AB 50, as amended, Mullin. Medi-Cal: evidence-based home visiting programs.
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including perinatal services for pregnant women.
Existing law establishes the Nurse-Family Partnership program, which is administered by the State Department of Public Health, to provide grants for voluntary nurse home visiting programs for expectant first-time mothers, their children, and their families. Under existing law, a county is required to satisfy specified requirements in order to be eligible to receive a grant.
This bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services, in consultation withbegin insert specifiedend insert
			 stakeholders, to developbegin delete and implementend delete a plan on or before January 1, 2017, to ensure that evidence-based home visiting programs are offered and provided to Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and parenting women, and would require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, to report to the Legislature, as specified. The bill would also require the department, in developing the plan, to consider, among other things, establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home visiting program services and incentives forbegin insert Medi-Calend insert providers to offer thosebegin delete services.end deletebegin insert services, and would require the department, in developing the
			 plan, to prioritize the identification of funding sources, other than General Fund moneys, to fund evidence-based home visiting program servicesend insertbegin insert.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the 
2following:
3(a) According to United States Census Bureau, California has 
4a poverty rate of 23.5 percent, the highest rate of any state in the 
5country.
6(b) Children born into poverty are at higher risk of health and 
7developmental disparities, including, but not limited to, premature 
8birth, low birth weight, infant mortality, crime, domestic violence, 
9developmental delays, dropping out of high school, substance 
10abuse, unemployment, and child abuse and neglect.
11(c) In 2014, the
				Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent 
12Resolution No. 155 by Assembly Member Raul Bocanegra, 
13recognizing that research over the last two decades in the evolving 
14fields of neuroscience, molecular biology, public health, genomics, 
15and epigenetics reveals that experiences in the first few years of 
16life build changes into the biology of the human body that, in turn, 
17influence the person’s physical and mental health over his or her 
18lifetime.
19(d) On May 3, 2012, Governor Edmundbegin delete G,end deletebegin insert G.end insert Brown Jr. issued 
20Executive Order B-19-12, establishing the “Let’s Get Healthy 
21California Task Force” to develop a 10-year plan for improving 
22the health of Californians, controlling health care
				costs, promoting 
23personal responsibility for individual health, and advancing health
24begin delete equity.”end deletebegin insert end insertbegin insertequity.end insert
P3    1(e) The task force identified several priorities, including a subset 
2for “Healthy Beginnings,” which include reducing infant deaths, 
3increasing vaccination rates, reducing childhood trauma, and 
4reducing adolescent tobacco use.
5(f) The final report of the task force states “the challenge going 
6forward is to identify evidence-based interventions and quicken 
7the pace of uptake across the state,” in order to meet
				the ambitious 
8goals in the Governor’s directive.
9(g) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting programs, such as 
10Nurse-Family Partnership, Healthy Families America, Early Head 
11Start (Home-Based Program Option), Parents as Teachers, and 
12Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, strengthen 
13the critical parent-child relationship and connect families with 
14information and resources during the pivotal time from pregnancy 
15to five years of age. Extensive research has shown that 
16evidence-based home visiting programs serving pregnant and 
17parenting mothers, prenatal to the child turning five years of age, 
18increase family self-sufficiency, positive parenting practices, child 
19literacy and school readiness, and maternal and child health.
20(h) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting
				program models 
21the prenatal to five years of age range from low to high intensity, 
22reflecting the broad spectrum of family needs that home visiting
23 can impact. Many experts hail home visiting program diversity as 
24essential to providing parents with choices and ensuring that 
25programs are well matched with local needs and strengths, as well 
26as responsive to the diverse needs of California’s children and 
27families. 
28(i) In 2013, more than 248,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries gave 
29birth to a child. Because Medi-Cal covers half of all births in the 
30state, this has increased costs for taxpayers. Medi-Cal expansion 
31has resulted in an 18 percent increase in Medi-Cal enrollment to 
32a total of 11.3 million, and enrollment is expected to exceed 12 
33million in 2015.
34(j) The California Health
				and Human Services Agency recently 
35submitted its State Health Care Innovation Plan, including the 
36Maternity Care initiative, which addresses issues of high costs in 
37maternity care, to the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid 
38Innovation. Child deliveries and related expenses, including 
39high-risk births, rank among the top 10 high-cost episodes of health 
P4    1care, and in the last 15 years, California has seen a continual rise 
2in maternal mortality.
3(k) The cost of health care specifically related to high-risk 
4pregnancies, neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU) services, toxic 
5stress, and emergency room visits has increased and is projected 
6to continue to rise. Average health care costs for women were 25 
7percent more than men primarily due to higher costs of health care 
8during childbearing years.
9(l) With more than three decades of evidence from randomized, 
10controlled trials and rigorous followup evaluation studies, 
11evidence-based home visiting programs have demonstrated 
12sustained improvements in maternal health, child health, positive 
13parenting practices, child development and school readiness, 
14reductions in child maltreatment, family economic self-sufficiency, 
15linkages and referrals, and reductions in family violence.
16(m) Evidence-based home visiting programs have specifically 
17demonstrated reductions in preterm births, preventable maternal 
18mortality, smoking during pregnancy, complications of pregnancy, 
19closely spaced subsequent births, childhood injuries resulting in 
20costly emergency department use and hospitalizations, improved 
21childhood immunization rates, compliance with well child visit 
22schedules, lower body mass
				index rates, higher birth weights, and 
23improved family well-being, including increased family health 
24literacy, and parent self-help development. As a result of families 
25benefiting from evidence-based home visiting, therebegin delete hasend deletebegin insert
				haveend insert been 
26cost savings to federal, state, and local governments with respect 
27to programs and services, including Medicaid, the Supplemental 
28Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and the Temporary 
29Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. 
30(n) The strong evidence of effectiveness and predictable return 
31on investment demonstrate that evidence-based home visiting 
32programs should be brought to scale in California to improve 
33maternal and child health outcomes and help reduce health care 
34costs for generations to come.
35(o) By supporting families from the start, voluntary 
36evidence-based home visiting programs serving families from 
37prenatal to five years of age provide a foundation for subsequent 
38early childhood programs and family
				support efforts to build upon, 
39and can help ensure that families are well-equipped to raise 
P5    1California’s next generation of productive, healthy, and successful 
2adults.
3(p) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to develop a 
4means to leverage public and private dollars to substantially expand 
5the scale of evidence-based home visiting programs throughout 
6California, beginning with communities and populations with the 
7greatest need.
Section 14148.25 is added to the Health and Safety 
9Code, to read:
(a) The department shall, in consultation with 
11stakeholders,begin insert including, but not limited to, representatives from 
12Medi-Cal managed care plans, public and private hospitals, 
13evidence-based home visiting programs, and local governments,end insert
14 developbegin delete and implementend delete a plan on or before January 1, 2017, to 
15ensure that evidence-based home visiting programs are offered 
16and provided tobegin delete allend delete Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and parenting 
17women.begin insert
						The department shall consult with stakeholdersend insertbegin insert from 
18diverse geographical regions of the state.end insert The department shall 
19consider all of the following in developing the plan:
20(1) Establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home 
21visiting program services.
22(2) Incentives forbegin insert Medi-Calend insert providers to offer evidence-based 
23home visiting program services.
24(3) Other mechanisms to fund evidence-based home visiting 
25programbegin delete services.end deletebegin insert
						services for Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and 
26parenting women.end insert
27(4) Identifying among evidence-based home visiting programs 
28those with established evidence to improve health outcomes, the 
29experience of care, and cost savings to the health care system.
30(b) In developing the plan, the department shall prioritize the 
31identification of funding sources, other than General Fund moneys, 
32to fund evidence-based home visiting program services, including 
33local, federal, or private funds, or any other funds made available 
34for these program services.
35(b)
end delete
36begin insert(end insertbegin insertc)end insert (1) begin deleteThe end deletebegin insertNotwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government 
37Code, the end insertdepartment shall, on or before January 1, 2022, and 
38every five years thereafter, report to the Legislature on 
39implementation progress and the effectiveness of evidence-based 
40home visiting services in improving maternal and child health 
P6    1outcomes, the experience of care, and cost savings to the Medi-Cal 
2program and the state.
3(2) A report to be
						submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be 
4submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government 
5Code.
6(c)
end delete
7begin insert(end insertbegin insertd)end insert For the purposes of this section, the following definitions 
8shall apply:
9(1) “Evidence-based program” means a program that is based 
10on scientific evidence demonstrating that the program model is 
11effective. An evidence-based program shall be reviewed on site 
12and compared to program model standards by the model developer 
13or
						the developer’s designee at least every five years to ensure that 
14the program continues to maintain fidelity with the program model. 
15The program model shall have had demonstrated and replicated 
16significant and sustained positive outcomes that have been in one 
17or more well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled research 
18designs, and the evaluation results shall have been published in a 
19peer-reviewed journal.
20(2) “Evidence-based home visiting program” means a program 
21or initiative that does all of the following:
22(A) Meets, on or before April 1, 2015, the United States
23
						Department of Health and Human Services Maternal, Infant, and 
24Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) criteria, as described 
25in Section 511(d)(3)(A)(i)(l) of Title V of the Social Security Act 
26(42 U.S.C. Sec. 711).
27(B) Contains home visiting as a primary service delivery strategy 
28by providers satisfying home visiting program requirements to 
29provide services to families with a pregnant or parenting woman 
30who is eligible for medical assistance.
31(C) Offers services on a voluntary basis to pregnant women, 
32expectant fathers, and parents and caregivers of children from 
33prenatal to five years of age.
34(D) Targets participant outcomes that include all of the 
35following:
36(i) Improved maternal and child health.
37(ii) Prevention of child injuries, child abuse or maltreatment, 
38and reduction of emergency department visits.
39(iii) Improvements in school readiness and achievement.
40(iv) Reduction in crime or domestic violence.
P7 1(v) Improvements in family economic self-sufficiency.
2(vi) Improvements in coordination of, and referrals to, other 
3community resources and support.
4(vii) Improvements in parenting skills related to child 
5development.
O
95