AJR 32, as amended, Alejo. United States Supreme Court: nominations.
This measure would urge the United States Senate to fairly consider the nomination for Justice to the United States Supreme Court submitted by President Obama and to vote up or down on the nomination.
Fiscal committee: no.
P1 1WHEREAS, The Supreme Court of the United States is the
2highest court in the nation and considers important national
3questions whose determination is necessary for the orderly
4operation of the federal government and the government of the
5several states; and
6WHEREAS, Having an even number of justices on the Supreme
7Court of the United States makes it possible to have numerical ties
8in controversial decisions before the Court, which could leave
9unresolved conflicts of law between the several Circuit Courts of
10Appeal across thebegin delete Nation;end deletebegin insert nation;end insert and
11WHEREAS, A failure to ensure conformity of federal and state
12law across the severalbegin delete states,end deletebegin insert states would severely compromiseend insert
P2 1 the fundamental constitutional principles of due process and equal
2protection under thebegin delete law will be severely compromised;end deletebegin insert law;end insert and
3WHEREAS, Section 2 of Article II of the United States
4Constitution provides the President of the United States with the
5power to nominate justices to the Supreme Court of the United
6States with the advice and consent of the United States Senate;
7and
8WHEREAS, Barack Obama was duly reelected as President of
9the United States on November 6, 2012, with 332 electoral votes
10and nearly 5 million more votes than his opponent, and retains the
11full powers and privileges of that office until his term ends on
12January 20, 2017; and
13WHEREAS, By reelecting Barack Obama as President of the
14United States, the American people have already voiced their
15affirmation that he is their choice to exercise the powers of the
16Presidency, including filling vacancies on the Supreme Court of
17the United States that arise during his term in office; and
18WHEREAS, There is historical precedence for confirming
19nominees for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
20during the final year of a president’s term, including Justice
21Anthony Kennedy of California by President Ronald Reagan in
221988; Justice Frank Murphy of Michigan by President Franklin
23D. Roosevelt in 1940; and Justice Louis Brandeis of Kentucky by
24President Woodrow Wilson in 1916;begin delete now, therefore, be itend deletebegin insert andend insert
25WHEREAS, The United States Senate has a duty afforded by
26Section 2 of Article II of the United States Constitution to provide
27the President of the United States with their advice and consent
28to nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States made
29by the President, and refusing to even give due consideration to
30a presidential nomination would be a dereliction of the Senate’s
31constitutional duties; now, therefore, be it
32Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
33California, jointly, That the Legislature urges the United States
34Senate to give whomever President Obama nominates to the
35Supreme Court of the United States fair and honest consideration
36through an up or down vote, both on the Senate Judiciary
37Committee and on the floor of the United States Senate; and be it
38further
39Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
40of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
P3 1States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
2Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, to the Majority
3Leader of the Senate, to the Minority Leader of the Senate, and to
4each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress
5of the United States.
O
98