Amended in Assembly June 8, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Joint Resolution No. 16

Introduced by Assembly Members Eduardo Garcia, Bloom, and Low

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Atkins, Chiu, Eggman, and Cristina Garcia)

May 13, 2015

Assembly Joint Resolution No. 16—Relative to blood donations.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 16, as amended, Eduardo Garcia. Blood donations.

This measure would call upon the President of the United States to encourage the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to adopt policies to repeal the current and upcoming discriminatory donor suitability policies of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding blood donations by men who have had sex with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to develop science-based policies such as criteria based on risky begin delete sexual end delete behavior in lieu of sexual orientation.

Fiscal committee: no.

WHEREAS, Since 1983, the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), an agency under the United States
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has prohibited
the donation of blood by any man who has had sex with another
man (MSM) at any time since 1977; and

WHEREAS, In December 2014, based on recommendations
from the HHS Advisory Committee on Blood and Tissue Safety
and Availability, the FDA announced its intent to promulgate
regulations to allow an MSM to donate blood only if he has not
been sexually active for the past 12 months. begin delete The HHS should be
commended for this initial step towards equality, but a double
standard still exists by treating gay and bisexual men differently
from heterosexual men; end delete begin insert Despite these recent steps toward a policy
change, a double standard would still exist under the policy as it
is proposed to be revised because it would still treat gay and
bisexual men differently from heterosexual men; end insert and

WHEREAS, California law prohibits discrimination against
individuals on the basis of actual or perceived sex, sexual
orientation, gender identity, and gender-related appearance and
behavior; and

WHEREAS, begin delete France, end delete Spain, Italy, Russia, Mexico, and Portugal
have adopted blood donor policies that measure risk against a set
of behaviors, sexual and otherwise, rather than the sex of a person’s
sexual partner or partners; and

WHEREAS, The FDA does not allow gay and bisexual men in
committed relationships to donate blood because, while one partner
may be monogamous, that individual cannot guarantee that the
other partner is monogamous. The FDA does not apply this same
logic to heterosexual relationships, which in effect discriminates
against gay and bisexual men; and

WHEREAS, A 12-month deferral policy for gay and bisexual
men to donate blood is overly stringent given the scientific
evidence, advanced testing methods, and the safety and quality
control measures in place within the different FDA-qualified blood
donating centers. The technology can identify within 7 to 10 days
with 99.9 percent accuracy whether or not a blood sample is
HIV-positive, and the chance of the blood test being inaccurate
within the 10-day window is about 1 in 2,000,000; and

WHEREAS, The General Social Survey conducted by NORC
at the University of Chicago estimates that 8.5 percent of men in
the United States have had at least one male sexual partner since
18 years of age, 4.1 percent of men report at least one male sex
partner in the last 5 years, and 3.8 percent report a male sex partner
in the last 12 months; and

WHEREAS, An estimated 45.4 percent of men (54 million) in
the United States are eligible to donate blood, but only 8.7 percent
of eligible men actually do. There are 15.7 million donations of
blood per year made by 9.2 million donors, yielding approximately
1.7 donations per donor; and

WHEREAS, The Williams Institute of the University of
California at Los Angeles School of Law estimates that, based on
the population of eligible and likely donors among the MSM
community, lifting the federal lifetime deferral policy on blood
donation by an MSM would result in 4.2 million newly eligible
male donors, of which 360,600 would likely donate, generating
615,300 additional pints of blood. Applying national estimates to
the California population, the Institute further estimates that lifting
the ban on MSM blood donations would add an additional 510,000
eligible men to the current blood donor pool, of which 43,917
would likely donate, resulting in an additional 74,945 donated
pints in California; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
California, jointly, That the California State Legislature calls upon
the President of the United States to encourage the Secretary of
the United States Department of Health and Human Services to
adopt policies to repeal the current and upcoming discriminatory
donor suitability policies of the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) regarding blood donations by men who
have had sex with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to
develop science-based policies such as criteria based on risky
begin delete sexual end delete behavior in lieu of sexual orientation; and be it further

Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
States, to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health
and Human Services, to the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each
Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the
United States.