AJR 9, as amended, Chang. Patent reform.
This measure would urge the President and the Congress of the United States to craft a balanced and workable approach to reduce incentives for and minimize unnecessary patent litigation while ensuring that legitimate patent enforcement rights are protected and maintained.
Fiscal committee: no.
P2    1WHEREAS, The principle of intellectual property is enshrined 
2in the United States Constitution, specifically under clause 8 of 
3Section 8 of Article I of the United States Constitution, which 
4empowers Congress to “promote the Progress of Science and useful 
5Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the 
6exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries”; and
7WHEREAS, A robust patent system is critical to promote 
8economic growth and innovation and ensure just compensation 
9for the labor and proliferation of beneficial ideas and innovations; 
10and
11WHEREAS, California accounts for 25 percent of the nation’s 
12patents; and
13WHEREAS, The state recognizes and respects the importance 
14of patent protections and patent enforcement rights to driving 
15continued research, investment, technological innovation, and job 
16creation across multiple sectors of our economy; and 
17WHEREAS, Small businesses depend on patents to secure 
18investments, and firms with fewer than 25 employees hold nearly 
19one-quarter of United States-held patents in innovative emerging 
20technologies; and 
21WHEREAS, Enforcement of legitimate patent rights is essential 
22to promoting an innovation environment that fuels economic 
23growth; and 
24WHEREAS, There is increasing concern about litigation by 
25predatory Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), which are built on a 
26rent-seeking business model that exploits the patent legal system 
27for financial gain without producing or manufacturing anything 
28of value for society; and
29WHEREAS, Many PAEs attain ambiguous patents with the sole 
30intent of filing patent infringement lawsuits. PAEs assert these 
31patents against businesses of all sizes and in all industries, often 
32years after the product has become standard and widely used; and
33WHEREAS, PAEs rarely earn successful judgments in court, 
34underscoring the questionable merits of these particular patent 
35cases. However, given the high cost and risks associated with 
36patent litigation, most defendants choose to settle in order to avoid 
37further financial loss. Indeed, many PAEs will offer royalty 
38settlements below market value in order to encourage settlement 
39and avoid trial; and
P3    1WHEREAS, Predatory PAEs have a detrimental impact on the 
2economy and innovation. PAE activities cost businesses $29 billion 
3directly, mostly borne by small- and medium-sized businesses; 
4and
5WHEREAS, The growth of patent litigation is directly tied to 
6aggressive PAEs in recent years. In 2010, PAEs were responsible 
7for 29 percent of patent litigation, and by 2012 PAEs represented 
862 percent of all patent suits; and
9WHEREAS, The California economy is especially vulnerable 
10to lawsuits directed at information technology patents; and
11WHEREAS, Federal legislation is necessary to prevent and 
12deter abusive patent litigation; now, therefore, be it
13Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of 
14California, jointly, That the Legislature urges the President and 
15the Congress of the United States to craft a balanced and workable 
16approach to reduce incentives for and minimize unnecessary patent 
17litigation while ensuring that legitimate patent enforcement rights 
18are protected and maintained; and be it further
19Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies 
20of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United 
21States, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of 
22Representatives, the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the 
23Senate, and each member of the California delegation to the United 
24States Congress.
O
97