BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1400
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1400 (Hancock)
          As Amended  May 15, 2014
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :34-0  
           
           HIGHER EDUCATION    13-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Williams, Chávez, Bloom,  |     |                          |
          |     |Fong, Fox, Jones-Sawyer,  |     |                          |
          |     |Levine, Linder, Medina,   |     |                          |
          |     |Olsen, Quirk-Silva,       |     |                          |
          |     |Weber, Wilk               |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes a California Community College (CCC)  
          district to require a student whom the district has a protective  
          order against to apply for reinstatement.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :  

          1)Provides that if good cause for the issuance of a protective  
            order, requested by a CCC district to protect a campus or any  
            person on a campus, is issued by a court against a student of  
            the CCC district, the CCC district may require the student to  
            apply for reinstatement after the expiration of that order.

          2)Provides that if the CCC district requires a student to apply  
            for reinstatement, it must do so before the expiration of the  
            protective order.

          3)Provides that if a student applies for reinstatement, a review  
            of the reinstatement application shall be conducted and, at a  
            minimum, include consideration of all of the following:    

             a)   The gravity of the offense; 

             b)   Evidence of subsequent offenses, if any; and, 

             c)   The likelihood that the student would cause substantial  
               disruption if he or she is reinstated; 

          4)Requires the CCC governing board or designee to take one of  








                                                                  SB 1400
                                                                  Page  2


            the following actions after conducting a reinstatement review:

             a)   Deny reinstatement; 

             b)   Permit reinstatement; 

             c)   Permit conditional reinstatement, and specify the  
               conditions under which reinstatement will be permitted.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Provides that a CCC district governing board is authorized to  
            expel a student for good cause when other means of correction  
            fail to bring about proper conduct, or when the presence of  
            the student causes a continuing danger to the physical safety  
            of the student or others.  Provides that the expulsion shall  
            be accompanied by a hearing.

          2)Authorizes the governing board of a CCC district to require a  
            student seeking admission to disclose his or her prior  
            expulsion from another CCC and authorizes the governing board  
            to deny enrollment, permit enrollment, or permit conditional  
            enrollment to a student who has been expelled, or is being  
            considered for expulsion, from another CCC for specified  
            offenses within the preceding five years.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the  
          Legislative Counsel.   

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, under existing law, if a  
          district is successful in obtaining a protective order against a  
          student who is considered an imminent threat of bodily harm to a  
          district or persons that regularly are present on a district or  
          campus of the district, that student is barred from the campuses  
          of the district for the period of time of the protective order.  
          At the conclusion of the protective order, the student is free  
          to reregister for courses regardless of whether or not the  
          circumstances surrounding the restraining order have changed.   
          The author believes that allowing a student to re-enroll at the  
          expiration of the protective order without any sort of review of  
          the student's violation, rehabilitative efforts since the  
          offense and the student's ability to no longer cause a  
          continuing danger to the physical safety of the campus is  
          problematic and can place the safety of the campus community at  








                                                                  SB 1400
                                                                  Page  3


          great risk.

          This bill would permit a CCC district to require a student to  
          apply for reinstatement prior to the expiration of a protective  
          order, and allow the CCC district to conduct a review in order  
          to evaluate the severity of the offense for which the order was  
          issued, evidence of any later offenses, rehabilitative efforts  
          since the offense, and indication that the student would no  
          longer pose a serious threat to the college campus. 
           
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916)  
          319-3960 


                                                                FN: 0004110