SB 1404, as amended, Leno. San Francisco redevelopment: successor agencies: housing.
The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined. Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies that are required to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations. Existing law provides that the city, county, or city and county that authorized the creation of a redevelopment agency may elect to retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the redevelopment agency. Existing law requires the entity assuming the housing functions of the former redevelopment agency to perform various functions.
Existing law authorized the former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco, subject to the approval of the board of supervisors of that city and county, to incur indebtedness exclusively for specified Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund activities until January 1, 2014, or until the agency replaced all of the housing units demolished prior to the enactment of the replacement housing obligations, and to receive tax increment revenues to repay indebtedness incurred for those activities until no later than January 1, 2044, as specified.
This bill would state findings and declarations relating to the obligation of the successor agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco to replace specified affordable housing units, and the necessity of a special statute.
This bill would instead authorize the successor agency of the City and County of San Francisco, subject to the approval of the oversight board of the City and County of San Francisco, to continue to receive property tax increment from specified redevelopment project areas, and to incur indebtedness pursuant to specified amended redevelopment plans, to fulfill the obligation to replace specified affordable housing units.
begin insertThis bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by SB 1129 that would become operative if this bill and SB 1129 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.
end insertVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the 
2following:
3(a) Under the authority granted by the Legislature in Senate Bill 
4No. 2113 (Chapter 661 of the Statutes of 2000), the former 
5Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco 
6sought, prior to its dissolution, to redress the demolition of a 
7substantial number of residential dwelling units affordable to very 
8low, low-, and moderate-income households during the agency’s
9
				earlier urban renewal efforts. In 2003, the California Department 
10of Housing and Community Development determined that the 
11former Redevelopment Agency must replace a net loss of 6,709 
12affordable units.
13(b) Prior to its dissolution, the Redevelopment Agency of the 
14City and County of San Francisco sought and received state and 
P3    1local authorization to assume the replacement housing obligations 
2acknowledged in Senate Bill No. 2113 (Chapter 661 of the Statutes 
3of 2000). Between 2005 and 2009, the Board of Supervisors of 
4the City and County of San Francisco amended six redevelopment 
5plans to extend the time for the receipt and expenditure of tax 
6increment for the sole purpose of funding the replacement housing 
7obligations. San Francisco Ordinance No. 256-09 (December 18, 
82009), amending Yerba Buena Center Redevelopment Plan, San 
9Francisco
				Ordinance No. 316-08 (December 19, 2008), amending 
10Western Addition A-2 Redevelopment Plan, San Francisco 
11Ordinance No. 115-07 (May 18, 2007), amending Rincon 
12Point-South Beach Redevelopment Plan, and San Francisco 
13Ordinance No. 15-05 (January 21, 2005), amending the 
14Embarcadero-Lower Market (Golden Gateway) Redevelopment 
15Plan, the Hunters Point Redevelopment Plan, and the India Basin 
16Redevelopment Plan. Under these redevelopment plan 
17amendments, the Redevelopment Agency was able to finance the 
18construction of 867 affordable units.
19(c) It is the intent of the Legislature to confirm that the 
20replacement of the remaining 5842 units that the former 
21Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco 
22destroyed and did not replace is a statutory obligation that remains 
23under Assembly Bill No. 26 (Chapter 5 of the First Extraordinary 
24Session
				of the Statutes of 2011), as amended by Assembly Bill 
25No. 1484 (Chapter 26 of the Statutes of 2012). Furthermore, the 
26Legislature finds that the ability of the Successor Agency to the 
27Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco 
28to fulfill this replacement housing obligation is dependent on its 
29ability to incur indebtedness for the purpose of financing the 
30remaining unbuilt units.
31(d) Authorizing the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment 
32Agency of the City and County of San Francisco to continue to 
33receive property tax revenues under the formulas of Senate Bill 
34No. 2113, which ensure that school entities receive their full share 
35of property tax revenues as if the redevelopment plans had expired, 
36will not have a fiscal impact on the state.
37(e) San Francisco’s
				housing situation is unique, in that median 
38rents and sales prices are among the highest in the state even though 
39it exceeded the housing production goals of the Community 
40Redevelopment Law and used local funds beyond redevelopment 
P4    1funding to assist affordable housing development. Nonetheless, 
2San Francisco’s early redevelopment activities, including the 
3removal of previously existing dwelling units serving a lower 
4income population, have compounded the effects of the private 
5market that have led to the city’s current affordable housing crisis. 
6Because of the unique circumstances relating to the replacement 
7of affordable housing demolished by the former Redevelopment 
8Agency of the City and County of San Francisco, a special law is 
9necessary and a general law cannot be made applicable within the 
10meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution.
11(f) After dissolution of the redevelopment agency, the oversight 
12board for the City and County of San Francisco acknowledged the 
13unfulfilled replacement housing obligations of the redevelopment 
14agency and approved the successor agency’s expenditures of funds 
15to fulfill those obligations (see Oversight Board Resolution 
16No. 5-2012 at pp. 5-6 (April 10, 2012)). Subsequently, the 
17oversight board approved expenditures for the replacement housing 
18obligations on each of the recognized obligation payment schedules 
19required under Redevelopment Dissolution Law and submitted to 
20the Department of Finance. 
Section 33333.7 of the Health and Safety Code is 
22amended to read:
(a) The successor agency to the Redevelopment 
24Agency of the City and County of San Francisco may, subject to 
25the approval of the oversight board of the City and County of San 
26Francisco, replace all of the housing units demolished prior to the 
27enactment of the replacement housing obligations in Chapter 970 
28of the Statutes of 1975 and further described in Section 33333.7 
29of the Health and Safety Code, as added by Chapter 661 of the 
30Statutes of 2000. The successor agency shall not use more than 
31six redevelopment project areas under redevelopment plans that 
32were amended for this purpose prior to enactment of the law 
33dissolving redevelopment agencies, and that may be merged, 
34subject to approval by the
						oversight board pursuant to subdivision 
35(d) of Section 34180, to fulfill these replacement housing 
36obligations.
37(b) In addition to the powers granted to each successor agency, 
38and notwithstanding anything in Part 1.8 (commencing with 
39Section 34161) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170), 
40including, but not limited to, Sections 34162 and 34189, the 
P5    1successor agency to the former redevelopment agency of the City 
2and County of San Francisco shall have the authority, rights, and 
3powers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of 
4San
						Francisco to incur indebtedness, backed by property tax 
5revenues from the six project areas referenced in subdivision (a) 
6exclusively for the purpose of fulfilling the replacement housing 
7obligations. The standards for issuance of bonds specified in 
8subdivisions (c) to (h), inclusive, of Section 34177.5, as that section 
9read on December 31, 2014, shall apply to the sale of those bonds 
10and shall include review and approval by the oversight board and 
11the Department of Finance under subdivision (b) of Section 34180 
12and subdivision (h) of Section 34179, respectively. The successor 
13agency, in seeking approval for issuance of bonds by the oversight 
14board and the Department of Finance, shall report on the number 
15of replacement units that it has funded and completed since 
16enactment of Chapter 661 of the Statutes of 2000. Bonds issued 
17pursuant to this subdivision may be sold pursuant to
						either a 
18negotiated or competitive sale. Any time limit on incurring debt 
19or receiving property tax revenues to repay that debt, pursuant to 
20this subdivision, shall not apply until the successor agency replaces 
21all of the units demolished prior to the enactment of the 
22replacement housing obligations in Chapter 970 of the Statutes of 
231975. The successor agency may issue new bonds or other 
24obligations on a parity basis with outstanding bonds or other 
25obligations of the successor agency relating to the six project areas 
26referenced in subdivision (a) and may pledge the revenues pledged 
27to those outstanding bonds or other obligations to a new issuance 
28of bonds or other obligation, and that pledge, when made in 
29connection with the issuance of those bonds or other obligations 
30shall have the same lien priority as the pledge of outstanding bonds 
31or other obligations, and shall be valid, binding, and enforceable 
32in
						accordance with its terms.
33(c) Annual revenues authorized under this section shall not 
34exceed the amount necessary to fund the activities of the successor 
35agency in fulfilling these replacement housing obligations. The 
36agency shall neither collect nor spend more than 10 percent for 
37the planning and administrative costs authorized pursuant to 
38subdivision (e) of Section 33334.3. Property tax revenues allocated 
39to the successor agency pursuant to this section shall be distributed 
40from the funds that arebegin insert otherwiseend insert available for distribution to
P6    1begin delete nonschool entitiesend deletebegin insert the City and County of San Francisco, as
						a 
2taxing entity,end insert from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, 
3created pursuant to Section 34170.5, after all preexisting legal 
4commitments and statutory obligations funded from that revenue, 
5excluding replacement housing obligations described in this 
6section, are made pursuant to Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 
734170) of Division 24. Property tax revenues allocated to the 
8successor agency pursuant to this section shall not include any 
9moneys that, notwithstanding the replacement housing obligations 
10described in this section, are payable tobegin insert local agencies other than 
11the City and County of San Francisco,end insert a school district that 
12maintains kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, community 
13college districts, or to the Educational Revenue Augmentation 
14Fund, pursuant to paragraph (4) of
						subdivision (a) of Section 
1534183.
16(d) The activities conducted with revenues received under this
17
						section shall be consistent with the affordable housing requirements 
18of this part and the policies and objectives of the community’s 
19housing element, and shall address the unmet housing needs of 
20very low, low- and moderate-income households. The activities 
21shall also be consistent with the community’s most recently 
22approved consolidated and annual action plans submitted to the 
23United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 
24No less than 50 percent of the revenues received shall be devoted 
25to assisting in the development of housing that is affordable to 
26very low income households.
Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code is 
28amended to read:
All of the following successor agency actions shall first 
30be approved by the oversight board:
31(a) The establishment of new repayment terms for outstanding 
32loans where the terms have not been specified prior to the date of 
33this part. An oversight board shall not have the authority to 
34reestablish loan agreements between the successor agency and the 
35city, county, or city and county that formed the redevelopment 
36agency except as provided in Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 
3734191.1).
38(b) The issuance of bonds or other indebtedness or the pledge 
39or agreement for the pledge of property tax revenues (formerly tax 
P7    1increment prior to the effective
						date of this part) pursuant to Section 
233333.7 and subdivision (a) of Section 34177.5.
3(c) Setting aside of amounts in reserves as required by 
4indentures, trust indentures, or similar documents governing the 
5issuance of outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
6(d) Merging of project areas.
7(e) Continuing the acceptance of federal or state grants, or other 
8forms of financial assistance from either public or private sources, 
9if that assistance is conditioned upon the provision of matching 
10funds, by the successor entity as successor to the former 
11redevelopment agency, in an amount greater than 5 percent.
12(f) (1) If a city, county, or city and county wishes to retain any
13
						properties or other assets for future redevelopment activities, 
14funded from its own funds and under its own auspices, it must 
15reach a compensation agreement with the other taxing entities to 
16provide payments to them in proportion to their shares of the base 
17property tax, as determined pursuant to Section 34188, for the 
18value of the property retained.
19(2) If no other agreement is reached on valuation of the retained 
20assets, the value will be the fair market value as of the 2011 
21property tax lien date as determined by an independent appraiser 
22approved by the oversight board.
23(g) Establishment of the Recognized Obligation Payment 
24Schedule.
25(h) A request by the successor agency to enter into an agreement 
26with the
						city, county, or city and county that formed the 
27redevelopment agency that it is succeeding. An oversight board 
28shall not have the authority to reestablish loan agreements between 
29the successor agency and the city, county, or city and county that 
30formed the redevelopment agency except as provided in Chapter 
319 (commencing with Section 34191.1). Any actions to reestablish 
32any other agreements that are in furtherance of enforceable 
33obligations, with the city, county, or city and county that formed 
34the redevelopment agency are invalid until they are included in an 
35approved and valid Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
36(i) A request by a successor agency or taxing entity to pledge, 
37or to enter into an agreement for the pledge of, property tax 
38revenues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34178.
39(j) Any document submitted by a successor agency to an 
40oversight board for approval by any provision of this part shall 
P8    1also be submitted to the county administrative officer, the county 
2auditor-controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time 
3that the successor agency submits the document to the oversight 
4board.
begin insertSection 34180 of the end insertbegin insertHealth and Safety Codeend insertbegin insert is 
6amended to read:end insert
All of the following successor agency actions shall first 
8be approved by the oversight board:
9(a) The establishment of new repayment terms for outstanding 
10loans where the terms have not been specified prior to the date of 
11this part. An oversight board shall not have the authority to 
12reestablish loan agreements between the successor agency and the 
13city, county, or city and county that formed the redevelopment 
14agency except as provided in Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 
1534191.1).
16(b) The issuance of bonds or other indebtedness or the pledge 
17or agreement for the pledge of property tax revenues (formerly tax 
18increment prior to the effective date of this part) pursuant tobegin insert
						Section 
1933333.7 andend insert subdivision (a) of Section 34177.5.
20(c) Setting aside of amounts in reserves as required by 
21indentures, trust indentures, or similar documents governing the 
22issuance of outstanding redevelopment agency bonds.
23(d) Merging of project areas.
24(e) Continuing the acceptance of federal or state grants, or other 
25forms of financial assistance from either public or private sources, 
26if that assistance is conditioned upon the provision of matching 
27funds, by the successor entity as successor to the former 
28redevelopment agency, in an amount greater than 5 percent.
29(f) (1) If a city, county, or city and county wishes to retain any 
30properties or other assets for future redevelopment
						activities, 
31funded from its own funds and under its own auspices, it must 
32reach a compensation agreement with the other taxing entities to 
33provide payments to them in proportion to their shares of the base 
34property tax, as determined pursuant to Section 34188, for the 
35value of the property retained.
36(2) If no other agreement is reached on valuation of the retained 
37assets, the value will be the fair market value as of the 2011 
38property tax lien date as determined by an independent appraiser 
39approved by the oversight board.
P9    1(3) This subdivision does not apply to the disposition of 
2properties pursuant to a long-range property management plan.
3(g) Establishment of the Recognized Obligation Payment 
4Schedule.
5(h) A request by the successor agency to enter into an agreement 
6with the city, county, or city and county that formed the 
7redevelopment agency that it is succeeding. An oversight board 
8shall not have the authority to reestablish loan agreements between 
9the successor agency and the city, county, or city and county that 
10formed the redevelopment agency except as provided in Chapter 
119 (commencing with Section 34191.1). Any actions to reestablish 
12any other agreements that are in furtherance of enforceable 
13obligations, with the city, county, or city and county that formed 
14the redevelopment agency are invalid until they are included in an 
15approved and valid Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule.
16(i) A request by a successor agency or taxing entity to pledge, 
17or to enter into an agreement for the pledge of, property tax 
18revenues pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34178.
19(j) Any document submitted by a successor agency to an 
20oversight board for approval by any provision of this part shall 
21also be submitted to the county administrative officer, the county 
22auditor-controller, and the Department of Finance at the same time 
23that the successor agency submits the document to the oversight 
24board.
Section 3.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to 
26Section 34180 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by both 
27this bill and Senate Bill 1129. It shall only become operative if (1) 
28both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 
291, 2015, (2) each bill amends Section 34180 of the Health and 
30Safety Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 1129, in 
31which case Section 3 of this bill shall not become operative.
O
95