BILL ANALYSIS Ó
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Kevin de León, Chair
SB 1421 (Fuller) - School Facilities: Schoolsites on Military
Bases
Amended: April 21, 2014 Policy Vote: Education 6-0
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: May 23, 2014 Consultant: Jacqueline
Wong-Hernandez
SUSPENSE FILE. AS AMENDED.
Bill Summary: SB 1421 requires that school construction projects
on military installations that are eligible for specified
federal grants be given priority for funding under the state's
School Facility Program (SFP).
Fiscal Impact (as approved on May 23, 2014):
Regulations: Likely minor costs to the Office of Public
School Construction (OPSC) to develop regulations to
determine how to prioritize military base schools.
Priority funding: Prioritizing SFP bond funding for certain
military base school projects, could result in schools being
given priority for $5 million in bond funding for which they
would not otherwise be eligible, and which would otherwise
fund other schools' facilities projects.
Background: Existing law establishes the SFP under which the
state provides general obligation bond funding for various
school construction projects. AB 127 (Nunez and Perata), the
Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of
2006, authorized Proposition 1D a statewide general obligation
bond proposal for $10.4 billion. Proposition 1D, approved by
the voters in November 2006, provided $7.3 billion for K-12
education facilities and allocated specified amounts from the
sale of these bonds for modernization, new construction, charter
schools, career technical education facilities, joint use
projects, new construction on severely overcrowded school sites,
and high performance incentive grants to promote energy
efficient design and materials. In addition, portions of the
SB 1421 (Fuller)
Page 1
amounts allocated for new construction and modernization were
authorized for purposes of funding smaller learning communities
and small high schools and for seismic retrofit projects.
(Education Code § 17078.70-17078.72)
Proposed Law: This bill establishes priority for funding under
the SFP for construction projects that are on military
installations, and are eligible for United States Department of
Defense Office of Economic Adjustment school construction
grants.
Staff Comments: According to the OPSC, approximately $351
million remains in bond authority in the SFP. At its March 2014
meeting, the SAB took action to reserve $52.7 million of
existing bond authority for the ongoing administration of the
program over the next five years, reducing the remaining bond
authority to $298.4 million. The majority of this bond authority
exists for the Seismic Mitigation and Charter School programs
(about $259 million). Bond authority for new construction and
modernizations programs has essentially been depleted,
respectively, since July 2012 and May 2012.
Since 2009, the State Allocation Board (SAB) has been making
"unfunded approvals" which represented approved projects waiting
to convert to funding apportionments when bonds are sold and
cash becomes available. In addition, since November 1, 2012, the
SAB has maintained an "Applications Received Beyond Bond
Authority" list.
This bill seeks to prioritize projects that are on military
installations, and are eligible for United States Department of
Defense Office of Economic Adjustment school construction
grants. The purpose is to assist these schools in drawing down
approximately $205 million in federal grant funding, by using
SFP funds for their required 20% match ($41 million).
The SFP considers projects for funding in the order those
requests were received. The SAB recently adopted a new
"priorities in funding" process which gives priority for funding
to construction-ready projects, allowing these projects to
essentially move to the front of the line. Projects on the "lack
of authority" and "beyond authority" lists advance as bond funds
become available. Under this bill, school construction projects
SB 1421 (Fuller)
Page 2
on military bases would (to a degree determined by the SAB/OPSC)
be prioritized over other projects currently awaiting funding,
and those projects would move further down the list.
Committee amendments further limit priority eligibility to
schools which have already applied for SFP funding for their
projects, and which agree to refrain from applying for SFP
funding for 3 subsequent years.