BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






                             SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE
                          Senator William W. Monning, Chair


          SB 1142 (Monning)   Hearing Date:  April 24, 2014  

          As Introduced: February 20, 2014
          Fiscal:             No
          Urgency:       No
          

           SUMMARY    Would clarify that the annual disability fraud fee  
          collected by the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to  
          fund the investigation and prosecution of disability fraud  
          applies to each resident in California covered by an individual  
          or group policy regardless of the situs of the contract or the  
          location of the master policy holder, and  that the disability  
          fraud fee applies to blanket insurance policies regardless of  
          whether an individual certificate of coverage is issued to each  
          covered person under the policy.
          
           
          DIGEST
            
          Existing law
            
           1.  Provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the  
              Insurance Commissioner;

           2.  Requires a disability insurer or other entity liable for any  
              loss due to health insurance fraud doing business in California  
              to pay an annual fee that does not exceed $0.20 per year for  
              each insured under an individual or group policy "it issues in  
              this state" in order to fund increased investigation and  
              prosecution of fraudulent disability insurance claims;

           3.  Provides that after incidental expenses, 30 percent of the  
              funds received shall be distributed to the Fraud Division of the  
              Department of Insurance for enhanced investigative efforts, and  
              70 percent  shall be distributed to local district attorneys for  
              investigation and prosecution of disability insurance fraud  
              cases;

           4.  Defines blanket insurance as a form of insurance that provides  
              coverage for specified circumstances as defined, and insured by  
              description of all or nearly all persons within a class of  




                                               SB 1142 Monning), Page 2




              persons defined in a policy to a master policyholder, and not by  
              naming the persons covered, and for which a certificate of  
              coverage may or may not be provided to eligible persons;

           5.  Authorizes the above-described blanket policies, among others,  
              to provide that the cost of the insurance coverage is required  
              to be paid by either the policyholder, or the individuals  
              insured or their parents or guardians, payable through the  
              policyholder;

           6.  Authorizes the person insured, when the premium is paid for  
              these types of blanket insurance, to request a copy of the  
              policy from the insurer.
           

          Existing regulations
           
            1.  Require each admitted disability insurer to pay a  
              disability insurance fraud assessment of $.20 for each  
              insured person that is covered by an individual or group  
              disability insurance policy issued in this state during each  
              calendar year or any part thereof; 

            2.  Provide that an insured person for these purposes is  
              deemed to include any person that is issued an individual  
              certificate of coverage.

           This bill

            1.  Would clarify that the annual disability fraud fee  
              collected by the CDI to fund the investigation and  
              prosecution of disability fraud applies to each resident in  
              California covered by an individual or group policy  
              regardless of the situs of the contract or the location of  
              the master policy holder; 

           2.  Would clarify that the disability fraud fee applies to  
              blanket insurance policies regardless of whether an  
              individual certificate of coverage is issued to each covered  
              person under the policy.


           COMMENTS

          1.  Purpose of the bill.   To clarify the application and scope  
              of the disability fraud assessment to facilitate the  




                                               SB 1142 Monning), Page 3




              investigation and prosecution of disability insurance fraud  
              by the CDI and local district attorneys, and to ensure that  
              the CDI has adequate resources to investigate and prosecute  
              disability fraud and to make grants for that purpose to  
              local district attorneys. 

           2.  Background  . The disability Insurance fraud assessment was  
              enacted in 1991 to fund investigation and prosecution  
              activities related to health insurance claims fraud.   
              According to SB 894 (Ch. 1008, Statutes of 1991), the  
              Legislature found that "health insurance fraud is a  
              particular problem for health insurance policyholders and is  
              believed to account for billions of dollars annually in  
              added costs of health care nationally.  Premium dollars are  
              lost and health care costs increase unnecessarily."

              The assessment was increased by AB 2138 (Ch. 444, Statutes  
              of 2012) from $.10 to $.20 per covered individual, and the  
              percentage of the fund granted to district attorneys was  
              increased from 50% to 70%. The IC is to apportion funding to  
              district attorneys based on criteria, including a high  
              probability of successful prosecutions.  In Fiscal Year  
              2011-12, five counties received a total of $1,712,000 in  
              funding through the Disability and Healthcare Insurance  
              Fraud Grant Program.  The district attorneys reported 124  
              investigations, 48 arrests, and 43 convictions.  Chargeable  
              fraud amounted to $210,691,543 with $2,456,180 restitution  
              ordered by the courts. 
               
               As a result of the fee increase enacted in 2012, local  
              district attorney funding increased to $6,671,000 for Fiscal  
              Year 2013-14. Ten counties received awards this cycle,  
              including Orange County which received $2.02 million, Los  
              Angeles County which received $1.07 million, and San Diego  
              County which received $875,000. 

              The CDI has interpreted the statute to mean that the  
              assessment is to be applied to all covered persons residing  
              in the state regardless of whether the person is covered  
              under an individual or group policy regardless of the situs  
              of the contract, and including blanket policies. 

              The CDI's Fraud Disability and Health Assessment Data Call  
              instructs companies to include blanket insurance in their  
              covered lives total for group plans. The instructions are as  
              follows: "Provide Covered Lives and Direct Earned Premium on  




                                               SB 1142 Monning), Page 4




              group policies that provide coverage, singly or in  
              combination, for death, dismemberment, disability or  
              hospital and medical care caused or necessitated as a result  
              of accident or specified kinds of accidents. Types of  
              coverage include: sports accident, travel accident, blanket  
              accident, specific accident or accidental death or  
              dismemberment."

              According to the CDI, many insurers have routinely paid the  
              assessment on covered California residents, regardless of  
              the situs of the contract, and on blanket policies where no  
              individual certificates had been issued. Recently, however,  
              some insurers have challenged the obligation to pay the  
              assessment on California residents who are covered under a  
              group policy not issued within California, or individuals  
              covered under a blanket insurance policy when the  
              individuals are not issued individual certificates of  
              coverage. The increase in the fee may have prompted some  
              insurers to more closely examine the statute and determine  
              they could legally argue they were not obligated to pay  
              under a strict reading of the language regarding both situs  
              of the contract, and issuance of individual certificates  
              under blanket insurance master policies. The CDI is  
              concerned that such an interpretation would dramatically  
              reduce the funds available to investigate and prosecute  
              fraudulent health and disability claims.


           3.  Support  .  According to the author, this bill will ensure  
              that the disability fraud assessment fee will apply to  
              insurers equally regardless of the location of the master  
              contract, and that adequate resources are provided to the  
              CDI, and particularly local district attorneys, to  
              aggressively investigate and prosecute health insurance  
              fraud. Disability fraud is not bound by the location of the  
              issuer, but the location of the claimant.

              According to the CDI, the changes made by this bill are  
              necessary to more closely align the statute with the  
              original intent, the CDI's current practice, and provide  
              further clarification for insurers who are subject to this  
              assessment. In addition, the proposed change would ensure  
              that the CDI has the resources to continue investigating and  
              prosecuting fraudulent disability claims, which can occur in  
              California regardless of where a group policy is issued.





                                               SB 1142 Monning), Page 5




              Alameda District Attorney Nancy O'Malley supports SB 1142  
              because it is essential to continue the efforts of her  
              office, the other 57 prosecutor offices and the CDI in their  
              efforts to combat disability fraud through investigation and  
              prosecution. The funds available through this program have  
              been an invaluable resource to her office in combating  
              disability and health fraud. In 2013, the Alameda District  
              Attorney's office investigated 22 cases of disability and  
              health fraud involving 26 perpetrators, with a total loss of  
              $1,052,811. Of those cases resolved in 2013, they have  
              secured $165,167 in restitution orders. 

              San Diego County District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis supports  
              SB 1142 because when insurers challenge their assessments  
              there is an immediate and significant decrease in the fraud  
              funds which diminishes the Fraud Division's ability to  
              investigate and prosecute insurance fraud.

           4.  Opposition    None has been received by the committee,  
              although the Association of California Life and Health  
              Insurance Companies is concerned that this proposal does not  
              codify current practice, but expands the scope of the  
              assessment currently authorized under existing law.  In  
              certain group and blanket coverage situations, the residence  
              state of the policy/certificate holder is not known, and may  
              not be available from a systems standpoint. Their concerns  
              are primarily with technical/administrative feasibility.   
              Discussions are continuing with the CDI on how to address  
              these concerns.
           
          5.  Questions    How have insurers determined the number of  
              covered persons under a blanket insurance policy for  
              purposes of this assessment when no individual certificate  
              has been issued? Is it likely the intent of the statute was  
              to exclude a significant number of California residents  
              covered under group disability policies from application of  
              the assessment? 

           6.  Prior and Related Legislation   

              AB 1401 (Aghazarian) (Ch. 335, Statutes of 2007) increased  
              the maximum per company general assessment CDI may annually  
              charge insurance companies to combat insurance fraud from  
              $1,300 to $5,100;

              AB 2138 (Blumenfield) ( Ch. 444, Statutes of 2012) increased  




                                               SB 1142 Monning), Page 6




              the maximum annual special purpose assessment on disability  
              insurers to investigate health insurance fraud from $.10 to  
              $.20 annually for each insured under an individual or group  
              insurance policy it issues in this state to fund increased  
              investigation and prosecution of fraudulent disability  
              insurance claims.

              AB 2084 (Solorio) (Ch. 321, Statutes of 2012) expanded the  
              types of blanket insurance that may be offered by  
              California-admitted insurers.

           




          POSITIONS
          
          Support
           
          California Department of Insurance (sponsor)
          California District Attorneys Association
          Alameda County District Attorney
          San Diego County District Attorney
          Santa Clara County District Attorney
          NCFIA Anti-Fraud Alliance
           
          Oppose
               
          None received

          Consultant:   Erin Ryan (916) 651-4110