BILL ANALYSIS Ó
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Kevin de León, Chair
SB 1456 (Nielsen) - Firearms: assault weapons and .50 BMG
rifles.
Amended: May 6, 2014 Policy Vote: Public Safety 6-0
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: May 19, 2014 Consultant: Jolie Onodera
This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
Bill Summary: SB 1456 would expand the list of peace officers
authorized to possess certain assault weapons to include
officers employed by the Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection (CalFIRE), as specified.
Fiscal Impact: Potential costs in excess of $200,000 (Special
Fund*/General Fund) to CalFIRE to purchase weapons, safety
equipment, recertification and training for officers.
*State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund
Background: Existing law generally makes it a crime to possess,
manufacture, distribute, transport, import or keep for sale,
offer or expose for sale, or give or lend any assault weapon or
.50 BMG rifle. Under existing law, these prohibitions do not
apply to the sale to, purchase by, importation by, or possession
by, the Department of Justice, the Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, the Department of Fish and Game, the Department
of Parks and Recreation, the California Highway Patrol, the
United States military or naval forces, or to any district
attorney's office, police department, or sheriff's office.
(Penal Code (PC) § 30625)
Current law authorizes peace officers employed by the agencies
listed in PC § 30625 to possess or use assault weapons for law
enforcement purposes, whether on or off duty, and to purchase
assault weapons with their own money subject to written
authorization from the employer. (PC §§ 30630(a)-(b))
Proposed Law: This bill would add the Department of Forestry and
Fire Protection to the list of exempted agencies under PC §
30625, thereby authorizing CalFIRE peace officers to possess and
SB 1456 (Nielsen)
PageA
purchase assault weapons.
Staff Comments: CalFIRE currently employs 175 peace officers, of
which 94 officers are authorized to carry firearms. Based on an
estimated cost per officer of $2,125 to replace the existing
firearm, obtain recertification and training, and purchase
appropriate safety equipment for the new weapon, total one-time
costs for the 94 officers currently authorized to carry firearms
would be about $200,000. To the extent additional officers are
subsequently provided this authorization, costs could increase
to $375,000 for all officers. Costs would also vary dependent on
the type of weapon ultimately purchased.
While CalFIRE has indicated costs are projected to be paid from
the State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund, it is
unclear whether this would be an appropriate use of the Fund.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 4214(a)(2), the moneys
collected and available to CalFIRE are to be expended for fire
prevention activities<1> that benefit the owners of structures
within a state responsibility area who are required to pay the
fire prevention fee. All moneys in excess of the costs of
administration of the department are to be expended only for
fire prevention activities in counties with state responsibility
areas.
---------------------------
<1> PRC § 4214(d) provides that moneys in the fund shall be used
only for the following fire prevention activities:
(1) Local assistance grants, as specified.
(2) Grants to Fire Safe Councils, the California Conservation
Corps, or certified local conservation corps for fire prevention
projects and activities in the state responsibility areas.
(3) Grants to a qualified nonprofit organization with a
demonstrated ability to satisfactorily plan, implement, and
complete a fire prevention project applicable to the state
responsibility areas. (4) Inspections by the department for
compliance with defensible space requirements around structures
in state responsibility areas, as specified.
(5) Public education to reduce fire risk in the state
responsibility areas.
(6) Fire severity and fire hazard mapping by the department in
the state responsibility areas.
(7) Other fire prevention projects in the state responsibility
areas, authorized by the board.
SB 1456 (Nielsen)
PageB
To the extent the payment of these costs from the State
Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund are deemed
inappropriate, costs would likely be paid from the General Fund.