Amended in Assembly April 11, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Concurrent ResolutionNo. 45


Introduced by Assembly Member Grove

March 11, 2015


Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 45—begin deleteRelative to state government. end deletebegin insertRelative to the Ukrainian Famine of 1932end insertbegin insert-1933. end insert

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

ACR 45, as amended, Grove. begin deleteState agency budgets: legislative review: zero-based budgeting. end deletebegin insertUkrainian Famine of 1932end insertbegin insert-1933.end insert

begin insertThis measure would remember and honor the millions of victims of the man-made Ukrainian Famine of 1932end insertbegin insert-1933, known as “Holodomor,” and their descendants who are living throughout California. The measure would also designate November 26, 2016, as Holodomor Remembrance Day.end insert

begin delete

This measure would state the intent of the Legislature to conduct an in-depth review of the budgets of the 40 largest budgets of state agencies and departments over a period 5 years using a zero-based budgeting approach, as specified. The measure would also request that the the first 8 state agencies and departments selected for review provide specified information to the Assembly Committee on Budget and the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review before June 30, 2016.

end delete

Fiscal committee: begin deleteyes end deletebegin insertnoend insert.

begin insert

P1    1
WHEREAS, The Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933, known as
2“Holodomor,” was a man-made famine that caused the deaths of
3at least five million innocent men, women, and children in Ukraine,
4resulting in an annihilation of an estimated 25 percent of the rural
P2    1population of that country, one of the most productive agricultural
2areas of the Soviet Union; and

end insert
begin insert

3
WHEREAS, This man-made famine also resulted in the deaths
4of an estimated one to two million people in regions outside
5Ukraine, mostly in the largely ethnic Ukrainian North Caucasus
6territory; and

end insert
begin insert

7
WHEREAS, These millions of people were starved to death by
8forced agricultural collectivization and grain seizures by the Soviet
9Union; and

end insert
begin insert

10
WHEREAS, Western observers and scholars who accurately
11reported on the existence of the famine as it was occurring were
12subjected to disparagement and criticism for their reporting; and

end insert
begin insert

13
WHEREAS, The Soviet Union and many scholars in the West
14denied the existence of the famine until the collapse of the Soviet
15Union in 1991 when Soviet Union archives became accessible,
16thereby making the documentation of the premeditated nature of
17the famine and its harsh enforcement possible; and

end insert
begin insert

18
WHEREAS, The final report of the U.S. Commission on the
19Ukraine Famine, established on December 13, 1985, concluded
20that the victims were “starved to death in a man-made famine;”
21and

end insert
begin insert

22
WHEREAS, Although the famine was one of the greatest losses
23of human life in the 20th century, its occurrence remains
24insufficiently known in the United States and throughout the world;
25and

end insert
begin insert

26
WHEREAS, The official recognition of the famine by the
27government of Ukraine and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine
28represents a significant step in the reestablishment of Ukraine’s
29national identity and the advancement of efforts to establish a
30democratic and free Ukraine that is fully integrated into the
31Western community of nations; and

end insert
begin insert

32
WHEREAS, Whether Ukrainian immigrants were fleeing
33political oppression or religious persecution to pursue better lives
34for themselves and their families, the desire to live in peace and
35enjoy liberty was so valued that it drew generations of Ukrainian
36immigrants to the United States and California in an effort to
37rebuild their lives; and

end insert
begin insert

38
WHEREAS, California is now home to the third largest
39Ukrainian-American population in the United States, and
40Ukrainians living in California have enriched our state through
P3    1their leadership and contributions in business, agriculture,
2academia, government, and the arts; and

end insert
begin insert

3
WHEREAS, In August 2015, a memorial to the millions who
4perished in the Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933, known as
5“Holodomor,” was erected in the United States capital, and the
6dedication ceremony took place on November 7, 2015; now,
7therefore, be it

end insert
begin insert

8
Resolved by the Assembly of the State of
9California, the Senate thereof concurring,
That
10the millions of victims of the man-made Ukrainian Famine of
111932-1933, known as “Holodomor,” and their descendants living
12throughout California should be solemnly remembered and
13honored; and be it further

end insert
begin insert

14
Resolved,
That the Legislature designates November 26,
152016, as Holodomor Remembrance Day in California and
16encourages individual citizens, educators, businesses, groups,
17organizations, and public institutions to observe Holodomor
18Remembrance Day with appropriate activities designed to honor
19the victims and educate Californians about this tragedy; and be
20it further

end insert
begin insert

21
Resolved,
That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit
22copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.

end insert
begin delete

23WHEREAS, Article IV of the California Constitution provides
24that it is the responsibility of the Legislature to oversee the
25operations of the executive branch and its various agencies and
26departments; and

end delete
begin delete

27WHEREAS, Article IV further provides that it is the
28responsibility of the Legislature to develop a budget for the State
29of California; and

end delete
begin delete

30WHEREAS, A zero-based budgeting approach is one in which
31agency and department budgets are evaluated on program-level
32efficiencies, instead of only marginal changes; and

end delete
begin delete

33WHEREAS, In recent years, the National Conference of State
34Legislatures has reported that 17 states have used zero-based
35budgeting in some form and several more have made serious efforts
36to do so; and

end delete
begin delete

37WHEREAS, The National Conference of State Legislatures
38indicates that states such as Idaho have successfully used
39zero-based budgeting as a management tool as well as a budgetary
40tool; and

end delete
begin delete

P4    1WHEREAS, The State of Washington, among others,
2successfully used a variant of zero-based budgeting starting in
32002 to align expenditures with desired outcomes and balanced
4the budget of the State of Washington without tax increases; and

end delete
begin delete

5WHEREAS, The elected representatives of the Legislature have
6a duty to guard taxpayer dollars against waste, fraud, and abuse;
7and

end delete
begin delete

8WHEREAS, The largest 40 state agency and department budgets
9account for more than one-half of the total budget for the State of
10California; and

end delete
begin delete

11WHEREAS, The largest 40 state agency and department budgets
12include all entities expending more than $100 million in state
13funds; now, therefore, be it

end delete
begin delete

14Resolved by The Assembly of The State of California, The Senate
15thereof concurring,
That the Legislature intends to conduct an
16in-depth review, over a period of 5 years, of the 40 largest budgets
17of state agencies and departments with state positions; and be it
18further

end delete
begin delete

19Resolved, That the Legislature intends to use a zero-based
20budgeting approach during this review; and be it further

end delete
begin delete

21Resolved, That the 40 largest budgets of state agencies and
22departments with state positions will be identified by the
23Legislature on or before June 30, 2015, based on amounts allocated
24to these agencies in the 2014-15 budget; and be it further

end delete
begin delete

25Resolved, That the Legislature will choose the first eight
26agencies and departments for review before the 2015 Interim Study
27Recess; and be it further

end delete
begin delete

28Resolved, That those eight agencies and departments are
29requested, before June 30, 2016, to provide to the Assembly
30Committee on Budget and the Senate Committee on Budget and
31Fiscal Review a complete list of logical “decision units” within
32an agency’s budget, which are programs, activities, or
33organizational entities. For each of these units, the agencies and
34departments are requested to provide all of the following:

35(a) A proposed minimum level of funding for viability for the
362017-18 fiscal year.

37(b) Current expenditures.

38(c) Program goals that can be quantified, including any goals
39that are required by citations of existing law.

40(d) Progress toward those goals; and be it further

end delete
begin delete

P5    1Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
2of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.

end delete


O

    98