BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  1


          (  Without Reference to File  )

          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1271 (Evans)
          As Amended  August 27, 2014
          Majority vote.  Tax levy 

           SENATE VOTE  :Vote not relevant

           REVENUE & TAXATION  9-0                                         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bocanegra, Harkey, Beth   |     |                          |
          |     |Gaines, Gordon, Mullin,   |     |                          |
          |     |Nestande, Pan,            |     |                          |
          |     |V. Manuel Pérez, Ting     |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Excludes loan amounts repaid by the United States  
          Secretary of Education (SSE) or canceled pursuant to Education  
          Code Section 1098(e) from gross income.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :   

          1)Excludes, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1,  
            2014, loan amounts repaid by the SSE or canceled pursuant to  
            Education Code Section 1098(e) from gross income.

          2)Takes effect immediately as a tax levy.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides that "gross income" includes all income from whatever  
            source derived, including compensation for services, business  
            income, gains from property, interest, dividends, rents, and  
            royalties, unless specifically excluded.

          2)Provides that in the case of an individual, gross income does  
            not include any amount which would be included by reason of  
            discharge of any student debt if such discharge was pursuant  
            to a provision of such loan under which all or part of the  
            indebtedness of the individual would be discharged if the  
            individual worked for a certain period of time in certain  
            professions for any of a broad class of employers.  (Internal  
            Revenue Code (IRC) Section 108(f).)








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  2



           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB),  
          under the federal income-based repayment programs, the first  
          year that qualified student debt may be forgiven is 2019; thus,  
          there would be no revenue impact prior to fiscal year (FY)  
          2018-19.  Based on a proration of an estimate prepared by the  
          Joint Taxation Committee, it is estimated that the revenue loss  
          from this bill would be approximately $5,000 in FY 2018-19,  
          gradually increasing to a loss of approximately $100,000 by FY  
          2023-24.

           COMMENTS  :  The author has provided the following statement in  
          support of this bill:

               SB 1003 will ensure that California tax law does not  
               penalize taxpayers whose federal student loan debt is  
               forgiven pursuant to federal law.  Senator Evans,  
               sponsor of SB 1003, is deeply concerned about the  
               burden that student loan debt places on Californians.   
               SB 1003 is a modest step toward helping alleviate the  
               crushing, long-term financial burden of a college  
               education for Californians

          Federal Income-Based Repayment (IBR) Programs.  The IBR plan is  
          a repayment plan for the federal student loans made under the  
          Federal Family Education Loan program and the William D. Ford  
          Federal Direct Loan (DL) program that allows borrowers to make  
          payments based on their federal student loan debt and their  
          discretionary income.  A borrower qualifies for IBR if he or she  
          has a "partial financial hardship," which may occur if total  
          annual payments, as calculated according to a standard 10-year  
          repayment schedule, are greater than 15% of the amount by which  
          the borrower's adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeds 150% of the  
          poverty line applicable to the borrower's family size.  If a  
          borrower's AGI increases to the point where the borrower no  
          longer has a partial financial hardship, the borrower's monthly  
          payment will increase to the amount that would have been  
          required based on a standard 10-year repayment schedule.  If the  
          borrower has a federal student loan balance remaining after  
          repaying according to the IBR plan of 25 years, the remaining  
          balance will be forgiven.

          In 2010, the IBR program was modified for student borrowing  
          qualified educational loans on or after January 1, 2014.  The  








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  3


          threshold to qualify for IBR and setting the maximum monthly  
          payment was reduced from 15% of income that exceeds 150% of the  
          poverty line to 10% of income that exceeds 150% of the poverty  
          line.  The IBR program was also modified to reduce the IBR  
          repayment program from 25 years to 20 years for new borrowers.

          Taxable/Non-Taxable IBR Loan Forgiveness.  In general, the IBR  
          program allows borrowers to have their loans forgiven after 20  
          or 25 years, depending on when the loans were taken out.   
          Existing law defines "gross income" as including all income from  
          whatever source derived unless specifically excluded.  IRC  
          Section 108(f) provides that gross income does not include a  
          discharge of student debt if it is dependent upon the borrower  
          working for a certain period of time in certain professions for  
          a broad class of employers.

          Under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, individuals  
          are encouraged to enter full-time public service employment by  
          forgiving the remaining balance of their qualifying student  
          loans after they have made 120 qualifying payments while  
          employed full-time by a public service organization or  
          governmental entity.  As such, loans forgiven as part of the  
          PSLF program are not taxable because the program requires a  
          borrower to work for certain employers for a specified period of  
          time.  On the other hand, because the IBR program, by itself,  
          does not require a borrower to work for a specified period of  
          time or for a specified employer, loans forgiven after the 20 or  
          25 year payment plan are includible in gross income and subject  
          to tax.

          What Does this Bill Do?  As noted above, loan forgiveness under  
          one of the IBR programs, by itself, is subject to tax.  This  
          bill would exclude, for state tax purposes, loan amounts repaid  
          by the SSE or canceled pursuant to Education Code Section  
          1098(e) from gross income.  Education Code Section 1098(e)  
          includes all loans covered under the IBR plan.  Providing an  
          exclusion from gross income would allow borrowers to have their  
          loans forgiven after the 20 or 25 year period without paying  
          income tax on the forgiven loan amount.

          Why Now?  This bill excludes the discharge of student loan debt  
          under the IBR plan from gross income.  According to the FTB, the  
          first year that qualified student loan debt may be forgiven is  
          2019, and the estimated revenue loss for FY 2018-19 will be  








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  4


          $5,000.  Because this bill will have no impact until FY 2018-19,  
          it may be more appropriate to have the bill move through the  
          normal legislative process instead of amending a bill during the  
          last few days of session.

          Rationale of Taxing Forgiven Debt.  The practice of taxing debt  
          cancellation reflects sound tax policy because it recognizes the  
          fact that an individual's net worth has increased by the  
          cancellation of debt.  According to Commissioner v. Glenshaw,  
          the Court defined "income" as an accession to wealth that is  
          clearly realized and over which the taxpayer has complete  
          dominion.  (Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426,  
          431 (1955).)  When debt is cancelled, money that would have been  
          used to pay that loan is now free to be used on whatever the  
          taxpayer wants.  Therefore, because certain assets have been  
          freed, the taxpayer has experienced an accession to wealth.   
          Additionally, under the rule of symmetry, a loan is not  
          considered income to the borrower nor is it a deduction to the  
          lender.  A borrower's increased wealth when the loan is taken  
          out is also offset by the obligation to pay the same amount.  If  
          the debt is cancelled, the symmetry is destroyed.  The borrower  
          is in a much better position after the debt is cancelled.   
          Additionally, as noted by Debora A. Grier, Professor of Law of  
          Cleveland State University, in her statement before the United  
          States Senate Finance Committee, without this tax rule, "the  
          borrower will have received permanently tax-free cash in the  
          year of the original receipt," i.e. the year in which the  
          borrower received the loan.  

          Out of Conformity.  As noted above, California conforms to  
          federal law with respect to the taxability of student loan  
          forgiveness.  In general, state conformity with federal law  
          promotes greater simplicity and eases administration of complex  
          tax laws.  By excluding all loan amounts repaid by the SSE or  
          cancelled pursuant to Education Code Section 1098(e) from gross  
          income, this bill would take California out of conformity with  
          federal law.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Carlos Anguiano / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098 


                                                                FN: 0005582








                                                                  SB 1271
                                                                  Page  5