AB 50, as amended, Mullin. Medi-Cal: evidence-based home visiting programs.
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including perinatal services for pregnant women.
Existing law establishes the Nurse-Family Partnership program, which is administered by the State Department of Public Health, to provide grants for voluntary nurse home visiting programs for expectant first-time mothers, their children, and their families. Under existing law, a county is required to satisfy specified requirements in order to be eligible to receive a grant.
This bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services, in consultation with specified stakeholders, to develop a plan on or before January 1, 2017, tobegin delete ensure thatend deletebegin insert
			 determine the feasibility of offeringend insert evidence-based home visiting programsbegin delete are offered and providedend delete to Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and parentingbegin delete women, and would require the department, on or before January 1, 2022, and every 5 years thereafter, to report to the Legislature, as specified.end deletebegin insert women.end insert The bill would also require the department, in developing the plan, to consider, among other things, establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home visiting program services and incentives for Medi-Cal providers to offer those services, and would require the department, in developing the plan, to prioritize the identification of funding sources, other than General Fund moneys, to fund evidence-based home
			 visiting program services.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the 
2following:
3(a) According to United States Census Bureau, California has 
4a poverty rate of 23.5 percent, the highest rate of any state in the 
5country.
6(b) Children born into poverty are at higher risk of health and 
7developmental disparities, including, but not limited to, premature 
8birth, low birth weight, infant mortality, crime, domestic violence, 
9developmental delays, dropping out of high school, substance 
10abuse, unemployment, and child abuse and neglect.
11(c) In 2014, the
				Legislature passed Assembly Concurrent 
12Resolution No. 155 by Assembly Member Raul Bocanegra, 
13recognizing that research over the last two decades in the evolving 
14fields of neuroscience, molecular biology, public health, genomics, 
15and epigenetics reveals that experiences in the first few years of 
16life build changes into the biology of the human body that, in turn, 
17influence the person’s physical and mental health over his or her 
18lifetime.
19(d) On May 3, 2012, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. issued 
20Executive Order B-19-12, establishing the “Let’s Get Healthy 
21California Task Force” to develop a 10-year plan for improving 
P3    1the health of Californians, controlling health care costs, promoting 
2personal responsibility for individual health, and advancing health 
3equity.
4(e) The
				task force identified several priorities, including a subset 
5for “Healthy Beginnings,” which include reducing infant deaths, 
6increasing vaccination rates, reducing childhood trauma, and 
7reducing adolescent tobacco use.
8(f) The final report of the task forcebegin delete statesend deletebegin insert states,end insert “the challenge 
9going forward is to identify evidence-based interventions and 
10quicken the pace of uptake across thebegin delete state,”end deletebegin insert state”end insert in order to 
11meet the ambitious goals in the Governor’s directive.
12(g) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting programs, such as 
13Nurse-Family Partnership, Healthy Families America, Early Head 
14Start (Home-Based Program Option), Parents as Teachers, and 
15Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters, strengthen 
16the critical parent-child relationship and connect families with 
17information and resources during the pivotal time from pregnancy 
18to five years of age. Extensive research has shown that 
19evidence-based home visiting programs serving pregnant and 
20parenting mothers, prenatal to the child turning five years of age, 
21increase family self-sufficiency, positive parenting practices, child 
22literacy and school readiness, and maternal and child health.
23(h) Voluntary evidence-based home visiting program models 
24the prenatal to five years of age range from low to high intensity, 
25reflecting the broad
				spectrum of family needs that home visiting 
26can impact. Many experts hail home visiting program diversity as 
27essential to providing parents with choices and ensuring that 
28programs are well matched with local needs and strengths, as well 
29as responsive to the diverse needs of California’s children and 
30families. 
31(i) In 2013, more than 248,000 Medi-Cal beneficiaries gave 
32birth to a child. Because Medi-Cal covers half of all births in the 
33state, this has increased costs for taxpayers. Medi-Cal expansion 
34has resulted in an 18 percent increase in Medi-Cal enrollment to 
35a total of 11.3 million, and enrollment is expected to exceed 12 
36million in 2015.
37(j) The California Health and Human Services Agency recently 
38submitted its State Health Care Innovation Plan, including the 
39Maternity
				Care initiative, which addresses issues of high costs in 
40maternity care, to the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid 
P4    1Innovation. Child deliveries and related expenses, including 
2high-risk births, rank among the top 10 high-cost episodes of health 
3care, and in the last 15 years, California has seen a continual rise 
4in maternal mortality.
5(k) The cost of health care specifically related to high-risk 
6pregnancies, neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU) services, toxic 
7stress, and emergency room visits has increased and is projected 
8to continue to rise. Average health care costs for women were 25 
9percent more than men primarily due to higher costs of health care 
10during childbearing years.
11(l) With more than three decades of evidence from randomized, 
12controlled trials and rigorous
				followup evaluation studies, 
13evidence-based home visiting programs have demonstrated 
14sustained improvements in maternal health, child health, positive 
15parenting practices, child development and school readiness, 
16reductions in child maltreatment, family economic self-sufficiency, 
17linkages and referrals, and reductions in family violence.
18(m) Evidence-based home visiting programs have specifically 
19demonstrated reductions in preterm births, preventable maternal
20 mortality, smoking during pregnancy, complications of pregnancy, 
21closely spaced subsequent births, childhood injuries resulting in 
22costly emergency department use and hospitalizations, improved 
23childhood immunization rates, compliance with well child visit 
24schedules, lower body mass index rates, higher birth weights, and 
25improved family well-being, including increased family health 
26literacy,
				and parent self-help development. As a result of families 
27benefiting from evidence-based home visiting, there have been 
28cost savings to federal, state, and local governments with respect 
29to programs and services, including Medicaid, the Supplemental 
30Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and the Temporary 
31Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. 
32(n) The strong evidence of effectiveness and predictable return 
33on investment demonstrate that evidence-based home visiting 
34programs should be brought to scale in California to improve 
35maternal and child health outcomes and help reduce health care 
36costs for generations to come.
37(o) By supporting families from the start, voluntary 
38evidence-based home visiting programs serving families from 
39prenatal to five years of age provide a
				foundation for subsequent 
40early childhood programs and family support efforts to build upon, 
P5    1and can help ensure that families are well-equipped to raise 
2California’s next generation of productive, healthy, and successful 
3adults.
4(p) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature to develop a 
5means to leverage public and private dollars to substantially expand 
6the scale of evidence-based home visiting programs throughout 
7California, beginning with communities and populations with the 
8greatest need.
Section 14148.25 is added to the Health and Safety 
10Code, to read:
(a) The department shall, in consultation with 
12stakeholders, including, but not limited to, representatives from 
13Medi-Cal managed care plans, public and private hospitals, 
14evidence-based home visiting programs, and local governments, 
15develop a plan on or before January 1, 2017, tobegin delete ensure thatend delete
16begin insert determine the feasibility of offeringend insert evidence-based home visiting 
17programsbegin delete are offered and providedend delete to Medi-Cal eligible pregnant 
18and parenting women. The department shall consult
						with 
19stakeholders from diverse geographical regions of the state. The 
20department shall consider all of the following in developing the 
21plan:
22(1) Establishing Medi-Cal coverage for evidence-based home 
23visiting program services.
24(2) Incentives for Medi-Cal providers to offer evidence-based 
25home visiting program services.
26(3) Other mechanisms to fund evidence-based home visiting 
27program services for Medi-Cal eligible pregnant and parenting 
28women.
29(4) Identifying among evidence-based home visiting programs 
30those with established evidence to improve health outcomes, the 
31experience of care, and cost savings to the health care system.
32(b) In developing the plan, the department shall prioritize the 
33identification of funding sources, other than General Fund moneys, 
34to fund evidence-based home visiting program services, including 
35local, federal, or private funds, or any other funds made available 
36for these program services.
37(c) (1) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government 
38Code, the department shall, on or before January 1, 2022, and 
39every five years thereafter, report to the Legislature on 
40implementation progress and the effectiveness of evidence-based 
P6    1home visiting services in improving maternal and child health 
2outcomes, the experience of care, and cost savings to the Medi-Cal 
3program and the state.
4(2) A report to be
						submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be 
5submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government 
6Code.
7(d)
end delete
8begin insert(c)end insert For the purposes of this section, the following definitions 
9shall apply:
10(1) “Evidence-based program” means a program that is based 
11on scientific evidence demonstrating that the program model is 
12effective. An evidence-based program shall be reviewed on site 
13and compared to program model standards by the model developer 
14or the developer’s designee at least every five years to ensure that 
15the program continues to maintain fidelity with the program model. 
16The
						program model shall have had demonstrated and replicated 
17significant and sustained positive outcomes that have been in one 
18or more well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled research 
19designs, and the evaluation results shall have been published in a 
20peer-reviewed journal.
21(2) “Evidence-based home visiting program” means a program 
22or initiative that does all of the following:
23(A) Meets, on or before April 1, 2015, the United States
24
						Department of Health and Human Services Maternal, Infant, and 
25Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) criteria, as described 
26in Section 511(d)(3)(A)(i)(l) of Title V of the Social Security Act 
27(42 U.S.C. Sec. 711).
28(B) Contains home visiting as a primary service delivery strategy 
29by providers satisfying home visiting program requirements to 
30provide services to families with a pregnant or parenting woman 
31who is eligible for medical assistance.
32(C) Offers services on a voluntary basis to pregnant women, 
33expectant fathers, and parents and caregivers of children from 
34prenatal to five years of age.
35(D) Targets participant outcomes that include all of the 
36following:
37(i) Improved maternal and child health.
38(ii) Prevention of child injuries, child abuse or maltreatment, 
39and reduction of emergency department visits.
40(iii) Improvements in school readiness and achievement.
P7 1(iv) Reduction in crime or domestic violence.
2(v) Improvements in family economic self-sufficiency.
3(vi) Improvements in coordination of, and referrals to, other 
4community resources and support.
5(vii) Improvements in parenting skills related to child 
6development.
O
94