Amended in Senate September 1, 2015

Amended in Assembly May 21, 2015

Amended in Assembly May 13, 2015

Amended in Assembly April 21, 2015

Amended in Assembly April 6, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 50


Introduced by Assembly Member Mullin

December 1, 2014


An act to add Section 14148.25 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to perinatal care.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 50, as amended, Mullin. Medi-Cal: evidence-based home visiting programs.

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including perinatal services for pregnant women.

Existing law establishes the Nurse-Family Partnership program, which is administered by the State Department of Public Health, to provide grants for voluntary nurse home visiting programs for expectant first-time mothers, their children, and their families. Under existing law, a county is required to satisfy specified requirements in order to be eligible to receive a grant.

This bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services, in consultation with specified stakeholders, to develop a plan on or before January 1, 2017, tobegin delete ensure thatend deletebegin insert determine the feasibility of offeringend insert evidence-based home visiting programsbegin delete are offered and providedend delete to Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and parentingbegin delete women, and would require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, to report to the Legislature, as specified.end deletebegin insert women.end insert The bill would also require the department, in developing the plan, to consider, among other things, establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home visiting program services and incentives for Medi-Cal providers to offer those services, and would require the department, in developing the plan, to prioritize the identification of funding sources, other than General Fund moneys, to fund evidence-based home visiting program services.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) According to United States Census Bureau, California has
4a poverty rate of 23.5 percent, the highest rate of any state in the
5country.

6(b) Children born into poverty are at higher risk of health and
7developmental disparities, including, but not limited to, premature
8birth, low birth weight, infant mortality, crime, domestic violence,
9developmental delays, dropping out of high school, substance
10abuse, unemployment, and child abuse and neglect.

11(c) In 2014, the Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent
12Resolution No. 155 by Assembly Member Raul Bocanegra,
13recognizing that research over the last two decades in the evolving
14fields of neuroscience, molecular biology, public health, genomics,
15and epigenetics reveals that experiences in the first few years of
16life build changes into the biology of the human body that, in turn,
17influence the person’s physical and mental health over his or her
18lifetime.

19(d) On May 3, 2012, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. issued
20Executive Order B-19-12, establishing the “Let’s Get Healthy
21California Task Force” to develop a 10-year plan for improving
P3    1the health of Californians, controlling health care costs, promoting
2personal responsibility for individual health, and advancing health
3equity.

4(e) The task force identified several priorities, including a subset
5for “Healthy Beginnings,” which include reducing infant deaths,
6increasing vaccination rates, reducing childhood trauma, and
7reducing adolescent tobacco use.

8(f) The final report of the task forcebegin delete statesend deletebegin insert states,end insert “the challenge
9going forward is to identify evidence-based interventions and
10quicken the pace of uptake across thebegin delete state,”end deletebegin insert state”end insert in order to
11meet the ambitious goals in the Governor’s directive.

12(g) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting programs, such as
13Nurse-Family Partnership, Healthy Families America, Early Head
14Start (Home-Based Program Option), Parents as Teachers, and
15Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, strengthen
16the critical parent-child relationship and connect families with
17information and resources during the pivotal time from pregnancy
18to five years of age. Extensive research has shown that
19evidence-based home visiting programs serving pregnant and
20parenting mothers, prenatal to the child turning five years of age,
21increase family self-sufficiency, positive parenting practices, child
22literacy and school readiness, and maternal and child health.

23(h) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting program models
24the prenatal to five years of age range from low to high intensity,
25reflecting the broad spectrum of family needs that home visiting
26can impact. Many experts hail home visiting program diversity as
27essential to providing parents with choices and ensuring that
28programs are well matched with local needs and strengths, as well
29as responsive to the diverse needs of California’s children and
30families.

31(i) In 2013, more than 248,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries gave
32birth to a child. Because Medi-Cal covers half of all births in the
33state, this has increased costs for taxpayers. Medi-Cal expansion
34has resulted in an 18 percent increase in Medi-Cal enrollment to
35a total of 11.3 million, and enrollment is expected to exceed 12
36million in 2015.

37(j) The California Health and Human Services Agency recently
38submitted its State Health Care Innovation Plan, including the
39Maternity Care initiative, which addresses issues of high costs in
40maternity care, to the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid
P4    1Innovation. Child deliveries and related expenses, including
2high-risk births, rank among the top 10 high-cost episodes of health
3care, and in the last 15 years, California has seen a continual rise
4in maternal mortality.

5(k) The cost of health care specifically related to high-risk
6pregnancies, neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU) services, toxic
7stress, and emergency room visits has increased and is projected
8to continue to rise. Average health care costs for women were 25
9percent more than men primarily due to higher costs of health care
10during childbearing years.

11(l) With more than three decades of evidence from randomized,
12controlled trials and rigorous followup evaluation studies,
13evidence-based home visiting programs have demonstrated
14sustained improvements in maternal health, child health, positive
15parenting practices, child development and school readiness,
16reductions in child maltreatment, family economic self-sufficiency,
17linkages and referrals, and reductions in family violence.

18(m) Evidence-based home visiting programs have specifically
19demonstrated reductions in preterm births, preventable maternal
20 mortality, smoking during pregnancy, complications of pregnancy,
21closely spaced subsequent births, childhood injuries resulting in
22costly emergency department use and hospitalizations, improved
23childhood immunization rates, compliance with well child visit
24schedules, lower body mass index rates, higher birth weights, and
25improved family well-being, including increased family health
26literacy, and parent self-help development. As a result of families
27benefiting from evidence-based home visiting, there have been
28cost savings to federal, state, and local governments with respect
29to programs and services, including Medicaid, the Supplemental
30Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and the Temporary
31Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.

32(n) The strong evidence of effectiveness and predictable return
33on investment demonstrate that evidence-based home visiting
34programs should be brought to scale in California to improve
35maternal and child health outcomes and help reduce health care
36costs for generations to come.

37(o) By supporting families from the start, voluntary
38evidence-based home visiting programs serving families from
39prenatal to five years of age provide a foundation for subsequent
40early childhood programs and family support efforts to build upon,
P5    1and can help ensure that families are well-equipped to raise
2California’s next generation of productive, healthy, and successful
3adults.

4(p) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to develop a
5means to leverage public and private dollars to substantially expand
6the scale of evidence-based home visiting programs throughout
7California, beginning with communities and populations with the
8greatest need.

9

SEC. 2.  

Section 14148.25 is added to the Health and Safety
10Code
, to read:

11

14148.25.  

(a) The department shall, in consultation with
12stakeholders, including, but not limited to, representatives from
13Medi-Cal managed care plans, public and private hospitals,
14evidence-based home visiting programs, and local governments,
15develop a plan on or before January 1, 2017, tobegin delete ensure thatend delete
16begin insert determine the feasibility of offeringend insert evidence-based home visiting
17programsbegin delete are offered and providedend delete to Medi-Cal eligible pregnant
18and parenting women. The department shall consult with
19stakeholders from diverse geographical regions of the state. The
20department shall consider all of the following in developing the
21plan:

22(1) Establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home
23visiting program services.

24(2) Incentives for Medi-Cal providers to offer evidence-based
25home visiting program services.

26(3) Other mechanisms to fund evidence-based home visiting
27program services for Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and parenting
28women.

29(4) Identifying among evidence-based home visiting programs
30those with established evidence to improve health outcomes, the
31experience of care, and cost savings to the health care system.

32(b) In developing the plan, the department shall prioritize the
33identification of funding sources, other than General Fund moneys,
34to fund evidence-based home visiting program services, including
35local, federal, or private funds, or any other funds made available
36for these program services.

begin delete

37(c) (1) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government
38Code, the department shall, on or before January 1, 2022, and
39every five years thereafter, report to the Legislature on
40implementation progress and the effectiveness of evidence-based
P6    1home visiting services in improving maternal and child health
2outcomes, the experience of care, and cost savings to the Medi-Cal
3program and the state.

4(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be
5submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
6Code.

7(d)

end delete

8begin insert(c)end insert For the purposes of this section, the following definitions
9shall apply:

10(1) “Evidence-based program” means a program that is based
11on scientific evidence demonstrating that the program model is
12effective. An evidence-based program shall be reviewed on site
13and compared to program model standards by the model developer
14or the developer’s designee at least every five years to ensure that
15the program continues to maintain fidelity with the program model.
16The program model shall have had demonstrated and replicated
17significant and sustained positive outcomes that have been in one
18or more well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled research
19designs, and the evaluation results shall have been published in a
20peer-reviewed journal.

21(2) “Evidence-based home visiting program” means a program
22or initiative that does all of the following:

23(A) Meets, on or before April 1, 2015, the United States
24 Department of Health and Human Services Maternal, Infant, and
25Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) criteria, as described
26in Section 511(d)(3)(A)(i)(l) of Title V of the Social Security Act
27(42 U.S.C. Sec. 711).

28(B) Contains home visiting as a primary service delivery strategy
29by providers satisfying home visiting program requirements to
30provide services to families with a pregnant or parenting woman
31who is eligible for medical assistance.

32(C) Offers services on a voluntary basis to pregnant women,
33expectant fathers, and parents and caregivers of children from
34prenatal to five years of age.

35(D) Targets participant outcomes that include all of the
36following:

37(i) Improved maternal and child health.

38(ii) Prevention of child injuries, child abuse or maltreatment,
39and reduction of emergency department visits.

40(iii) Improvements in school readiness and achievement.

P7    1(iv) Reduction in crime or domestic violence.

2(v) Improvements in family economic self-sufficiency.

3(vi) Improvements in coordination of, and referrals to, other
4community resources and support.

5(vii) Improvements in parenting skills related to child
6development.



O

    94