AB 54, as amended, Olsen. Public accommodations: construction-related accessibility claims.
Existing law allows a plaintiff to collect statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation only if the plaintiff was denied full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion, as specified. Existing law imposes a $1,000 limit on statutory damages when a defendant demonstrates that the defendant has, among other things, cured the construction-related accessibility violation within 60 days of being served with a complaint. Existing law requires a demand letter alleging a construction-related accessibility claim to, among other things, state facts sufficient to allow a reasonable person to identify the basis of the claim.
This bill would, when a plaintiff brings a claim alleging a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard within 3 years of a change in that standard, allow a plaintiff to collect statutory damages only if the plaintiff also provides the owner, agent, or other party responsible for the place in violation with a written notice or demand letter at least 60 days prior to filing any action and the violation is not cured. The bill would require the written notice or demand letter to contain specified information.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 55.56 of the Civil Code is amended to
2read:
(a) Statutory damages under either subdivision (a) of
4Section 52 or subdivision (a) of Section 54.3 may be recovered in
5a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public
6accommodation only if a violation or violations of one or more
7construction-related accessibility standards denied the plaintiff
8full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a
9particular occasion, and the requirements of Section 55.565 have
10been met, if applicable.
11(b) A plaintiff is denied full and equal access only if the plaintiff
12personally encountered the violation on a particular occasion, or
13the plaintiff was deterred from accessing a place of public
14accommodation on a particular
occasion.
15(c) A violation personally encountered by a plaintiff may be
16sufficient to cause a denial of full and equal access if the plaintiff
17experienced difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment because of
18the violation.
19(d) A plaintiff demonstrates that he or she was deterred from
20accessing a place of public accommodation on a particular occasion
21only if both of the following apply:
22(1) The plaintiff had actual knowledge of a violation or
23violations that prevented or reasonably dissuaded the plaintiff from
24accessing a place of public accommodation that the plaintiff
25intended to use on a particular occasion.
P3 1(2) The violation or violations would have actually
denied the
2plaintiff full and equal access if the plaintiff had accessed the place
3of public accommodation on that particular occasion.
4(e) Statutory damages may be assessed pursuant to subdivision
5(a) based on each particular occasion that the plaintiff was denied
6full and equal access, and not upon the number of violations of
7construction-related accessibility standards identified at the place
8of public accommodation where the denial of full and equal access
9occurred. If the place of public accommodation consists of distinct
10facilities that offer distinct services, statutory damages may be
11assessed based on each denial of full and equal access to the distinct
12facility, and not upon the number of violations of
13construction-related accessibility standards identified at the place
14of public accommodation where the denial of full and equal access
15occurred.
16(f) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a defendant’s liability
17for statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim
18against a place of public accommodation is reduced to a minimum
19of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each offense if the defendant
20demonstrates that it has corrected all construction-related violations
21that are the basis of a claim within 60 days of being served with
22the complaint, and the defendant demonstrates any of the following:
23(A) The structure or area of the alleged violation was determined
24to be “CASp-inspected” or “meets applicable standards” and, to
25the best of the defendant’s knowledge, there were no modifications
26or alterations that impacted compliance with construction-related
27accessibility standards with respect to the
plaintiff’s claim that
28were completed or commenced between the date of that
29determination and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff
30was allegedly denied full and equal access.
31(B) The structure or area of the alleged violation was the subject
32of an inspection report indicating “CASp determination pending”
33orbegin delete “Inspectedend deletebegin insert “inspectedend insert by a CASp,” and the defendant has either
34implemented reasonable measures to correct the alleged violation
35before the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly
36denied full and equal access, or the defendant was in the process
37of correcting the alleged violation within a reasonable time and
38manner before the particular
occasion on which the plaintiff was
39allegedly denied full and equal access.
P4 1(C) For a claim alleging a construction-related accessibility
2violation filed before January 1, 2018, the structure or area of the
3alleged violation was a new construction or an improvement that
4was approved by, and passed inspection by, the local building
5department permit and inspection process on or after January 1,
62008, and before January 1, 2016, and, to the best of the
7defendant’s knowledge, there were no modifications or alterations
8that impacted compliance with respect to the plaintiff’s claim that
9were completed or commenced between the completion date of
10the new construction or improvement and the particular occasion
11on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access.
12(D) The
structure or area of the alleged violation was new
13construction or an improvement that was approved by, and passed
14inspection by, a local building department official who is a certified
15access specialist, and, to the best of the defendant’s knowledge,
16there were no modifications or alterations that affected compliance
17with respect to the plaintiff’s claim that were completed or
18commenced between the completion date of the new construction
19or improvement and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff
20was allegedly denied full and equal access.
21(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a defendant’s liability for
22statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim
23against a place of public accommodation is reduced to a minimum
24of two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each offense if the defendant
25demonstrates both of the following:
26(A) The defendant has corrected all construction-related
27violations that are the basis of a claim within 30 days of being
28served with the complaint.
29(B) The defendant is a small business that has employed 25 or
30fewer employees on average over the past three years, or for the
31years it has been in existence if less than three years, as evidenced
32by wage report forms filed with the Economic Development
33Department, and has average annual gross receipts of less than
34three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000) over the
35previous three years, or for the years it has been in existence if
36less than three years, as evidenced by federal or state income tax
37returns. The average annual gross receipts dollar amount shall be
38adjusted biannually by the Department of General Services
for
39changes in the California Consumer Price Index for All Urban
40Consumers, as compiled by the Department of Industrial Relations.
P5 1The Department of General Services shall post that adjusted
2amount on its Internet Web site.
3(3) This subdivision shall not be applicable to intentional
4violations.
5(4) Nothing in this subdivision affects the awarding of actual
6damages, or affects the awarding of treble actual damages.
7(5) This subdivision shall apply only to claims filed on or after
8the effective date of Senate Bill 1186 of the 2011-12 Regular
9Session of the Legislature. Nothing in this subdivision is intended
10to affect a complaint filed before that date.
11(g) This section does not alter the applicable law for the
12awarding of injunctive or other equitable relief for a violation or
13violations of one or more construction-related accessibility
14standards, nor alter any legal obligation of a party to mitigate
15damages.
16(h) In assessing liability under subdivision (d), in an action
17alleging multiple claims for the same construction-related
18accessibility violation on different particular occasions, the court
19shall consider the reasonableness of the plaintiff’s conduct in light
20of the plaintiff’s obligation, if any, to mitigate damages.
Section 55.565 is added to the Civil Code, to read:
(a) When a plaintiff brings a construction-related
23accessibility claim alleging a violation of a construction-related
24accessibility standard within three years of a change in that
25standard, statutory damages under subdivision (a) of Section 52
26or subdivision (a) of Section 54.3 may be recovered against a place
27of public accommodation only if the plaintiff provides the owner,
28agent, or other party responsible for the place of public
29accommodation where the alleged violation occurred with
30sufficient written notice of the allegations and alleged access
31barriers on which the claim is based at least 60 days prior to the
32filing of any action and the alleged access barriers are not removed.
33(b) A written notice is sufficient for the purposes of subdivision
34(a) if either of the following conditions is met:
35(1) The notice states facts sufficient to allow a reasonable person
36to identify the basis of the construction-related accessibility claim
37under subdivision (a) of Section 55.31 and states that the recipient
38may be civilly liable for actual and statutory damages for a
39violation of a construction-related accessibility requirement if the
P6 1access barriers that constitute the basis of the construction-related
2accessibility claim are not removed within 60 days.
3(2) The notice is a written demand letter that offers prelitigation
4settlement negotiations in accordance with subdivision (b) of
5Section 55.31.
6(c) For the purposes of this section, “construction-related
7accessibility claim,” “construction-related accessibility standard,”
8and “place of public accommodation” have the meanings set forth
9in Section 55.52.
O
98