AB 50, 
            					 as amended, Mullin. begin deleteNurse-Family Partnership.  end deletebegin insertMedi-Cal: evidenceend insertbegin insert-based home visiting programs.end insert
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including perinatal services for pregnant women.
Existing law establishes the Nurse-Family Partnership program, which is administered by the State Department of Public Health, to provide grants for voluntary nurse home visiting programs for expectant first-time mothers, their children, and their families. Under existing law, a county is required to satisfy specified requirements in order to be eligible to receive a grant.
This bill would require the State Department ofbegin delete Public Health to additionally develop a grant application and award grants to counties for other evidence-based home visiting programs, and
			 would require the department,end deletebegin insert Health Care Services,end insert in consultation withbegin delete stakeholders and the State Department of Health Care Services,end deletebegin insert stakeholders,end insert to develop and implement a plan on or before January 1, 2017, to ensure thatbegin delete Nurse-Family Partnership and otherend delete evidence-basedbegin delete nurseend delete home visiting programs are offered and provided to Medi-Cal eligible pregnantbegin delete women.end deletebegin insert and parenting
			 women, end insertbegin insertand would require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, to report to the Legislature, as specified. The bill would also require the department, in developing the plan, to consider, among other things, establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based end insertbegin inserthome visiting program services and incentives for providers to offer those services.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the 
2following:
3(a) According to United States Census Bureau, California has 
4a poverty rate of 23.5 percent, the highest rate of any state in the 
5country.
6(b) Children born into poverty are at higher risk of health and 
7developmental disparities, including, but not limited to, premature 
8birth, low birth weight, infant mortality, crime, domestic violence, 
9developmental delays, dropping out of high school, substance 
10abuse, unemployment, and child abuse and neglect.
11(c) In 2014, the
				Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent 
12Resolution No. 155 by Assembly Member Raul Bocanegra, 
13recognizing that research over the last two decades in the evolving 
14fields of neuroscience, molecular biology, public health, genomics, 
15and epigenetics reveals that experiences in the first few years of 
16life build changes into the biology of the human body that, in turn, 
17influence the person’s physical and mental health over his or her 
18lifetime.
19(d) On May 3, 2012, Governor Edmund G, Brown Jr. issued 
20Executive Order B-19-12, establishing the “Let’s Get Healthy 
21California Task Force” to develop a 10-year plan for improving 
22the health of Californians, controlling health care costs, promoting 
23personal responsibility for individual health, and advancing health 
24equity.”
P3    1(e) The task
				force identified several priorities, including a subset 
2for “Healthy Beginnings,” which include reducing infant deaths, 
3increasing vaccination rates, reducing childhood trauma, and 
4reducing adolescent tobacco use.
5(f) The final report of the task force states “the challenge going 
6forward is to identify evidence-based interventions and quicken 
7the pace of uptake across the state,” in order to meet the ambitious 
8goals in the Governor’s directive.
9(g) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting programs, such as 
10Nurse-Family Partnership, Healthy Families America, Early Head 
11Start (Home-Based Program Option), Parents as Teachers, and 
12Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, strengthen 
13the critical parent-child relationship and connect families with 
14information and resources
				during the pivotal time from pregnancy 
15to five years of age. Extensive research has shown that 
16evidence-based home visiting programs serving pregnant and 
17parenting mothers, prenatal to the child turning five years of age, 
18increase family self-sufficiency, positive parenting practices, child 
19literacy and school readiness, and maternal and child health.
20(h) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting program models 
21the prenatal to five years of age range from low to high intensity, 
22reflecting the broad spectrum of family needs that home visiting 
23can impact. Many experts hail home visiting program diversity as 
24essential to providing parents with choices and ensuring that 
25programs are well matched with local needs and strengths, as well 
26as responsive to the diverse needs of California’s children and 
27families.
28(g)
end delete
29begin insert(i)end insert In 2013, more than 248,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries gave 
30birth to a child. Because Medi-Cal covers half of all births in the 
31state, this has increased costs for taxpayers. Medi-Cal expansion 
32has resulted in an 18 percent increase in Medi-Cal enrollment to 
33a total of 11.3 million, and enrollment is expected to exceed 12 
34million in 2015.
35(h)
end delete
36begin insert(j)end insert The California Health and Human Services Agency recently 
37submitted its State Health Care Innovation Plan,
				including the 
38Maternity Care initiative, which addresses issues of high costs in 
39maternity care, to the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid 
40Innovation. Child deliveries and related expenses, including 
P4    1high-risk births, rank among the top 10begin delete high costend deletebegin insert high-costend insert episodes 
2of health care, and in the last 15 years, California has seen a 
3continual rise in maternal mortality.
4(i)
end delete
5begin insert(k)end insert The cost of health care specifically related
				to high-risk 
6pregnancies, neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU) services, toxic 
7stress, and emergency room visits has increased and is projected 
8to continue to rise. Average health care costs for women were 25 
9percent more than men primarily due to higher costs of health care 
10during childbearing years.
11(j) The Nurse-Family Partnership is a voluntary, evidence-based, 
12prevention program that partners low-income, pregnant women 
13having their first child with a registered nurse who provides home 
14visits from early in pregnancy until the child’s second birthday.
15(k) With more than 37 years of evidence from randomized, 
16controlled trials, the Nurse-Family Partnership has demonstrated 
17sustained improvements in maternal health, child health and 
18development, and the economic stability of families.
19(l) The Nurse-Family Partnership has consistently demonstrated 
20reductions in preterm births and preventable maternal mortality 
21via controlled trial and longitudinal follow-ups over two decades.
22(m) Randomized, controlled trials have also demonstrated that 
23the use of Nurse-Family Partnership nurse home visitors increases 
24positive outcomes during the prenatal period and the first two years 
25of life compared to the use of paraprofessionals.
26(n) Research has shown that the Nurse-Family Partnership can 
27reduce smoking during pregnancy, complications of pregnancy, 
28preterm births, closely spaced subsequent births, and childhood 
29injuries resulting in costly emergency department use and 
30hospitalizations. The Nurse-Family Partnership also can improve 
31childhood immunization rates and compliance with well child visit 
32schedules. As a result of families benefiting from Nurse-Family 
33Partnership, there has been cost savings to federal, state, and local 
34governments with respect to programs and services, including 
35Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), 
36and the
		  Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 
37program.
38(o) By enrolling recipients no later than 28 weeks of gestation, 
39the Nurse-Family Partnership maximizes the impact on prenatal 
P5    1care, birth outcomes, and critical early brain development of 
2infants.
3(p) The Nurse-Family Partnership’s evidence base and benefits 
4to society are well documented and validated by independent 
5analyses.
6(l) With more than three decades of evidence from randomized, 
7controlled trials and rigorous followup evaluation studies, 
8evidence-based home
				visiting programs have demonstrated 
9sustained improvements in maternal health, child health, positive 
10parenting practices, child development and school readiness, 
11reductions in child maltreatment, family economic self-sufficiency, 
12linkages and referrals, and reductions in family violence.
13(m) Evidence-based home visiting programs have specifically 
14demonstrated reductions in preterm births, preventable maternal 
15mortality, smoking during pregnancy, complications of pregnancy, 
16closely spaced subsequent births, childhood injuries resulting in 
17costly emergency department use and hospitalizations, improved 
18childhood immunization rates, compliance with well child visit 
19schedules, lower body mass index rates, higher birth weights, and 
20improved family well-being, including increased family health 
21literacy, and parent self-help development. As a result of families 
22benefiting from evidence-based home visiting, there has been cost 
23savings to federal, state, and local governments with respect
				to 
24programs and services, including Medicaid, the Supplemental 
25Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and the Temporary 
26Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.
27(q)
end delete
28begin insert(n)end insert Thebegin delete Nurse-Family Partnership’send delete strong evidence of 
29effectiveness and predictable return on investment demonstrate 
30thatbegin delete thisend delete
				evidence-basedbegin delete interventionend deletebegin insert home visiting programsend insert
31 should be brought to scale in California to improve maternal and 
32child health outcomes and help reduce health care costs for 
33generations to come.
34(r) Twenty-one California counties currently operate a 
35Nurse-Family
		  Partnership program providing services to 4,000 
36residents. Only a fraction of the 100,000 potentially eligible 
37recipients annually are receiving these highly beneficial and 
38cost-effective services.
39(s) However, if California were to provide these services to 
40significantly more eligible first-time mothers, the state could see 
P6    1population-wide health and economic benefits that would carry 
2over to future generations.
3(o) By supporting families from the start, voluntary 
4evidence-based home visiting programs serving families from 
5prenatal to five years of age provide a foundation for subsequent 
6early childhood programs and family support efforts to build upon, 
7and
				can help ensure that families are well-equipped to raise 
8California’s next generation of productive, healthy, and successful 
9adults.
10(t)
end delete
11begin insert(p)end insert Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to develop a 
12means to leverage public and private dollars to substantially expand 
13the scale ofbegin delete the Nurse-Family Partnership and otherend delete evidence-based
14begin delete nurseend delete home visitingbegin insert programsend insert
				throughout California, beginning 
15with communities and populations with the greatest need.
Section 123492 of the Health and Safety Code is 
17amended to read:
(a) The department shall develop a grant application 
19and award grants on a competitive basis to counties for the startup, 
20continuation, and expansion of the Nurse-Family Partnership 
21program established pursuant to Section 123491 and other 
22evidence-based home visiting programs.
				  To be eligible to receive 
23a grant for purposes of that section, a county shall agree to do all 
24of the following:
25(1) Serve through the program only pregnant, low-income 
26women who have had no previous live births. Notwithstanding 
27subdivision (b) of Section 123485, women who are juvenile 
28offenders or who are clients of the juvenile system shall be deemed 
29eligible for services under the program.
30(2) Enroll women in the program while they are still pregnant, 
31before the 28th week of gestation, and preferably before the 16th 
32week of gestation, and continue those women in the program 
33through the first two years of the child’s life.
34(3) Use as home visitors only registered nurses who have been 
35licensed in the state.
36(4) Have nurse home visitors undergo training according to the 
37program and follow the home visit guidelines developed by the 
38Nurse-Family Partnership program.
39(5) Have nurse home visitors specially trained in prenatal care 
40and early child development.
P7    1(6) Have nurse home visitors follow a visit schedule keyed to 
2the developmental stages of pregnancy and early childhood.
3(7) Ensure that, to the extent possible, services shall be rendered 
4in a culturally and linguistically competent manner.
5(8) Limit a nurse home visitor’s caseload to no more than 25 
6active families at
				  any given time.
7(9) Provide for every eight nurse home visitors a full-time nurse 
8supervisor who holds at least a bachelor’s degree in nursing and 
9has substantial experience in community health nursing.
10(10) Have nurse home visitors and nurse supervisors trained in 
11effective home visitation techniques by qualified trainers.
12(11) Have nurse home visitors and nurse supervisors trained in 
13the method of assessing early infant development and parent-child 
14interaction in a manner consistent with the program.
15(12) Provide data on operations, results, and expenditures in the 
16formats and with the frequencies specified by the department.
17(13) Collaborate with other home visiting and family support 
18programs in the community to avoid duplication of services and 
19complement and integrate with existing services to the extent 
20practicable.
21(14) Demonstrate that adoption of the Nurse-Family Partnership 
22program is supported by a local governmental or 
23government-affiliated community planning board, decisionmaking 
24board, or advisory body responsible for assuring the availability 
25of effective, coordinated services for families and children in the
26
				  community.
27(15) Provide cash or in-kind matching funds in the amount of 
28100 percent of the grant award.
29(16) Prohibit the use of moneys received for the program as a 
30match for grants currently administered by the department.
31(b) The department shall, in consultation with stakeholders and 
32the State Department of Health Care Services, develop and 
33implement a plan on or before January 1, 2017, to ensure that 
34Nurse-Family Partnership and other evidence-based nurse home 
35visiting programs are offered and provided to all Medi-Cal eligible 
36pregnant women.
begin insertSection 14148.25 is added to the end insertbegin insertHealth and Safety 
38Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
(a) The department shall, in consultation with 
40stakeholders, develop and implement a plan on or before January 
P8    11, 2017, to ensure that evidence-based home visiting programs 
2are offered and provided to all Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and 
3parenting women. The department shall consider all of the 
4following in developing the plan:
5(1) Establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home 
6visiting program services.
7(2) Incentives for providers to offer evidence-based home visiting 
8program services.
9(3) Other mechanisms to fund evidence-based home visiting 
10program services.
11(4) Identifying among evidence-based home visiting programs 
12those with established evidence to improve health outcomes, the 
13experience of care, and cost savings to the health care system.
14(b) (1) The department shall, on or before January 1, 2022, 
15and every five years thereafter, report to the Legislature on 
16implementation progress and the effectiveness of evidence-based 
17home visiting services in improving maternal and child health 
18outcomes, the experience of care, and cost savings to the Medi-Cal 
19program and the state.
20(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be 
21submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government 
22Code.
23(c) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions 
24shall apply:
25(1) “Evidence-based program” means a program that is based 
26on scientific evidence demonstrating that the program model is 
27effective. An evidence-based program shall be reviewed on site 
28and compared to program model standards by the model developer 
29or the developer’s designee at least every five years to ensure that 
30the program continues to maintain fidelity with the program model. 
31The program model shall have had demonstrated and replicated 
32significant and sustained positive outcomes that have been in one 
33or more well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled 
34research designs, and the evaluation results shall have been 
35published in a peer-reviewed journal.
36(2) “Evidence-based home visiting program” means a program 
37or initiative that does all of the following:
38(A) Meets, on or before April 1, 2015, the United States
39
						Department of Health and Human Services Maternal, Infant, and 
40Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) criteria, as described 
P9    1in Section 511(d)(3)(A)(i)(l) of Title V of the Social Security Act 
2(42 U.S.C. Sec. 711).
3(B) Contains home visiting as a primary service delivery strategy 
4by providers satisfying home visiting program requirements to 
5provide services to families with a pregnant or parenting woman 
6who is eligible for medical assistance.
7(C) Offers services on a voluntary basis to pregnant women, 
8expectant fathers, and parents and caregivers of children from 
9prenatal to five years of age.
10(D) Targets participant outcomes that include all of the 
11following:
12(i) Improved maternal and child health.
13(ii) Prevention of child injuries, child abuse or maltreatment, 
14and reduction of emergency department visits.
15(iii) Improvements in school readiness and achievement.
16(iv) Reduction in crime or domestic violence.
17(v) Improvements in family economic self-sufficiency.
18(vi) Improvements in coordination of, and referrals to, other 
19community resources and support.
20(vii) Improvements in parenting skills related to child 
21development.
O
96