BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó
                                                                            
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       SB 1395|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING
          Bill No:  SB 1395
          Author:   Block (D)
          Amended:  5/27/14
          Vote:     21
           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/24/14
          AYES:  Hernandez, Morrell, De León, DeSaulnier, Evans, Monning,  
            Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Beall, Nielsen
           SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/30/14
          AYES:  Hill, Gaines, Fuller, Hancock, Jackson, Leno, Pavley
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 5/23/14
          AYES:  De León, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg
           SUBJECT  :    Public beaches:  inspection for contaminants
           SOURCE  :     San Diego County
           DIGEST  :    This bill permits the Department of Public Health  
          (DPH), if a local health officer (LHO) demonstrates that the use  
          of United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)  
          methods, or any equivalent, to determine the level of  
          enterococci bacteria as a single indicator provides a reliable  
          indication overall microbiological contamination conditions in  
          all or part of his/her jurisdiction, to authorize the use of  
          that testing method in that jurisdiction; and permits DPH, in  
          determining whether to authorize the use of those testing  
          methods by an LHO, to take into account whether the alternative  
                                                                CONTINUED
                                                                    SB 1395
                                                                     Page  
          2
          indicators and related test method can provide results more  
          quickly, as specified.
           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:
          1.Makes the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)  
            responsible for directing the state's beach water quality  
            program and for establishing and reviewing monitoring  
            protocols, site locations and monitoring frequency based on  
            risks to public health.
          2.Requires DPH, by regulation in consultation with SWRCB, local  
            health officers (LHOs), and the public, to establish,  
            maintain, and amend as necessary, minimum standards for the  
            sanitation of public beaches, including, but not limited to,  
            the removal of refuse, as it determines are reasonably  
            necessary for the protection of the public health and safety.
          3.Requires the regulations and standards, prior to final  
            adoption or amendment, to undergo an external comprehensive  
            review process, as specified. 
          This bill:
          1.Permits DPH, if an LHO demonstrates or has demonstrated  
            through side-by-side testing over a beach season that the use  
            of US EPA methods, or any equivalent or improved rapid  
            detection method published by the US EPA for use in beach  
            water quality assessment, to determine the level of  
            enterococci bacteria as a single indicator provides a reliable  
            indication of overall microbiological contamination conditions  
            in all or part of his/her jurisdiction, to authorize the use  
            of that testing method in that jurisdiction instead of other  
            testing methods.
          2.Permits DPH, in making the determination of whether to  
            authorize using the testing methods by an LHO, as specified in  
            #1 above, to take into account whether the alternative  
            indicators and related test method can provide results more  
            quickly, thereby reducing the period of time the public is at  
            risk while waiting for contamination to be confirmed.
                                                                CONTINUED
                                                                    SB 1395
                                                                     Page  
          3
           Comments
           
           Beach pollution .  Ocean waters near beaches may become  
          contaminated by both point and non-point sources of pollution.   
          Point source pollution is defined by the United States  
          Environmental Protection Act as discrete conveyances, such as  
          pipes or manmade ditches that discharge pollutants directly into  
          waters of the United States.  This includes discharges from  
          municipal sewage plants and industrial facilities and storm  
          drainage from larger urban areas.  Non-point source pollution is  
          caused by rainfall or snowmelt moving over and through the  
          ground. As the runoff moves, it picks up and carries away  
          natural and manmade pollutants, depositing them into lakes,  
          rivers, wetlands, and coastal waters. 
          According to the EPA, polluted runoff and untreated sewage  
          released into recreational waters can expose swimmers to  
          bacteria, viruses, and protozoans. These pathogens can be  
          present at or near the site where polluted discharges enter the  
          water. When certain contaminants are present in sufficient  
          concentrations, they can pose a health hazard for swimming and  
          cause gastroenteritis, upper respiratory and ear infections,  
          sore throats, nausea and fevers, among other conditions.  
          Children, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems  
          are most likely to develop illnesses or infections after  
          swimming in polluted water.
          According to SWRCB, LHOs issue various types of warnings or  
          closures when indicator bacteria are found in the water at  
          levels that exceed standards set by DPH. These indicator  
          bacteria imply the potential presence of microscopic  
          disease-causing organisms originating from human and animal  
          wastes.  The SWRCB displays the postings and closure data  
          submitted from the LHO on its Internet Web site monthly.  SWRCB  
          also compiles the information into an annual report, which  
          provides additional data on sources of pollution, testing  
          methods, and causes of beach postings and closures.
           Prior Legislation
           
          SB 482 (Kehoe, Chapter 592, Statutes of 2011) transferred  
          primary jurisdiction of the Beach Water Quality Monitoring  
          Program to SWRCB.  
                                                                CONTINUED
                                                                   SB 1395
                                                                     Page  
          4
          AB 411 (Wayne, Chapter 765, Statutes of 1997) requires LHOs to  
          test waters adjacent to public beaches within their jurisdiction  
          and to take related action in the event of a known sewage  
          release.  AB 411 also requires LHOs to post conspicuous warning  
          signs and establish a telephone hotline to inform the public  
          about a beach that fails to meet standards developed by the  
          Department of Health Services (now DPH).
           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No
          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, no significant  
          costs to DPH.
           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/27/14)
          San Diego County (source) 
          California Coastkeeper Alliance
          San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce
          Surfrider Foundation
          WILDCOAST
           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    California Coastkeeper Alliance writes  
          that the current lag of the testing period can result in  
          swimmers, surfers and others using areas polluted by sewage and  
          runoff, causing illness such as stomach flu, skin rashes,  
          pinkeye, respiratory infections, meningitis, and hepatitis.  The  
          County of San Diego writes that the goal of this bill is to  
          provide flexibility in statute to allow for new, quick test  
          methodology based off single samples to be used to determine  
          water quality for California beaches.  The County of San Diego  
          further states that this bill does not mandate the use of the  
          qPRC method - it simply provides this test methodology as an  
          additional tool that can be used by a public health department  
          to more quickly provide information to the public related to  
          water quality. Surfrider Foundation states that this bill  
          complements the work they have been doing to prompt the  
          establishment of state and local government water quality  
          monitoring programs that improve the public's knowledge of the  
          safety of their beach water.  
          
          JL:nl  5/27/14   Senate Floor Analyses 
                                                                CONTINUED
                                                                    SB 1395
                                                                     Page  
          5
                           SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE
                                   ****  END  ****
                                                                CONTINUED