BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 33 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 6, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair AB 33 (Quirk) - As Amended April 6, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Natural Resources |Vote:|9 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill establishes the Climate Change Advisory Council (Council) to make recommendations to the Air Resources Board (ARB) regarding various greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction strategies, including grid integration, building efficiency, and AB 33 Page 2 advanced transportation. Specifically, this bill: 1)Establishes the Council, consisting of the following appointees or their designees: a) Chair of ARB. b) President of Public Utilities Commission (PUC). c) Chair of California Independent System Operator (CAISO) governing board. d) Chair of State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). e) Chair of California Energy Commission (CEC). 2)Requires the Council to complete recommendations for inclusion in the AB 32 Scoping Plan consisting of: a) Analyses of various strategies to achieve the statewide GHG limit, as specified. b) Economic assessment of the various GHG strategies using the best available models and data. c) Analysis of other benefits of the various strategies. AB 33 Page 3 3)Provides that the Council's analysis is intended to assist in establishing state policy and does not change any statute, regulation, or regulatory decision. 4)Requires ARB to establish consistent metrics for GHG emission reductions, public health benefits, and cost-effectiveness of the various strategies identified by the Council. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Ongoing annual cost increases of approximately $700,000 (Cost of Implementation Fund) for the ARB to: 1) design metrics to quantify GHG reductions; 2) quantify public health benefits; and 3) measure the cost effectiveness of GHG reductions strategies. 2)Increased combined annual costs (various special funds) for PUC, CAISO, SWRCB and CEC of up to $800,000 to perform the duties required by the bill. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, the implementation of (AB 32's) ambitious energy and environmental goals are the responsibility of a group of fragmented state agencies that lack a comprehensive plan to effectively move forward and synchronize our policies to ensure maximum efficiency. This AB 33 Page 4 bill will increase the coordination among ARB, CPUC, CEC, SWRCB, and CAISO by establishing the Climate Change Advisory Council and directing the Council to analyze various GHG emissions reduction strategies in the areas of (1) energy generation; (2) transportation; and (3) energy efficiency. 2)Background. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) requires ARB to adopt: a) statewide GHG emissions limit equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020; and b) regulations, including market-based compliance mechanisms, to achieve maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reductions. AB 32 requires ARB to prepare and approve a scoping plan at five-year intervals. The first AB 32 scoping plan, adopted by ARB in 2008, described the specific measures ARB and others must take to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. According to ARB, a total reduction of 80 million metric tons (MMT), or 16% compared to business as usual, is necessary to achieve the 2020 limit. Approximately 78% of the reductions will be achieved through identified direct regulations. ARB proposes to achieve the balance of reductions necessary to meet the 2020 limit (approximately 18 MMT) through a cap-and-trade program that covers an estimated 600 entities. In May 2014, ARB adopted a scoping plan update. The scoping plan update discusses the objective of achieving an 80% reduction by 2050 and the need for a midterm target, but does not propose or adopt a specific target. According to ARB, the update defines ARB's climate change priorities for the next five years and sets the groundwork to reach California's long-term climate goals. 3)Governor's Executive Order B-30-15. On April 29, 2015, the Governor issued an executive order to establish a new interim AB 33 Page 5 statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 in order to ensure California meets its target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. 4)2019 Scoping Plan Update. The next scoping plan update will be in 2019. According to the author, the 2014 update to ARB's Scoping Plan, did not provide a robust economic assessment of the strategies implemented to reduce emissions. This bill is intended to address this shortcoming by requiring the Council to conduct an economic assessment of the various GHG emissions reduction strategies using the best available economic models and data. As many decisions are currently being considered regarding reducing GHG emissions beyond 2020, the author may wish to consider requiring the metrics and analyses provided in the bill at an earlier date. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081