Amended in Assembly June 25, 2015

Amended in Assembly June 8, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 16


Introduced by Assembly Members Eduardo Garcia, Bloom, and Low

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Atkins, Chiu, Eggman,begin delete and Cristina Garciaend deletebegin insert Cristina Garcia, Achadjian, Alejo, Baker, Bonilla, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Daly, Dodd, Frazier, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lopez, Maienschein, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, O’Donnell, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Santiago, Mark end insertbegin insertStone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Wilk, Williams, and Woodend insert)

May 13, 2015


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 16—Relative to blood donations.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 16, as amended, Eduardo Garcia. Blood donations.

This measure would call upon the President of the United States to encourage the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services to adopt policies to repeal the current and upcoming discriminatory donor suitability policies of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding blood donations by men who have had sex with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to develop science-based policies such as criteria based on risky behavior in lieu of sexual orientation.

Fiscal committee: no.

P2    1WHEREAS, Since 1983, the United States Food and Drug
2Administration (FDA), an agency under the United States
3Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has prohibited
4the donation of blood by any man who has had sex with another
5man (MSM) at any time since 1977; and

6WHEREAS, In December 2014, based on recommendations
7from the HHS Advisory Committee on Blood and Tissue Safety
8and Availability, the FDA announced its intent to promulgate
9regulations to allow an MSM to donate blood only if he has not
10been sexually active for the past 12 months. Despite these recent
11steps toward a policy change, a double standard would still exist
12under the policy as it is proposed to be revised because it would
13still treat gay and bisexual men differently from heterosexual men;
14and

15WHEREAS, California law prohibits discrimination against
16individuals on the basis of actual or perceived sex, sexual
17orientation, gender identity, and gender-related appearance and
18behavior; and

19WHEREAS, Spain, Italy, Russia, Mexico, and Portugal have
20adopted blood donor policies that measure risk against a set of
21behaviors, sexual and otherwise, rather than the sex of a person’s
22sexual partner or partners; and

23WHEREAS, The FDA does not allow gay and bisexual men in
24committed relationships to donate blood because, while one partner
25may be monogamous, that individual cannot guarantee that the
26other partner is monogamous. The FDA does not apply this same
27logic to heterosexual relationships, which in effect discriminates
28against gay and bisexual men; and

29WHEREAS, A 12-month deferral policy for gay and bisexual
30men to donate blood is overly stringent given the scientific
31evidence, advanced testing methods, and the safety and quality
32control measures in place within the different FDA-qualified blood
33donating centers. The technology can identify within 7 to 10 days
34with 99.9 percent accuracy whether or not a blood sample is
35HIV-positive, and the chance of the blood test being inaccurate
36within the 10-day window is about 1 in 2,000,000; and

37WHEREAS, The General Social Survey conducted by NORC
38at the University of Chicago estimates that 8.5 percent of men in
P3    1the United States have had at least one male sexual partner since
218 years of age, 4.1 percent of men report at least one male sex
3partner in the last 5 years, and 3.8 percent report a male sex partner
4in the last 12 months; and

5WHEREAS, An estimated 45.4 percent of men (54 million) in
6the United States are eligible to donate blood, but only 8.7 percent
7of eligible men actually do. There are 15.7 million donations of
8blood per year made by 9.2 million donors, yielding approximately
91.7 donations per donor; and

10WHEREAS, The Williams Institute of the University of
11California at Los Angeles School of Law estimates that, based on
12the population of eligible and likely donors among the MSM
13community, lifting the federal lifetime deferral policy on blood
14donation by an MSM would result in 4.2 million newly eligible
15male donors, of which 360,600 would likely donate, generating
16615,300 additional pints of blood. Applying national estimates to
17the California population, the Institute further estimates that lifting
18the ban on MSM blood donations would add an additional 510,000
19eligible men to the current blood donor pool, of which 43,917
20would likely donate, resulting in an additional 74,945 donated
21pints in California; now, therefore, be it

22Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
23California, jointly,
That the California State Legislature calls upon
24the President of the United States to encourage the Secretary of
25the United States Department of Health and Human Services to
26adopt policies to repeal the current and upcoming discriminatory
27donor suitability policies of the United States Food and Drug
28Administration (FDA) regarding blood donations by men who
29have had sex with another man and, instead, direct the FDA to
30develop science-based policies such as criteria based on risky
31behavior in lieu of sexual orientation; and be it further

32Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
33of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
34States, to the Secretary of the United States Department of Health
35and Human Services, to the Speaker of the House of
36Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each
37Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the
38United States.



O

    97