financial assistance programs.

          Background: The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006  
          (aka AB 32/act) (Health and Safety Code §38500 et seq.) requires  
          the State Air Resources Board (ARB) to adopt GHG reduction  
          measures to reduce the statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by  
          2020. One of the key AB 32 implementation programs is the  
          Cap-and-Trade Program. Under this program, ARB establishes an  
          overall limit or cap on GHG emissions from specified industries.  
          Facilities subject to the cap may reduce their own emissions or  
          purchase allowances from others to emit GHGs, including from  
          facilities that have reduced emissions more than required.  
          Allowances are auctioned off by ARB. To date, ARB has completed  
          six auctions, resulting in a total of $663 million in proceeds,  
          which are deposited into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. The  
          monies in this fund may only be used to facilitate the  
          achievement of GHG emission reductions in California consistent  
          with AB 32. 









          SB 1122 (Pavley)
          Page 1


          Senate Bill 375 (Steinberg) Chapter 728, Statues of 2008,  
          requires the ARB to provide each region that has a metropolitan  
          planning organization (MPO) with a GHG emission-reduction target  
          for the automobile and light-truck sector for 2020 and 2035,  
          respectively. Each MPO, in turn, is required to include within  
          its regional transportation plan (RTP) a sustainable communities  
          strategy (SCS) or alternative planning scenario (APS) designed  
          to achieve the ARB targets for GHG emission reductions. Each MPO  
          must submit its SCS or APS to ARB for review. ARB must accept or  
          reject the MPO's determination that the SCS or APS would, if  
          implemented, achieve the GHG emissions-reduction targets.

          Proposed Law: This bill would authorize the SGC to administer  
          two grant programs funded by the GHG Reduction Fund. The first  
          program would be to allocate money to a regional granting  
          authority that would grant funds to projects that implement a  
          SCS, APS, or a RTP (only if an SCS is not required for that  
          region). Each region of the state would receive monies on a per  
          capita basis. The regional granting authority could be a council  
          of governments, MPO, or regional transportation planning agency.  


          The SGC would be required to develop guidelines that would  
          direct how the regional granting authority identifies which  
          projects to fund. The guidelines would be required to include,  
          among other things, a requirement that projects be selected  
          through a competitive public process based on the anticipated  
          GHG reductions from that project and methods for evaluating,  
          monitoring, and verifying GHG emission reductions. The SGC would  
          be required to consult with ARB and MPOs to establish standards  
          for modeling and measurement methods to ensure consistency in  
          evaluating the potential effectiveness of projects and verifying  
          actual benefits after project completion.

          This bill would specify that eligible projects include things  
          such as transportation network and demand management; public  
          transportation service; enhancing transit options; clean  
          transportation fueling infrastructure and support; multimodal  
          network connectivity; development and adoption of local plans  
          and land use policies; community infrastructure; multiuse  
          facilities and accommodations for bicyclists, pedestrians, and  
          neighborhood electric vehicles; evaluation, monitoring, and  
          verification systems; and administrative costs. Administrative  
          costs for each "recipient" is limited to five percent of the  








          SB 1122 (Pavley)
          Page 2


          award.

          The second program would be for the SGC to directly award  
          financial assistance to a city, county, city and county, or  
          regional agency for the development and implementation of  
          agricultural, natural resources, and open-space land protection  
          plans that reduce GHG emissions and are consistent with SCS,  
          APOs, or other regional GHG emission reduction plans. 

          Staff Comments: The costs to the SGC to develop, administer, and  
          oversee the grant programs established in this bill would depend  
          on the amount of money that they are dispensing and through  
          which grant program. Typically, administrative costs are  
          approximately 5% of the amount being dispensed. Assuming that  
          the SGC could be delivering at least $10 M of grants,  
          administrative costs could be in the mid-hundreds of thousands  
          to low millions.

          In respect to the regional financial assistance program, the  
          bill specifies a 5% cap on administrative costs for each  
          "recipient." While this cap was intended to limit the  
          administrative costs of the regional granting authority (see the  
          analysis of the Transportation and Committee for this bill),  
          both the regional granting authority and the SGC will incur  
          administrative costs. The SGC's costs would be for the  
          development of the guidelines and to review the regional  
          programs while the regional granting authority's costs would be  
          for project selection and award administration.  Staff recommends   
          that it be clarified that the administrative cost cap would  
          apply to the combined costs of the SGC and the regional granting  
          authority.  

          There is no specified cap on administrative costs for the  
          financial assistance program for land protection plans.