BILL ANALYSIS Ó Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary Senator Kevin de León, Chair SB 1456 (Nielsen) - Firearms: assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles. Amended: May 6, 2014 Policy Vote: Public Safety 6-0 Urgency: No Mandate: No Hearing Date: May 19, 2014 Consultant: Jolie Onodera This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: SB 1456 would expand the list of peace officers authorized to possess certain assault weapons to include officers employed by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFIRE), as specified. Fiscal Impact: Potential costs in excess of $200,000 (Special Fund*/General Fund) to CalFIRE to purchase weapons, safety equipment, recertification and training for officers. *State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund Background: Existing law generally makes it a crime to possess, manufacture, distribute, transport, import or keep for sale, offer or expose for sale, or give or lend any assault weapon or .50 BMG rifle. Under existing law, these prohibitions do not apply to the sale to, purchase by, importation by, or possession by, the Department of Justice, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Department of Fish and Game, the Department of Parks and Recreation, the California Highway Patrol, the United States military or naval forces, or to any district attorney's office, police department, or sheriff's office. (Penal Code (PC) § 30625) Current law authorizes peace officers employed by the agencies listed in PC § 30625 to possess or use assault weapons for law enforcement purposes, whether on or off duty, and to purchase assault weapons with their own money subject to written authorization from the employer. (PC §§ 30630(a)-(b)) Proposed Law: This bill would add the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to the list of exempted agencies under PC § 30625, thereby authorizing CalFIRE peace officers to possess and SB 1456 (Nielsen) PageA purchase assault weapons. Staff Comments: CalFIRE currently employs 175 peace officers, of which 94 officers are authorized to carry firearms. Based on an estimated cost per officer of $2,125 to replace the existing firearm, obtain recertification and training, and purchase appropriate safety equipment for the new weapon, total one-time costs for the 94 officers currently authorized to carry firearms would be about $200,000. To the extent additional officers are subsequently provided this authorization, costs could increase to $375,000 for all officers. Costs would also vary dependent on the type of weapon ultimately purchased. While CalFIRE has indicated costs are projected to be paid from the State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund, it is unclear whether this would be an appropriate use of the Fund. Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 4214(a)(2), the moneys collected and available to CalFIRE are to be expended for fire prevention activities<1> that benefit the owners of structures within a state responsibility area who are required to pay the fire prevention fee. All moneys in excess of the costs of administration of the department are to be expended only for fire prevention activities in counties with state responsibility areas. --------------------------- <1> PRC § 4214(d) provides that moneys in the fund shall be used only for the following fire prevention activities: (1) Local assistance grants, as specified. (2) Grants to Fire Safe Councils, the California Conservation Corps, or certified local conservation corps for fire prevention projects and activities in the state responsibility areas. (3) Grants to a qualified nonprofit organization with a demonstrated ability to satisfactorily plan, implement, and complete a fire prevention project applicable to the state responsibility areas. (4) Inspections by the department for compliance with defensible space requirements around structures in state responsibility areas, as specified. (5) Public education to reduce fire risk in the state responsibility areas. (6) Fire severity and fire hazard mapping by the department in the state responsibility areas. (7) Other fire prevention projects in the state responsibility areas, authorized by the board. SB 1456 (Nielsen) PageB To the extent the payment of these costs from the State Responsibility Area Fire Prevention Fund are deemed inappropriate, costs would likely be paid from the General Fund.