Amended in Assembly March 28, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 28


Introduced by Assembly Member Obernolte

begin insert

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Chu)

end insert

January 26, 2016


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 28—Relative to daylight saving time.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 28, as amended, Obernolte. Daylight saving time.

This measure would memorialize the Congress and the President to enact legislation that would allow a state to adopt daylight saving time year round.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, The State of California is committed to attaining
250 percent of its energy generation from renewable sources and
3to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below
4its 1990 level by 2030; and

5WHEREAS, It is the responsibility of the state to employ any
6and all means of energy reduction that will reduce reliance and
7pressure on energy infrastructure in the state; and

8WHEREAS, Daylight saving time was a widely used 20th
9century energy reduction tool that can be expanded to meet 21st
10century energy shortages; and

begin delete

11WHEREAS, A 2008 federal Department of Energy report
12concluded that extended daylight saving time saves the United
13States approximately 0.5 percent energy each day that it is used,
14and;

end delete

P2    1WHEREAS, A report by the State Energy Resources
2Conservation and Development Commission, issued in May 2001,
3and titled “Effects of Daylight Saving Time on California
4Electricity Use,” indicates that winter daylight saving time, as that
5term is defined in the report, would likely reduce electricity use
6by 3,400 megawatt hours per day and that summer double daylight
7saving time, as that term is defined in the report, would likely
8reduce electricity use by 1,500 megawatt hours per day, producing
9a cost savings of $300,000,000 to $1,025,000,000 per year for
10California ratepayers; and

11WHEREAS, A 2004 study from Rutgers University titled “The
12Effects of Daylight and Daylight Saving Time on United States
13Pedestrian Fatalities and Motor Vehicle Occupant Fatalities” found
14that year-round daylight saving time would reduce pedestrian
15fatalities by 171 or 13 percent of all pedestrian fatalities per year
16in the 5 to 10 a.m. and 4 to 9 p.m. time periods and reduce motor
17vehicle occupants fatalities by 195 or 3 percent per year in the
18same time period; and

19WHEREAS, A 2015 study in The Review of Economics and
20Statistics titled “Under the Cover of Darkness: How Ambient Light
21Influences Criminal Activity” estimated a 7 percent decrease in
22robberies following the shift to daylight saving time; and

23WHEREAS, Scientists have connected a number of health
24consequences with the act of switching between standard time and
25daylight saving time, including greater risks of heart attacks, more
26frequent traffic accidents and workplace injuries, and increased
27suicide rates in the days immediately after the switch; and

28WHEREAS, The citizens of California are being asked to make
29major changes in their personal and professional lives to conserve
30energy and would be grateful to receive the benefits of year-round
31daylight saving time in return; and

32WHEREAS, Although neither standard time nor daylight saving
33time produces much energy reduction for the coldest states during
34the more frigid months of the year, California enjoys a temperate
35climate that would afford greater reductions in energy use by
36utilizing a year-round daylight saving time plan; and

37WHEREAS, The federal Uniform Time Act of 1966 allows
38states to decline application of daylight saving time and provides
39states with the option of practicing standard time year round, but
P3    1does not allow states to practice daylight saving time year round;
2and

3WHEREAS, By applying daylight saving time uniformly, the
4state could avoid any inconsistencies in time application that would
5otherwise impact and confuse the broadcasting, rail, airline, and
6motor coach industries; and

7WHEREAS, In House of Representatives Report No. 99-185
8from the Committee on Energy and Commerce, numerous benefits
9are listed in support of the extension of daylight saving time,
10including significant energy conservation, improved traffic safety,
11reduction in crime, economic growth, and overwhelming public
12support; and

13WHEREAS, The state would greatly benefit from having the
14option of extending daylight saving time year round; now,
15therefore, be it

16Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
17California, jointly,
That the Legislature of the State of California
18respectfully memorializes the United States Congress and the
19President of the United States to enact legislation that would allow
20a state to adopt daylight saving time year round; and be it further

21Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
22of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
23States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and to each
24Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the
25United States.



O

    98