ACR 38, as amended, Brown. California Task Force on Family Caregiving.
This measure would establish the California Task Force on Family Caregiving, tobegin delete collaborate with a broad range of stakeholders to examine resources available to caregivers and make legislative recommendations regarding the development of an Internet Web site containing resources for caregivers, the enhancement of outreach and education efforts, and the development of a caregiver screening and assessment tool.end deletebegin insert meet monthly to examine issues relative to the challenges faced by family caregivers and opportunities to improve caregiver support, review the current network and the services and supports available to caregivers, and make policy recommendations to the Legislature.end insert The task force would be
required to submit an interim report to the Legislature no later than January 1, 2017, and a final report no later than July 1, 2018.
Fiscal committee: no.
P2 1WHEREAS, A caregiver can be any relative, spouse, partner,
2friend, or neighbor who has a significant relationship with, and
3who provides a broad range of assistance to, an older person or an
4adult with a chronic or disabling condition; and
5WHEREAS, Almost three-fourths of older people living in a
6typical community who receive personal assistance rely exclusively
7on unpaid caregivers for help; and
8WHEREAS, At present, there is no complete inventory of
9caregiving programs available to Californians performing unpaid
10caregiving services for an aging or disabled family member, friend,
11or neighbor; and
12WHEREAS, An estimated 5.8 million adults in the state provide
13care to adult relatives or friends, which equates to an estimated
143.9 billion hours a year at an estimated value of $47 billion each
15year; and
16WHEREAS, The economic value of caregivers’ unpaid
17contributions is equivalent to 1.25 times the total Medi-Cal
18spending, and 4.1 times the funding allotted to Medi-Cal long-term
19services and supports; and
20WHEREAS, If family caregivers were no longer available, the
21economic cost to California’s health care and long-term services
22and supports systems would increase astronomically; and
23WHEREAS, Family support is a key driver in remaining in
24one’s home and community, but it comes at substantial physical,
25emotional, and financial cost to the caregivers, their families, and
26to society; and
27WHEREAS, Fifty-nine percent of all family caregivers are
28employed full or part time and family caregivers typically spend
2920 hours a week caring for a family member who needs help with
30bathing, dressing, and other kinds of personal care, as well as
31household tasks such as shopping and managing finances; and
32WHEREAS, Seventy percent of people with Alzheimer’s disease
33or a related disorder live at home and need assistance with activities
34of daily living; and
35WHEREAS, Testimony and data acquired during an Assembly
36“Faces of Aging” hearing series in 2014, conducted by the
37Assembly Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, documented
38variations in the way different populations respond to caregiving
39needs and responsibilities, thus informing policymakers of specific
40cultural competencies necessary to meet a diverse population’s
P3 1needs, as well as specific untapped resources and strategies that
2could relieve caregiver stress; and
3WHEREAS, It is critical to family caregivers for there to be a
4state-led effort to compile an inventory of the resources available
5to family caregivers, determine where access barriers in the current
6system exist, and consider the cultural and linguistic factors that
7impact caregivers and care recipients who are from diverse
8populations; and
9WHEREAS, Consistency of access across the counties is critical
10for caregivers and the vulnerable population they serve, so the
11best practices in California and in other states should be identified
12and considered as means to improve caregiving programs; and
13WHEREAS, Technology is a critical tool for family caregivers,
14and the development of an internet Web site or portal that contains
15information about California’s current resources and supports
16available in the state’s family caregivers’ community will help
17family caregivers better navigate current support services; and
18WHEREAS, To successfully address the surging population of
19older adults who have significant needs for long-term services and
20supports, the state must develop methods to both encourage and
21support families to assist their aging loved ones and develop ways
22to recruit and retain a qualified, culturally competent, responsive
23in-home care workforce; now, therefore, be it
24Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
25thereof concurring, That the California Task Force on Family
26Caregiving is herebybegin delete established to examine and investigate issues begin insert established, which shall consist of
27relative to the challenges faced by family caregivers and
28opportunities to improve caregiver support, and to make specific
29policy recommendations along with legislative strategies to
30advance them; and be it furtherend delete
3120 members as follows:end insert
32(a) The
Speaker of the Assembly and the Senate Committee on
33Rules shall each appoint 10 members of the task force.
34(b) These 20 members shall include some who have
35demonstrated knowledge and expertise in any of the following:
36(1) Family caregiving.
end insertbegin insert37(2) Geriatric research.
end insertbegin insert38(3) Alzheimer’s disease research.
end insertbegin insert39(4) Senior advocacy; and be it further
end insert40Resolved, That the task force shall do all of the following:
P4 1(1) Review the current network and how the system, which
2provides information about community-based services and
3programs to support family caregivers of adults with chronic or
4disabling conditions, is set up and to consider improving how
5family caregivers access information about the services and
6supports available to them so that they can continue in their
7caregiving role without being overburdened.
8(2) Consider the recommendations of other state plans,
9including, but not limited to, the Olmstead Plan, the Strategic Plan
10for an Aging California Population, the State Plan for Alzheimer’s
11Disease, and the State Plan on Aging.
12(3) Determine gaps in services to family caregivers and identify
13barriers to participation in current programs.
14(4) Consult with a broad range of stakeholders, including, but
15not limited to, people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, adults
16with disabling or chronic conditions, family caregivers,
17community-based and institutional providers, caregiving
18researchers and academicians, formal caregivers, caregiver resource
19centers, the California Commission on Aging, and other state
20entities.
21(5) Solicit testimony on the needs of family caregivers, including
22the designation of caregivers during care transitions, caregiver
23training, assessment of caregiver needs, respite services, medical
24leave policies, delegation of tasks to nonmedical aides, and other
25policies.
26(6) Assess information referral and resource
sharing systems
27used by family caregivers by doing all of the following:
28(A) Compiling an inventory of the resources available to family
29caregivers.
30(B) Determining access barriers in the current system.
31(C) Considering the cultural and linguistic factors that impact
32caregivers and care recipients who are from diverse populations.
33(D) Comparing consistency of access across the counties.
34(7) Identify best practices in California and in other states and
35explore expanding those best practices in caregiving programs to
36adult populations that are not currently receiving these services
37because they do not qualify based on income, diagnosis, or
38disability.
39(8) Make specific legislative recommendations that address, at
40a minimum, each of the following:
P5 1(A) The development of an Internet Web site or portal that
2contains a list of current resources and supports available in a
3family caregiver’s community, including the cultural competencies
4available, and the contact information of a person or organization
5that can help a family caregiver navigate these support services.
6(B) The enhancement of outreach and education efforts by area
7agencies on aging and family resource centers.
8(C) The development of a caregiver screening and assessment
9tool that will help identify which services and supports a family
10caregiver needs, including assessing caregivers of Medi-Cal
11recipients and beneficiaries.
12(9) Prepare and provide to the Legislature a report of its findings
13and recommendations on or before July 1, 2018; and be it further
14Resolved, That the task force shall consist of no more than 20
15members, one of whom shall be appointed by the President pro
16Tempore of the Senate and one of whom shall be appointed by the
17Speaker of the Assembly; and be it further
18Resolved, That the two members selected by the President pro
19Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the Assembly shall
20appoint the remaining members of the task force; and be it further
21Resolved, That the task force shall be under the direction of a
22chair, selected from among its members and appointed by the
23members of the task force; and be it further
24Resolved, That the task force shall perform the following
25duties:
26(a) Meet monthly to examine issues relative to the challenges
27faced by family caregivers and opportunities to improve caregiver
28support, review the current network and the services and supports
29available to caregivers, and make policy recommendations to the
30Legislature.
31(b) Consult, as necessary, with a broad range of stakeholders,
32including, but not limited to, family caregivers, community-based
33and institutional providers, caregiving researchers and academics,
34caregiver resource centers, and other state entities; and be it
35further
36Resolved, That the task force is encouraged to partner,
37whenever possible, with the California Commission on Aging in
38order to link the efforts of the Legislature and the administration;
39and be it further
P6 1Resolved, That state funds shall not be used to support task
2force activities, but the task force may solicit and accept private
3funds and in-kind donations from public and private foundations
4to pay expenses incurred in conducting its business. These expenses
5include, but are not limited to, staff, administrative, meeting, and
6other expenses incurred by task force members in the performance
7of their official duties; and be it further
8Resolved, That the task force shall be subject to the
9Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with
10Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
11the Government Code); and be it further
12Resolved, That the task force shall submit one or more reports
13to the Legislature and to the Governor, including an interim report
14no later than January 1, 2017, and a final report no later than July
151, 2018; and be it further
16Resolved, That the task force is authorized to act until July 31,
172018; and be it further
18Resolved, That the task force shall seek funding, technical
19assistance, and other resources from foundations and other
20organizations as long as that support would not pose any conflict
21of interest and would be deemed as consistent with the goals and
22objectives of the task force; and be it further
23Resolved, That the task force may seek staffing support from
24the University of Southern California Leonard Davis School of
25Gerontology upon receipt of private foundation funding; and be
26it further
27Resolved, That members of the task force shall serve without
28compensation, but shall receive reimbursement for travel and other
29necessary expenses actually incurred in the performance of their
30official duties; and be it further
31Resolved, That the task force shall meet every other month; and
32be it further
33Resolved, That members of the task force shall be appointed to
34serve for the duration of the task force; and be it further
35Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
36of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
O
98