BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  August 29, 2014


                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                                Raul Bocanegra, Chair

                    SB 1271 (Evans) - As Amended:  August 27, 2014


           SENATE VOTE  :   Not relevant
           
          SUBJECT  :  Personal income tax law:  cancellation of  
          indebtedness:  student loan forgiveness

           SUMMARY  :  Excludes loan amounts repaid by the United States  
          Secretary of Education (SSE) or canceled pursuant to Education  
          Code Section 1098e from gross income.  Specifically,  this bill  :   
           

          1)Excludes, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1,  
            2014, loan amounts repaid by the SSE or canceled pursuant to  
            Education Code Section 1098e from gross income.

          2)Takes effect immediately as a tax levy.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides that "gross income" includes all income from whatever  
            source derived, including compensation for services, business  
            income, gains from property, interest, dividends, rents, and  
            royalties, unless specifically excluded.

          2)Provides that in the case of an individual, gross income does  
            not include any amount which would be included by reason of  
            discharge of any student debt if such discharge was pursuant  
            to a provision of such loan under which all or part of the  
            indebtedness of the individual would be discharged if the  
            individual worked for a certain period of time in certain  
            professions for any of a broad class of employers.  (Internal  
            Revenue Code (IRC) Section 108(f).)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB),  
          under the federal income-based repayment programs, the first  
          year that qualified student debt may be forgiven is 2019; thus,  
          there would be no revenue impact prior to fiscal year (FY)  








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  2

          2018-19.  Based on a proration of an estimate prepared by the  
          Joint Committee on Taxation, it is estimated that the revenue  
          loss from this bill would be approximately $5,000 in FY 2018-19,  
          gradually increasing to a loss of approximately $100,000 by FY  
          2023-24.

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)Author's Statement  .  The author has provided the following  
            statement in support of this bill:

               SB 1003 will ensure that California tax law does not  
               penalize taxpayers whose federal student loan debt is  
               forgiven pursuant to federal law.  Senator Evans, sponsor  
               of SB 1003, is deeply concerned about the burden that  
               student loan debt places on Californians.  SB 1003 is a  
               modest step toward helping alleviate the crushing,  
               long-term financial burden of a college education for  
               Californians

           2)Federal Income-Based Repayment (IBR) Programs  .  The IBR plan  
            is a repayment plan for the federal student loans made under  
            the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program and the  
            William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (DL) program that allows  
            borrowers to make payments based on their federal student loan  
            debt and their discretionary income.  A borrower qualifies for  
            IBR if he or she has a "partial financial hardship," which may  
            occur if total annual payments, as calculated according to a  
            standard 10-year repayment schedule, are greater than 15% of  
            the amount by which the borrower's adjusted gross (AGI) income  
            exceeds 150% of the poverty line applicable to the borrower's  
            family size.  If a borrower's AGI increases to the point where  
            the borrower no longer has a partial financial hardship, the  
            borrower's monthly payment will increase to the amount that  
            would have been required based on a standard 10-year repayment  
            schedule.  If the borrower has a federal student loan balance  
            remaining after repaying according to the IBR plan of 25  
            years, the remaining balance will be forgiven.
             
             In 2010, the IBR program was modified for student borrowing  
            qualified educational loans on or after January 1, 2014.  The  
            threshold to qualify for IBR and setting the maximum monthly  
            payment was reduced from 15% of income that exceeds 150% of  
            the poverty line to 10% of income that exceeds 150% of the  
            poverty line.  The IBR program was also modified to reduce the  








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  3

            IBR repayment program from 25 years to 20 years for new  
            borrowers.  
             
           3)Taxable/Non-Taxable IBR Loan Forgiveness  .  In general, the IBR  
            program allows borrowers to have their loans forgiven after 20  
            or 25 years, depending on when the loans were taken out.   
            Existing law defines "gross income" as including all income  
            from whatever source derived unless specifically excluded.   
            IRC Section 108(f) provides that gross income does not include  
            a discharge of student debt if it is dependent upon the  
            borrower working for a certain period of time in certain  
            professions for a broad class of employers.
             
             Under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program,  
            individuals are encouraged to enter full-time public service  
            employment by forgiving the remaining balance of their  
            qualifying student loans after they have made 120 qualifying  
            payments while employed full-time by a public service  
            organization or governmental entity.  As such, loans forgiven  
            as part of the PSLF program are not taxable because the  
            program requires a borrower to work for certain employers for  
            a specified period of time.  On the other hand, because the  
            IBR program, by itself, does not require a borrower to work  
            for a specified period of time or for a specified employer,  
            loans forgiven after the 20 or 25 year payment plan are  
            includible in gross income and subject to tax.  
             
           4)What Does this Bill Do  ?  As noted above, loan forgiveness  
            under one of the IBR programs, by itself, is subject to tax.   
            This bill would exclude, for state tax purposes, loan amounts  
            repaid by the SSE or canceled pursuant to Education Code  
            Section 1098e from gross income.  Education Code Section 1098e  
            includes all loans covered under the IBR plan.  Providing an  
            exclusion from gross income would allow borrowers to have  
            their loans forgiven after the 20 or 25 year period without  
            paying income tax on the forgiven loan amount.

           5)Why Now  ?  This bill excludes the discharge of student loan  
            debt under the IBR plan from gross income.  According to the  
            FTB, the first year that qualified student loan debt may be  
            forgiven is 2019, and the estimated revenue loss for FY  
            2018-19 will be $5,000.  Because this bill will have no impact  
            until FY 2018-19, it may be more appropriate to have the bill  
            move through the normal legislative process instead of  
            amending a bill during the last few days of session.








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  4


           6)Rationale of Taxing Forgiven Debt  .  The practice of taxing  
            debt cancellation reflects sound tax policy because it  
            recognizes the fact that an individual's net worth has  
            increased by the cancellation of debt.  According to  
            Commissioner v. Glenshaw, the Court defined "income" as an  
            accession to wealth that is clearly realized and over which  
            the taxpayer has complete dominion.  (Commissioner v. Glenshaw  
            Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955).)  When debt is cancelled,  
            money that would have been used to pay that loan is now free  
            to be used on whatever the taxpayer wants.  Therefore, because  
            certain assets have been freed, the taxpayer has experienced  
            an accession to wealth.  Additionally, under the rule of  
            symmetry, a loan is not considered income to the borrower nor  
            is it a deduction to the lender.  A borrower's increased  
            wealth when the loan is taken out is also offset by the  
            obligation to pay the same amount.  If the debt is cancelled,  
            the symmetry is destroyed.  The borrower is in a much better  
            position after the debt is cancelled.  Additionally, as noted  
            by Debora A. Grier, Professor of Law of Cleveland State  
            University, in her statement before the United States Senate  
            Committee on Finance, without this tax rule, "the borrower  
            will have received permanently tax-free cash in the year of  
            the original receipt," i.e. the year in which the borrower  
            received the loan.  

           7)Out of Conformity  .  As noted above, California conforms to  
            federal law with respect to the taxability of student loan  
            forgiveness.  In general, state conformity with federal law  
            promotes greater simplicity and eases administration of  
            complex tax laws.  By excluding all loan amounts repaid by the  
            SSE or cancelled pursuant to Education Code Section 1098e from  
            gross income, this bill would take California out of  
            conformity with federal law.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

          Support 
           
          None on file
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file









                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  5

           Analysis Prepared by  :  Carlos Anguiano / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098