BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1138
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   July 2, 2014

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

                    SB 1138 (Padilla) - As Amended:  June 24, 2014

          Policy Committee:                               
          AgricultureVote:7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill establishes labeling requirements for the sale of fish  
          and shellfish with respect to common species name, whether the  
          fish or shellfish was farm raised or wild, and whether the fish  
          or shellfish was caught domestically or imported.  Specifically,  
          this bill:

          1)Requires the label of any fresh, frozen, or processed fish or  
            shellfish offered for sale at wholesale or retail to clearly  
            identify the species of fish or shellfish by its common name,  
            whether the fish or shellfish was farm raised or wild, and  
            whether the fish or shellfish was caught domestically or  
            imported.  Knowingly selling fish or shellfish in violation of  
            the labeling provision is deemed to constitute misbranding.

          2)Requires a retail food facility to identify the species of  
            fish or shellfish it sells or offers for sale by its common  
            name, and prohibits a retail food facility from knowingly  
            misidentifying the country of origin of the fish or shellfish  
            or whether the fish or shellfish was farm raised or wild.   
            Knowingly misidentifying fish or shellfish is deemed unlawful.

          FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time General Fund costs to the Department of Public Health  
            (DPH) of up to $150,000 to promulgate and amend regulations to  
            implement the provisions of the bill.  One-time General Fund  
            costs to DPH of approximately $170,000 to purchase laboratory  
            equipment needed to test fish and shellfish samples for  
            accurate labeling.









                                                                  SB 1138
                                                                  Page  2

          2)Ongoing General Fund enforcement costs to DPH of approximately  
            $600,000 per year based on 650 spot inspections of retailers  
            to verify compliance, further investigation and DNA testing of  
            100 samples resulting from issues raised in the inspections,  
            and responses to 50 consumer complaints per year.

           COMMENTS  

          1)  Purpose.   According to the author, mislabeling of fish and  
            shellfish can defraud consumers, restaurants, and fishermen  
            when a specific fish or shellfish is ordered but has been  
            substituted with a less expensive, less desirable fish or  
            shellfish.  The author claims mislabeling fish and shellfish  
            can also lead to the consumption of seafood that is unhealthy  
            or dangerous.  For example, certain species of fish may have  
            unhealthy levels of mercury, while shellfish may be illegally  
            harvested from areas deemed too polluted for commercial  
            fishing.

          2)  Oceana Study.   In 2013, the ocean conservation advocacy  
            organization Oceana released a two year study on fish sold for  
            retail in grocery stores and restaurants across the United  
            States, including Northern and Southern California.  Oceana  
            found that 52% of fish was mislabeled in Southern California,  
            which led the nation, and 38% of fish was mislabeled in  
            Northern California.

            Sushi restaurants were the worst offenders, with 95% of sushi  
            restaurants visited in the United States having sold  
            mislabeled fish.  In Southern California, 84% of sushi  
            restaurants visited sold mislabeled fish, while in Northern  
            California the rate was 76%.

            32% of grocery stores and 39% of non-sushi restaurants were  
            found to have sold mislabeled fish in Southern California,  
            while in Northern California 27% of grocery stores and 58% of  
            non-sushi restaurants were found guilty of the practice.

          3)  Stronger Enforcement for Fish and Shellfish.   While current  
            federal and state law generally prohibit mislabeling of fish  
            and shellfish along with other foods, recent studies have  
            shown seafood mislabeling is not strongly enforced.  This bill  
            is intended to address this problem by enacting specific and  
            detailed labeling standards for fish and shellfish while  
            providing protection for unknowing sales of mislabeled fish so  








                                                                  SB 1138
                                                                  Page  3

            long as the unwitting sellers maintain sufficient  
            documentation to demonstrate reliance on previous labeling.

          4)  Suggested Technical Amendment.
           
            On page 3, line 1, insert "or raised" between "caught" and  
            "domestically".


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Joel Tashjian / APPR. / (916) 319-2081