California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 40


Introduced by Assembly Members Nazarian and Levine

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alejo, Atkins, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dodd, Eggman, Cristina Garcia, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gray, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Lopez, Low, Medina, Mullin, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Ting, Weber, and Wood)

(Coauthor: Senator Allen)

May 19, 2016


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 40—Relative to the United States-Mexico border.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 40, as introduced, Nazarian. United States-Mexico border.

The measure would urge the Members of Congress to work to recognize Mexican American families’ needs to visit family members in Mexico and increase commerce between our nations by reducing border delays through a more open border and to speak out against and to reject efforts to build a wall along the United States-Mexico border.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, California and Mexico share more than 130 miles
2of an international border that is 1,954 miles long. The border
3region is home to tremendous cultural history and economic
4commerce between the United States and Mexico; and

P2    1WHEREAS, In California, 12 million (32 percent) of the 38
2million residents are of Mexican descent. California has one of
3the highest concentrations of Spanish speakers in the United States.
4In Southern California, between Los Angeles and the Mexican
5border, 40 percent of the population speaks Spanish. If the City of
6Los Angeles were in Mexico, its five million Mexican residents
7would make it the fourth largest city in Mexico (after Mexico City,
8Guadalajara, and Monterrey). Mexican Americans frequently find
9it challenging to travel back and forth between Mexico and
10California, thereby making family visits to Mexico difficult; and

11WHEREAS, Achievements by Latinos in America and
12California include contributions to all facets of our community;
13and

14WHEREAS, Latino voters continue to go to the polls in record
15numbers and influence the entrance of newly elected Latino public
16officials in both the Democratic and Republican parties and
17influence issues that encompass providing affordable housing,
18investing in our children, ensuring that higher education is
19affordable and accessible, creating good paying jobs for working
20families, and improving the overall quality of life for all
21Californians; and

22WHEREAS, California’s Latinos have contributed to the state’s
23culture and society through their many achievements in music,
24food, dance, poetry, literature, architecture, entertainment, sports,
25and a broad spectrum of artistic expression; and

26WHEREAS, Latinos in California have challenged the frontiers
27of social and economic justice, thereby improving the working
28conditions and lives of countless Californians; and

29WHEREAS, Mexico has the largest network of free trade
30agreements in the world, with a total of 12 free trade agreements
31involving 44 countries, on three different continents. United States
32trade with Mexico and Canada has more than tripled since 1994.
33United States exports to Mexico increased from $54.8 billion in
341994 to $226.2 billion in 2013. Imports from Mexico increased
35from $51.6 billion in 1994 to $280.5 billion in 2013. Mexico’s
36economy has increasingly become oriented toward manufacturing.
37The United States has free trade agreements in force with 20
38markets around the world, including Mexico. In 2014, 47 percent
39($765.2 billion) of United States goods were exported to free trade
40agreement countries; and

P3    1WHEREAS, In 2014, California exported $174.1 billion to 229
2foreign economies and accounted for 10.7 percent of total United
3States exports. In 2015, California’s largest export market was
4Mexico, which purchased $26.8 billion (17.4 percent) of all the
5states exports in 2015; and

6WHEREAS, Approximately 177,000 California jobs (17 percent
7of all export-supported jobs in California) are related to the
8commercial relationship with Mexico. Commerce, tourism, and
9foreign direct investment from Mexico support more than 200,000
10jobs in California (1.5 percent of the total number of payroll jobs
11in California); and

12WHEREAS, Border crossing delays at the United States-Mexico
13border accounted for an estimated output loss of $3.9 billion and
14a 30,000 national job loss due to reduced output in 2008. In
15California, losses were estimated at $3.2 billion and a 25,000 job
16loss. Research shows that if border delays continue to grow,
17economic losses will continue to increase significantly by 2017
18and could cost the United States economy nearly 54,000 jobs and
19$12 billion in output annually resulting in an estimated cumulative
20loss of $86 billion. California’s cumulative economic loss in output
21due to in-state border delays over the next 10 years is estimated
22to be $4.5 billion; and

23WHEREAS, Some American political figures have proposed
24or publicly supported building a wall between the United States
25and Mexico. Using precast cement wall panels, it is estimated that
26it would take four years, 339 million cubic feet of concrete and 5
27billion pounds of reinforced steel to build the wall at a cost of
28approximately $10.6 billion; now, therefore, be it

29Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
30California, jointly,
That the Legislature respectfully requests that
31the Members of Congress work to recognize Mexican American
32families’ needs to visit family members in Mexico and increase
33commerce between our nations by reducing border delays through
34a more open border and to speak out against and to reject efforts
35to build a wall along the United States-Mexico border; and be it
36further

37Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
38of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.



O

    99