BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1353
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1353 (Nielsen)
          As Amended  May 15, 2014
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :35-0  
           
           LOCAL GOVERNMENT            8-0 AGRICULTURE         7-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Achadjian, Levine, Alejo, |Ayes:|Eggman, Olsen, Dahle,     |
          |     |Bradford, Gordon,         |     |Pan, Quirk, Salas, Yamada |
          |     |Melendez, Mullin, Rendon  |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Bigelow,           |     |                          |
          |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos,         |     |                          |
          |     |Donnelly, Eggman, Gomez,  |     |                          |
          |     |Holden, Jones, Linder,    |     |                          |
          |     |Pan, Quirk,               |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas, Wagner,    |     |                          |
          |     |Lowenthal                 |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :   Repeals the January 1, 2016, sunset date in the  
          statutes that allow counties to increase the assessed values of  
          Williamson Act land and divert the resulting property tax  
          revenues, making this authority permanent instead of temporary,  
          and makes conforming changes.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Authorizes, pursuant to the California Constitution, the  
            Legislature to promote the conservation, preservation and  
            continued existence of open space lands and provides that when  
            these lands are enforceably restricted to recreation,  
            enjoyment of scenic beauty, use or conservation of natural  
            resources, or production of food or fiber, they must be valued  
            for property tax purposes only on a basis that is consistent  
            with these restrictions and uses.








                                                                  SB 1353
                                                                  Page  2



          2)Creates the Williamson Act, which authorizes cities and  
            counties to enter into agricultural land preservation  
            contracts with landowners who agree to restrict the use of  
            their land for a minimum of 10 years in exchange for lower  
            assessed property tax valuations.  The Division of Land  
            Resource Protection in the Department of Conservation  
            administers the Williamson Act.

          3)Allows a county, if it makes a determination that the state's  
            open space subventions are less than one-half of the county's  
            actual foregone General Fund (GF) property tax revenue, to  
            revise the term for new contracts, and provides the following:

             a)   Contracts shall be for a term of no less than nine years  
               for contracts currently 10 years in length or 18 years for  
               contracts currently 20 years in length;

             b)   Requires each contract to provide, except in the initial  
               year of determination, that on the anniversary date of the  
               contract or such other annual date as specified by the  
               contract, a year shall be added automatically to the  
               initial term, unless notice of nonrenewal is given;

             c)   Specifies that, if additional revenues do not occur, two  
               or three additional years must be added to the contracts on  
               their next anniversary date, as necessary, to restore them  
               to their full 10-year and 20-year terms;

             d)   Requires a county's actual foregone property tax revenue  
               to be based on the county's respective share of the general  
               property tax dollars as reflected in the most recent annual  
               report issued by the State Board of Equalization or 20%,  
               whichever is higher;

             e)   Requires, in any year in which reduced contract terms  
               and increased assessments are implemented, a county to  
               record a notice that states the affected parcel number(s)  
               and current owner's names, or the same information for  
               those parcels that are not affected;

             f)   Requires an addition to the assessed value to be  
               conveyed to the auditor, consistent with the 10% reduction  
               in the length of the restriction, equal to 10% of the  








                                                                  SB 1353
                                                                  Page  3


               difference between the valuations, as specified.  The  
               increased amount of tax revenue that results from the  
               decrease in restriction shall be separately displayed on  
               the taxpayer's annual bill;

             g)   Allows a landowner to serve a notice of nonrenewal  
               instead of accepting a shortened contact.  A landowner may  
               serve notice of nonrenewal at any time; however, a  
               landowner who withdraws that notice prior to the effective  
               date shall be subject to term modification and additional  
               assessed value, as specified;

             h)   Requires a county to give timely written notice to  
               Williamson Act landowners regarding: any initial hearing by  
               the county on a proposal to adopt or rescind the contract  
               and revaluation provisions; any final decision regarding  
               the adoption or rescission of contract and revaluation  
               provisions; and, the landowner's right to prevent contract  
               amendments through nonrenewal, as specified;

             i)   Specifies that contract modifications and increased  
               assessments do not apply to:  contracts that have been  
               nonrenewed; contracts with cities; open space or  
               agricultural easements; scenic restrictions; wildlife  
               habitat contracts; and, atypical term contracts, as  
               specified;

             j)   Prohibits a county from modifying or revaluing a  
               contract, unless the landowner is given at least 90 days'  
               notice of the opportunity for nonrenewal and the landowner  
               fails to nonrenew, as specified.  Until February 1, 2012,  
               the 90-day notice requirement may be reduced to 60 days if  
               the county adopts a procedure to allow landowners to serve  
               a notice of nonrenewal;

             aa)  States that a landowner's failure to provide notice of  
               nonrenewal is implied consent to the contract and  
               revaluation provisions for that year;

             bb)  Requires that the increased revenues generated by  
               properties that are subject to contract and revaluation  
               provisions be allocated exclusively to the counties in  
               which those properties are located; and,









                                                                  SB 1353
                                                                  Page  4


             cc)  Sunsets contract modification and revaluation provisions  
               on January 1, 2016. 


           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)Negligible immediate state GF impact because schools receive  
            the same amount of property tax revenues regardless of whether  
            counties participate in the program.  Although the bill allows  
            for an increase in the assessed valuation of Williamson Act  
            properties, participating counties retain any increase in  
            property tax revenues. 

          2)In the long run, unknown potential GF impacts, either positive  
            or negative, to the extent that a county stays under contract  
            rather than non-renews, or alternatively, a county non-renews  
            sooner due to the shorter contract lengths allowed under this  
            bill.  Under non-renewal, schools receive an increase in  
            property tax revenues when the contract expires and the  
            assessed valuation increases accordingly.  When the school  
            share of property tax revenue increases, there is a  
            corresponding reduction in GF obligations related to the  
            minimum funding guarantees in Proposition 98 of 1988.

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)Background.  The Williamson Act conserves agricultural and  
            open space land by allowing private property owners to sign  
            voluntary contracts with counties and cities, enforceably  
            restricting their land to agriculture, open space, and  
            compatible uses.  In return, county assessors must reduce the  
            assessed value of the contracted lands to reflect their use as  
            agriculture or open space instead of assessing them at market  
            value.  Approximately 16.6 million acres are under Williamson  
            Act contracts.  Williamson Act contracts generally run for 10  
            years, but the duration is 20 years under more restrictive  
            Farmland Security Zones.  The contracts automatically renew  
            each year, unless an action is taken to non-renew or cancel  
            the contract, as specified.

            The state historically provided subvention payments from the  
            GF to counties for the loss of county GF resources related to  
            lands under Williamson Act contracts.  However, when Governor  








                                                                 SB 1353
                                                                  Page  5


            Schwarzenegger's proposed 2003-04 Budget sought to save  
            approximately $39 million by ending the state subventions, the  
            Legislative Analyst's Office recommended a 10-year phase-out.   
            The first cuts came in 2008-09 when a budget trailer bill  
            reduced the state subventions by 10%.  The Legislature's  
            2009-10 Budget reduced the subventions to $27.8 million.   
            However, Governor Schwarzenegger essentially eliminated the  
            subventions by cutting the appropriation to $1,000.  

            In response to the elimination of subventions for Williamson  
            Act revenue losses, the Legislature passed AB 2530 (Nielsen),  
            Chapter 391, Statutes of 2010, which contained an alternative  
            funding mechanism for the Williamson Act.  AB 2530 allowed  
            county officials to increase the assessed values of Williamson  
            Act land and divert the resulting property tax revenues.  In  
            October 2010, during budget negotiations, the Legislature  
            passed SB 863 (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee), Chapter  
            722, Statutes of 2010, which made minor changes to the  
            provisions of AB 2530.  The budget actions in October 2010  
            also appropriated $10 million from the GF for Williamson Act  
            subventions to counties in 2010-11.  

            However, in March of 2011, the Legislature passed SB 80  
            (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee), Chapter 11, Statutes of  
            2011, which deleted the $10 million appropriation from the GF  
            for Williamson Act subventions to counties in 2010-11.  SB 80  
            also repealed the alternative Williamson Act program that was  
            added by AB 2530 and modified by SB 863.  To allow county  
            officials to continue to implement the program and to allow  
            other counties to participate, the Legislature reenacted the  
            statute without any appropriation, via AB 1265 (Nielsen),  
            Chapter 90, Statutes of 2011.  

            Under current law, as enacted by AB 1265, counties are  
            authorized to reduce the duration of a Williamson Act contract  
            by 10% and increase the assessed value by 10%, if the state's  
            subventions are less than half of a county's foregone property  
            tax revenue.  Contract terms are reduced from 10-year  
            Williamson Act contracts to nine years, and from 20-year  
            Farmland Security Zone contracts to 18 years.  The additional  
            property tax revenues are directed to the county.  The  
            contract continues to be automatically renewed each year,  
            unless the contract is non-renewed or cancelled.  









                                                                  SB 1353
                                                                  Page  6


            The program established by AB 1265 does not apply to contracts  
            that have been non-renewed, contracts with cities, open space  
            or agricultural easements, scenic restrictions, wildlife  
            habitat contracts, or contracts with atypical terms.  These  
            provisions are scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2016.   
            According to the Department of Conservation, 11 counties  
            currently participate in the program enacted by AB 1265.

          2)Purpose of this bill.  This bill repeals the January 1, 2016,  
            sunset date in the statutes that allow counties to increase  
            the assessed values of Williamson Act land and divert the  
            resulting property tax revenues, making this authority  
            permanent instead of temporary, and makes conforming changes.   
            This bill is sponsored by the California Farm Bureau  
            Federation.

          3)Author's statement.  According to the author, "Prior  
            legislation AB 1265 amended the Williamson Act to allow for  
            certain contracts, as specified, between localities and  
            agricultural land owners to last 9 or 18 years, instead of 10  
            or 20 years.  AB 1265 included a 5-year sunset date for these  
            amended contract lengths.  This bill repeals the January 1,  
            2016 sunset clause in that legislation."

          4)Policy consideration.  This bill eliminates, rather than  
            extends, the sunset date on counties' authority to increase  
            the assessed values of Williamson Act land and divert the  
            resulting property tax revenues.  The Legislature may wish to  
            consider whether this authority should be made permanent.  The  
            Legislature may also wish to consider whether it is premature  
            to eliminate or change the sunset, given that it does not go  
            into effect until January 1, 2016.

          5)Arguments in support.  The Rural County Representatives of  
            California (RCRC), in support, note, "SB 1353 would eliminate  
            the sunset date giving counties that opted into the program  
            the ability to continue this alternative funding mechanism for  
            the Williamson Act?The elimination of the sunset would also  
            provide the opportunity for other counties to participate in  
            the program by eliminating the uncertainty created by the  
            sunset.  RCRC is aware of several counties that had determined  
            the cost/benefit of the program was not economically feasible  
            for a short-term fixed duration and SB 1353 would address that  
            concern." 








                                                                  SB 1353
                                                                  Page  7



          6)Arguments in opposition.  None on file.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Angela Mapp / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958 

                                                                FN: 0004441