BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1249|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 1249
Author: Hill (D)
Amended: 8/22/14
Vote: 21
SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE : 5-1, 4/30/14
AYES: Hill, Hancock, Jackson, Leno, Pavley
NOES: Fuller
NO VOTE RECORDED: Gaines
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 4-2, 5/23/14
AYES: De León, Hill, Padilla, Steinberg
NOES: Walters, Gaines
NO VOTE RECORDED: Lara
SENATE FLOOR : 23-12, 5/28/14
AYES: Beall, Block, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier,
Evans, Hancock, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leno,
Lieu, Liu, Mitchell, Monning, Padilla, Pavley, Steinberg,
Torres, Wolk
NOES: Anderson, Berryhill, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Huff,
Knight, Morrell, Nielsen, Vidak, Walters, Wyland
NO VOTE RECORDED: Calderon, Galgiani, Roth, Wright, Yee
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 61-16, 8/27/14 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Hazardous waste: shredder waste
SOURCE : Author
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
2
DIGEST : This bill authorizes the Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) to adopt regulations establishing
management standards for hazardous waste management activities
at metal shredding facilities until January 1, 2018.
Assembly Amendments authorize the alternative management
standards, as specified, to allow for treated metal shredder
waste to be classified and managed as nonhazardous waste; delete
the requirements that metal and treated metal shredder residue
must be disposed of in a specified manner; establish Hazardous
Waste Control Account; allow specified regulations to be adopted
as emergency regulations; authorize DTSC to collect an annual
fee from all metal shredding facilities that are subject to the
regulation to cover DTSC's costs for implementation; repeal an
existing requirement of regional water quality control boards,
and make minor and technical changes.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
1.Under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) of 1976, governs the disposal of hazardous waste:
A. Through regulation, sets standards for the treatment,
storage, transport, tracking and disposal of hazardous
waste in the United States.
B. Authorizes states to carry out many of the functions of
the federal law through their own hazardous waste laws if
such programs have been approved by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
1.Under the California Hazardous Waste Control Act (HWCA) of
1972:
A. Establishes the Hazardous Waste Control program.
B. Regulates the appropriate handling, processing and
disposal of hazardous and extremely hazardous waste to
protect the public, livestock, and wildlife from hazards to
health and safety.
C. Implements federal tracking requirements for the
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
3
handling and transportation of hazardous waste from the
point of waste generation to the point of ultimate
disposition.
D. Establishes a system of fees to cover the costs of
operating the hazardous waste management program.
E. Authorizes the DTSC to enforce federal law and
regulations under the RCRA.
F. Requires the DTSC to grant and review permits and
enforce the HWCA requirements for hazardous waste
treatment, storage and disposal facilities.
1.Under the Integrated Waste Management Act, requires materials
that require special handling, as defined, to be removed from
major appliances and vehicles in which they are contained
before crushing for transport or transferring to a baler or
shredder for recycling.
This bill:
1.Defines "metal shredding facility" as an operation that uses a
shredding technique to process end-of-life vehicles,
appliances, and other forms of scrap metal to facilitate the
separation and sorting of ferrous metals, nonferrous metals,
and other recyclable materials from nonrecyclable materials.
2.Authorizes DTSC, in consultation with the Department of
Resources Recycling and Recovery, the State Water Resources
Control Board and affected local air quality management
districts, until January 1, 2018, to adopt regulations
establishing management standards for metal shredding
facilities for hazardous waste management activities as an
alternative to current statutory hazardous waste management
requirements and regulations.
3.Requires DTSC, before adopting regulations to establish
alternative management standards, to first prepare an analysis
evaluating the hazardous waste management activities to which
alternative management standards will apply.
4.Prohibits DTSC from adopting management standards that are
less stringent than applicable standards under federal law.
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
4
5.Authorizes the alternative management standards, to the extent
it is consistent with the standards that will otherwise apply
under the federal act, to allow for treated metal shredder
waste to be classified and managed as nonhazardous waste.
6.Allows treated metal shredder waste being classified as
nonhazardous waste pursuant to the alternative management
standards to be managed as either alternative daily cover, or
for beneficial reuse, or placed in a unit that meet specified
state waste discharge requirements.
7.Determines all hazardous waste determinations and policies,
procedures or guidance issued by DTSC before January 1, 2014,
governing treated metal shredder waste to be inoperative if or
when DTSC completes its analysis and either adopts new
regulations establishing alternative management standards or
rescinds the existing conditional nonhazardous waste
classifications.
8.Sunsets DTSC's authority to complete the analysis and adopt
regulations relating to metal shredder waste on January 1,
2018.
9.Authorizes DTSC to collect an annual fee from all metal
shredding facilities that are subject to the regulation to
cover DTSC's costs for implementation. This bill also
establishes a separate subaccount in the Hazardous Waste
Control Account and requires the fees to be deposited into the
account, to be available upon appropriation by the
Legislature, and authorizes regulations relating to fee
provisions to be adopted as emergency regulations.
10.Allows treated metal shredder waste to be deemed a solid
waste if managed pursuant to the alternative management
standards adopted by DTSC and is accepted by a solid waste
landfill or other authorized location for disposal or for use
as alternative daily cover or other beneficial reuses.
11.Repeals a provision of existing law that required specified
regional water quality control boards to prepare a list of
specified types of landfills that are authorized to accept and
dispose of shredder waste
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
5
Background
Auto/metal shredding and recycling . The shredding of
automobiles and major household appliances is a process where a
hammer mill grinds the materials fed into it to fist-size
pieces. The shredding of automobiles results in a mixture of
ferrous metal, non-ferrous metal (e.g. alloys of copper and
aluminum) and shredder waste, referred to as automobile shredder
waste (ASW).
This waste is composed of the plastics, rubber, foam, residual
metal pieces, paper, fabric, glass, wire, hoses, rubber gaskets,
sand, dirt and other non-metallic waste that remains from
recycled automobiles, trucks, buses, and household appliances.
ASW contains heavy metals (lead, copper, zinc and cadmium),
chlorine and PCBs, as well as other hazardous chemicals.
After shredding, some ASW is treated using metals fixation
treatment technologies, coating the waste in cement to "fix" the
hazardous constituents in the waste. It is referred to as
"fluff" and distributed to landfills across the state to be used
as alternative daily cover.
Roughly 700,000 tons of this waste -- also called fluff -- is
disposed of in the state's landfills each year. According to
the CalRecycle records, 6,056,026 tons of ASW has been disposed
in California landfills between 1998 and 2007.
ASW as hazardous waste . Prior to 1984, all ASW was considered
not to be hazardous waste and was disposed of or used as
alternative daily cover in municipal solid waste landfills.
In 1984, California deemed ASW as a non-RCRA hazardous waste (or
California hazardous waste) due to the presence of lead,
cadmium, copper and zinc at levels above the state's regulatory
thresholds, as well as PCBs at concentrations which on some
occasions exceeded either/both the federal and California
regulatory thresholds.
Between 1986 and 1992, California's Department of Health
Services (DHS) Toxic Substances Control Division (predecessor to
DTSC) issued conditional nonhazardous waste classifications
(also referred to as "f letters") to seven shredder facilities
in California who treated their ASW to fix the hazardous
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
6
components into the waste. Once facility operators received a
nonhazardous waste classification, treated ASW was no longer
regulated as a hazardous waste.
In 1988, California's regulation of ASW was formalized in the
DHS Policy and Procedure 88-6.
In early 2001, the DTSC began an initiative to evaluate the
adequacy of the ASW policy, which included new sampling and
analysis. The report from that initiative recommended
rescinding the conditional nonhazardous waste classifications.
However, the DTSC took no further action.
Environmental and public health incidents caused by shredder
facilities . In 2002, the DTSC issued an "imminent and
substantial endangerment" order against Pacific Steel, because
dust blowing from contaminated piles of waste stored out in the
open, which contained PCBs and toxic metals such as lead, zinc
and copper, polluted and threatened to pollute the air and water
near the facility. In 2011, the DTSC issued a remedial action
order against Pacific Steel to clean up the site.
In 2011, the DTSC settled an enforcement action against the Sims
Metal West and S.A. Recycling facility in Anaheim for $2.9
million. The action alleged that S.A. Recycling violated air
pollution laws when an explosion at its San Pedro facility at
Terminal Island destroyed its air pollution control system in
May 2007 and the company continued operating for weeks without
proper equipment. As a result, approximately 4.4 tons of toxic
particulates were released to the air, and migrated to bay
waters and the community of Wilmington, putting local residents
and the environment at risk.
At a 13-acre bay front site in Redwood City, Sims Metal
Management shreds about 300,000 automobiles a year, along with
appliances and other metal products, and loads the materials via
huge conveyor belts onto ships bound for China, Korea and other
countries, where they are made into new products.
In January 2012, Sims Metal Management in Redwood City was cited
by the US EPA for polluting the San Francisco Bay. Inspectors
found the company had unlawfully discharged PCBs, lead, copper,
mercury and zinc into Redwood Creek, a tributary of San
Francisco Bay. The US EPA found PCB levels of 195 times
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
7
accepted levels and more than 10 times accepted levels of lead
in sediment near where the shredding yard meets the Redwood
Creek. This enforcement action was resolved in 2013.
Additionally, there have been several fires in the last several
years at the Sims Redwood City facility that have caused the Bay
Area Air Quality Management District to ask residents to stay
inside. Two fires occurred in November and December of 2013,
raising concerns about the proximity of this facility to
residents.
In the fire in December 2013, no one was reported injured by the
smoke or fire, which was limited to a debris pile about 900
square feet in area and 30 feet tall, but the noxious odor
produced by the blaze was detected as far south as South San
Jose and across the bay in Oakland and Berkeley.
The company's recycling facilities in Hayward and San Francisco
experienced fires in 2009 and 2010 respectively, according to
records from the District.
ASW regulatory review . In 2002, the DTSC conducted an auto
shredder initiative that found both treated and untreated
shredder waste exceeded state regulatory thresholds for lead,
zinc and cadmium. The report recommended that the DTSC policy
and procedure that allowed the exemption for this waste be
rescinded and the waste stream be regulated as hazardous waste.
No action was taken at that time.
In 2008, the DTSC sent letters to shredders expressing the
department's intention to rescind Policy and Procedure 88-6 and
repeal the conditional authorization that allows ASW to be
classified as non-hazardous waste. However, the DTSC has not to
date rescinded the conditional waste classifications.
The DTSC is currently reviewing technical data about current and
potential chemical treatments of metal shredder residue in order
to reevaluate its prior waste classification decisions. In
addition, the DTSC is inviting input from the public. The DTSC
will develop a course of action based on the findings of this
process.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: Yes
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
8
According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:
Increased one-time costs to DTSC of approximately $200,000
(Hazardous Waste Control Account) to perform fee rulemaking
and the treatability study.
Increased ongoing costs to DTSC of approximately $450,000
(Hazardous Waste Control Account) for rulemaking, compliance
and ongoing administration.
This bill provides fee authority to cover costs.
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/27/14)
California League of Conservation Voters
Coalition for Clean Air
Environmental Working Group
Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries
Natural Resources Defense Council
SA Recycling
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, metal
and recycling facilities operating in California pose a distinct
risk to public health and the environment and the hazards
associated with these operations are not adequately regulated.
Many of these facilities are located in highly populated areas
and have been found to have contaminated air and water
surrounding their facilities.
The author states that six fires have broken out at metal
shredding and recycling facilities in the Bay Area since 2007,
five of them at facilities owned by Sims Metal Management LTD.
Three occurred at the company's facility in Redwood City,
causing plumes of smoke to billow over the city impacting the
health of the residents of Redwood City. The Counties of San
Mateo, Alameda and Santa Clara had to issue health advisories
because of the smoke and school districts were forced to keep
students inside because of the poor air quality.
The author asserts that after the last two fires in November and
December of 2013, Redwood City leaders called on regulators to
do more to help protect residents from future incidents.
CONTINUED
SB 1249
Page
9
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 61-16, 8/27/14
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Ammiano, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla,
Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau,
Chesbro, Cooley, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman,
Fong, Frazier, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray,
Hall, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine,
Linder, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,
Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Pan, Perea, John A. Pérez, V.
Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas,
Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Weber, Wieckowski,
Williams, Yamada, Atkins
NOES: Allen, Bigelow, Chávez, Conway, Donnelly, Fox, Beth
Gaines, Grove, Hagman, Logue, Mansoor, Olsen, Patterson,
Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Gorell, Harkey, Vacancy
RM:AL:e:n 8/27/14 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****
CONTINUED