AB 54,
as amended, Olsen. Public accommodations: construction-related accessibilitybegin delete claims.end deletebegin insert standards: tax credit.end insert
Existing
end deletebegin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertExistingend insert law allows a plaintiff to collect statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation only if the plaintiff was denied full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion, as specified. Existing law imposes a $1,000 limit on statutory damages when a defendant demonstrates that the defendant has, among other things, cured the construction-related accessibility violation within 60 days of being served with a complaint. Existing law requires a demand letter alleging a construction-related accessibility claim to, among other things, state facts sufficient to allow a reasonable person to identify the basis of the claim.
This bill would, when a plaintiff brings a claim alleging a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard within 3 years of a change in that standard, allow a plaintiff to collect statutory damages only if the plaintiff also provides the owner, agent, or other party responsible for the place in violation with a written notice or demand letter at least 60 days prior to filing any action and the violation is not cured. The bill would require the written notice or demand letter to contain specified information.
begin insert(2) Existing law grants an owner or tenant of a site, defined as a place of public accommodation, that has been inspected by a certified access specialist (CASp) and determined to meet all applicable construction-related accessibility standards specified rights in an action that includes a construction-related accessibility claim.
end insertbegin insertThe Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in specified conformity to federal law, allow a credit against the taxes imposed by those laws, to eligible small businesses for 50% of eligible access expenditures, which are defined as those amounts paid or incurred by the taxpayer to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, as provided, not to exceed $250.
end insertbegin insertThis bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016, would include as an eligible access expenditure any amount paid or incurred by a taxpayer to receive an inspection by a CASp.
end insertVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertThe Legislature finds and declares that the
2federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a
3well-intentioned law empowering private citizens to bring claims
4against businesses that do not make their establishments accessible
5to those with disabilities. However, because the ADA authorizes
6damages of up to $4,000end insertbegin insert on top of legal fees, California is a hotbed
P3 1for predatory, serial litigants seeking to win settlements from
2businesses out of compliance with the ADA.end insert
3(b) The Legislature further finds and declares all of the
4following:
5(1) Current law permits defendants to request a court stay and
6an early evaluation conference upon being served with a
7construction-related accessibility claim if, among other things,
8the site in question had new construction approved by a local
9public building department inspector who is a certified access
10specialist (CASp), no subsequent modifications or alterations have
11been made, and all violations are corrected within 60 days.
12(2) The purpose of this tax credit is to promote increased
13compliance with disabled accessibility building codes throughout
14the state by encouraging business and property owners to become
15CASp certified. Using the relief provided by this tax credit, business
16and property owners will be more likely to obtain a CASp
17inspection
whenever modifying or altering a site.
18(c) The California Commission on Disability Access shall
19include in its annual report to the Legislature the impact the tax
20credit has had on reducing ADA compliance lawsuits.
begin insertSection 55.53 of the end insertbegin insertCivil Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to read:end insert
(a) For purposes of this part, a certified access specialist
23shall, upon completion of the inspection of a site, comply with the
24following:
25(1) For a meets applicable standards site, if the CASp determines
26the site meets all applicable construction-related accessibility
27standards, the CASp shall provide a written inspection report to
28the requesting party that includes both of the following:
29(A) An identification and description of the inspected structures
30and areas of the site.
31(B) A signed and dated statement that includes both of the
32following:
33(i) A statement that, in
the opinion of the CASp, the inspected
34structures and areas of the site meet construction-related
35accessibility standards. The statement shall clearly indicate whether
36the determination of the CASp includes an assessment of readily
37achievable barrier removal.
38(ii) If corrections were made as a result of the CASp inspection,
39an itemized list of all corrections and dates of completion.
P4 1(2) For an inspected by a CASp site, if the CASp determines
2that corrections are needed to the site in order for the site to meet
3all applicable construction-related accessibility standards, the
4CASp shall provide a signed and dated written inspection report
5to the requesting party that includes all of the following:
6(A) An identification and description of the inspected structures
7and areas of the site.
8(B) A statement that, in the opinion of the CASp, the inspected
9structures and areas of the site need correction to meet
10construction-related accessibility standards. This statement shall
11clearly indicate whether the determination of the CASp includes
12an assessment of readily achievable barrier removal.
13(C) An identification and description of the structures or areas
14of the site that need correction and the correction needed.
15(D) A schedule of completion for each of the corrections within
16a reasonable timeframe.
17(b) For purposes of this section, in determining whether the site
18meets applicable construction-related accessibility standards when
19there is a conflict or difference between a state and federal
20provision, standard, or regulation, the state
provision, standard, or
21regulation shall apply unless the federal provision, standard, or
22regulation is more protective of accessibility rights.
23(c) Every CASp who conducts an inspection of a place of public
24accommodation shall, upon completing the inspection of the site,
25provide the building owner or tenant who requested the inspection
26with the following notice, which the State Architect shall make
27available as a form on the State Architect’s Internet Web site:
31YOU ARE ADVISED TO KEEP IN YOUR RECORDS ANY
32WRITTEN INSPECTION REPORT AND ANY OTHER
33DOCUMENTATION CONCERNING YOUR PROPERTY SITE
34THAT IS GIVEN TO YOU BY A CERTIFIED ACCESS
35SPECIALIST.
36IF YOU BECOME A DEFENDANT IN A LAWSUIT THAT
37INCLUDES A CLAIM CONCERNING A SITE INSPECTED
38BY A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST, YOU
MAY BE
39ENTITLED TO A COURT STAY (AN ORDER TEMPORARILY
P5 1STOPPING ANY LAWSUIT) OF THE CLAIM AND AN EARLY
2EVALUATION CONFERENCE.
3IN ORDER TO REQUEST THE STAY AND EARLY
4EVALUATION CONFERENCE, YOU WILL NEED TO VERIFY
5THAT A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST HAS INSPECTED
6THE SITE THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE CLAIM. YOU
7WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE COURT AND
8THE PLAINTIFF WITH THE COPY OF A WRITTEN
9INSPECTION REPORT BY THE CERTIFIED ACCESS
10SPECIALIST, AS SET FORTH IN CIVIL CODE SECTION
1155.54. THE APPLICATION FORM AND INFORMATION ON
12HOW TO REQUEST A STAY AND EARLY EVALUATION
13CONFERENCE MAY BE OBTAINED AT
14www.courts.ca.gov/selfhelp-start.htm.
15YOU ARE ENTITLED TO REQUEST, FROM A CERTIFIED
16ACCESS SPECIALIST WHO HAS CONDUCTED AN
17INSPECTION OF YOUR PROPERTY, A WRITTEN
18INSPECTION REPORT AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION AS
19SET FORTH IN CIVIL CODE SECTION 55.53. YOU ARE ALSO
20ENTITLED TO REQUEST THE ISSUANCE OF A DISABILITY
21ACCESS INSPECTION
CERTIFICATE, WHICH YOU MAY
22POST ON YOUR PROPERTY.
24(d) (1) Commencing July 1, 2010, a local agency shall employ
25or retain at least one building inspector who is a certified access
26specialist. The certified access specialist shall provide consultation
27to the local agency, permit applicants, and members of the public
28on compliance with state construction-related accessibility
29standards with respect to inspections of a place of public
30accommodation that relate to permitting, plan checks, or new
31construction, including, but not limited to, inspections relating to
32tenant improvements that may impact access. If a local agency
33employs or retains two or more certified access specialists to
34comply with this subdivision, at least one-half of the certified
35access specialists shall be building inspectors who are certified
36access specialists.
37(2) Commencing January 1, 2014, a local agency shall employ
38or retain a sufficient number of building inspectors who are
39certified access specialists to conduct permitting and plan check
40services to review for compliance with state construction-related
P6 1accessibility standards by a place of public accommodation with
2respect to new construction, including, but not limited to, projects
3relating to tenant improvements that may impact access. If a local
4agency employs or retains two or more certified access specialists
5to comply with this subdivision, at least one-half of the certified
6access specialists shall be building inspectors who are certified
7access specialists.
8(3) If a permit applicant or member of the public requests
9consultation from a certified access specialist, the local agency
10may charge an amount limited to a reasonable hourly rate, an
11estimate of which shall be provided upon request in advance of
12the consultation. A
local government may additionally charge or
13increase permitting, plan check, or inspection fees to the extent
14necessary to offset the costs of complying with this subdivision.
15Any revenues generated from an hourly or other charge or fee
16increase under this subdivision shall be used solely to offset the
17costs incurred to comply with this subdivision. A CASp inspection
18pursuant to subdivision (a) by a building inspector who is a
19certified access specialist shall be treated equally for legal and
20evidentiary purposes as an inspection conducted by a private CASp.
21Nothing in this subdivision shall preclude permit applicants or any
22other person with a legal interest in the property from retaining a
23private CASp at any time.
24(e) (1) Every CASp who completes an inspection of a place of
25public accommodation shall, upon a determination that the site
26meets applicable standards pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision
27(a) or is
inspected by a CASp pursuant to paragraph (2) of
28subdivision (a), provide the building owner or tenant requesting
29the inspection with a numbered disability access inspection
30certificate indicating that the site has undergone inspection by a
31certified access specialist. The disability access inspection
32certificate shall be dated and signed by the CASp inspector, and
33shall contain the inspector’s name and license number. Upon
34issuance of a certificate, the CASp shall record the issuance of the
35numbered certificate, the name and address of the recipient, and
36the type of report issued pursuant to subdivision (a) in a record
37book the CASp shall maintain for that purpose.
38(2) Beginning March 1, 2009, the State Architect shall make
39available for purchase by any local building department or CASp
40sequentially numbered disability access inspection certificates that
P7 1are printed with a watermark or other feature to deter forgery and
2that comply with the
information requirements specified in
3subdivision (a).
4(3) The disability access inspection certificate may be posted
5on the premises of the place of public accommodation, unless,
6following the date of inspection, the inspected site has been
7modified or construction has commenced to modify the inspected
8site in a way that may impact compliance with construction-related
9accessibility standards.
10(f) Nothing in this section or any other law is intended to require
11a property owner or tenant to hire a CASp. A property owner’s or
12tenant’s election not to hire a CASp shall not be admissible to
13prove that person’s lack of intent to comply with the law.
14(g) An owner or tenant of a site that a CASp has determined
15meets applicable standards may
be allowed for a tax credit, as
16described in Section 17053.43 or 23643 of the Revenue and
17Taxation Code, to offset a portion of the costs of obtaining the
18CASp inspection.
Section 55.56 of the Civil Code is amended to read:
(a) Statutory damages under either subdivision (a) of
22Section 52 or subdivision (a) of Section 54.3 may be recovered in
23a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public
24accommodation only if a violation or violations of one or more
25construction-related accessibility standards denied the plaintiff
26full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a
27particular occasion, and the requirements of Section 55.565 have
28been met, if applicable.
29(b) A plaintiff is denied full and equal access only if the plaintiff
30personally encountered the violation on a particular occasion, or
31the plaintiff was deterred from accessing a place of public
32accommodation on a particular
occasion.
33(c) A violation personally encountered by a plaintiff may be
34sufficient to cause a denial of full and equal access if the plaintiff
35experienced difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment because of
36the violation.
37(d) A plaintiff demonstrates that he or she was deterred from
38accessing a place of public accommodation on a particular occasion
39only if both of the following apply:
P8 1(1) The plaintiff had actual knowledge of a violation or
2violations that prevented or reasonably dissuaded the plaintiff from
3accessing a place of public accommodation that the plaintiff
4intended to use on a particular occasion.
5(2) The violation or violations would have
actually denied the
6plaintiff full and equal access if the plaintiff had accessed the place
7of public accommodation on that particular occasion.
8(e) Statutory damages may be assessed pursuant to subdivision
9(a) based on each particular occasion that the plaintiff was denied
10full and equal access, and not upon the number of violations of
11construction-related accessibility standards identified at the place
12of public accommodation where the denial of full and equal access
13occurred. If the place of public accommodation consists of distinct
14facilities that offer distinct services, statutory damages may be
15assessed based on each denial of full and equal access to the distinct
16facility, and not upon the number of violations of
17construction-related accessibility standards identified at the place
18of public accommodation where the denial of full and equal
access
19occurred.
20(f) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a defendant’s liability
21for statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim
22against a place of public accommodation is reduced to a minimum
23of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each offense if the defendant
24demonstrates that it has corrected all construction-related violations
25that are the basis of a claim within 60 days of being served with
26the complaint, and the defendant demonstrates any of the following:
27(A) The structure or area of the alleged violation was determined
28to be “CASp-inspected” or “meets applicable standards” and, to
29the best of the defendant’s knowledge, there were no modifications
30or alterations that impacted compliance with construction-related
31accessibility
standards with respect to the plaintiff’s claim that
32were completed or commenced between the date of that
33determination and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff
34was allegedly denied full and equal access.
35(B) The structure or area of the alleged violation was the subject
36of an inspection report indicating “CASp determination pending”
37or “inspected by a CASp,” and the defendant has either
38implemented reasonable measures to correct the alleged violation
39before the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was allegedly
40denied full and equal access, or the defendant was in the process
P9 1of correcting the alleged violation within a reasonable time and
2manner before the particular occasion on which the plaintiff was
3allegedly denied full and equal access.
4(C) For a
claim alleging a construction-related accessibility
5violation filed before January 1, 2018, the structure or area of the
6alleged violation was a new construction or an improvement that
7was approved by, and passed inspection by, the local building
8department permit and inspection process on or after January 1,
92008, and before January 1, 2016, and, to the best of the
10defendant’s knowledge, there were no modifications or alterations
11that impacted compliance with respect to the plaintiff’s claim that
12were completed or commenced between the completion date of
13the new construction or improvement and the particular occasion
14on which the plaintiff was allegedly denied full and equal access.
15(D) The structure or area of the alleged violation was new
16construction or an improvement that was approved by, and passed
17inspection by, a local building department
official who is a certified
18access specialist, and, to the best of the defendant’s knowledge,
19there were no modifications or alterations that affected compliance
20with respect to the plaintiff’s claim that were completed or
21commenced between the completion date of the new construction
22or improvement and the particular occasion on which the plaintiff
23was allegedly denied full and equal access.
24(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a defendant’s liability for
25statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim
26against a place of public accommodation is reduced to a minimum
27of two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each offense if the defendant
28demonstrates both of the following:
29(A) The defendant has corrected all construction-related
30violations that are the basis of a claim
within 30 days of being
31served with the complaint.
32(B) The defendant is a small business that has employed 25 or
33fewer employees on average over the past three years, or for the
34years it has been in existence if less than three years, as evidenced
35by wage report forms filed with thebegin delete Economicend deletebegin insert Employmentend insert
36 Development Department, and has average annual gross receipts
37of less than three million five hundred thousand dollars
38($3,500,000) over the previous three years, or for the years it has
39been in existence if less than three years, as evidenced by federal
40or state income tax returns. The average annual gross receipts
P10 1dollar amount shall be adjusted biannually by the
Department of
2General Services for changes in the California Consumer Price
3Index for All Urban Consumers, as compiled by the Department
4of Industrial Relations. The Department of General Services shall
5post that adjusted amount on its Internet Web site.
6(3) This subdivision shall not be applicable to intentional
7violations.
8(4) Nothing in this subdivision affects the awarding of actual
9damages, or affects the awarding of treble actual damages.
10(5) This subdivision shall apply only to claims filed on or after
11the effective date of Senate Bill 1186 of the 2011-12 Regular
12Session of the Legislature. Nothing in this subdivision is intended
13to affect a complaint filed before that date.
14(g) This section does not alter the applicable law for the
15awarding of injunctive or other equitable relief for a violation or
16violations of one or more construction-related accessibility
17standards, nor alter any legal obligation of a party to mitigate
18damages.
19(h) In assessing liability under subdivision (d), in an action
20alleging multiple claims for the same construction-related
21accessibility violation on different particular occasions, the court
22shall consider the reasonableness of the plaintiff’s conduct in light
23of the plaintiff’s obligation, if any, to mitigate damages.
Section 55.565 is added to the Civil Code, to read:
(a) When a plaintiff brings a construction-related
27accessibility claim alleging a violation of a construction-related
28accessibility standard within three years of a change in that
29standard, statutory damages under subdivision (a) of Section 52
30or subdivision (a) of Section 54.3 may be recovered against a place
31of public accommodation only if the plaintiff provides the owner,
32agent, or other party responsible for the place of public
33accommodation where the alleged violation occurred with
34sufficient written notice of the allegations and alleged access
35barriers on which the claim is based at least 60 days prior to the
36filing of any action and the alleged access barriers are not removed.
37(b) A written notice is sufficient for the purposes of subdivision
38(a) if either of the following conditions is met:
39(1) The notice states facts sufficient to allow a reasonable person
40to identify the basis of the construction-related accessibility claim
P11 1under subdivision (a) of Section 55.31 and states that the recipient
2may be civilly liable for actual and statutory damages for a
3violation of a construction-related accessibility requirement if the
4access barriers that constitute the basis of the construction-related
5accessibility claim are not removed within 60 days.
6(2) The notice is a written demand letter that offers prelitigation
7settlement negotiations in accordance with subdivision (b) of
8Section 55.31.
9(c) For the purposes of this section, “construction-related
10accessibility claim,” “construction-related accessibility standard,”
11and “place of public accommodation” have the meanings set forth
12in Section 55.52.
begin insertSection 17053.42 of the end insertbegin insertRevenue and Taxation Codeend insert
14begin insert is amended to read:end insert
(a) For each taxable year beginning on or after
16January 1, 1996, there shall be allowed as a credit against the “net
17tax,” as defined in Section 17039, the amount paid or incurred for
18eligible access expenditures. The credit shall be allowed in
19accordance with Section 44 of the Internal Revenue Code, relating
20to expenditures to provide access to disabled individuals, except
21that the credit amount specified in subdivision (b) shall be
22substituted for the credit amount specified in Section 44(a) of the
23Internal Revenuebegin delete Code.end deletebegin insert Code, relating to general rule.end insert
24(b) The credit amount allowed under this section shall be 50
25percent of so much of the eligible access expenditures for the
26taxable year as do not exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
27(c) (1) For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016,
28Section 44 (c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to certain
29expenditures included, is modified to include the amount paid or
30incurred for a site to be inspected by a CASp, which is a certified
31access specialist.
32(2) Certified access specialist,” “inspected by a CASp,” and
33“site” shall have the same meanings as those terms are defined
34in subdivision (a) of
Section 55.52 of the Civil Code.
35(c)
end delete
36begin insert(d)end insert In the case where the credit allowed by this section exceeds
37the “net tax,” the excess may be carried over to reduce the “net
38tax” in the following year, and succeeding years if necessary, until
39the credit is exhausted.
begin insertSection 23642 of the end insertbegin insertRevenue and Taxation Codeend insertbegin insert is
2amended to read:end insert
(a) For each taxable year beginning on or after January
41, 1996, there shall be allowed as a credit against the “tax,” as
5defined in Section 23036, the amount paid or incurred for eligible
6access expenditures. The credit shall be allowed in accordance
7with Section 44 of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to
8expenditures to provide access to disabled individuals, except that
9the credit amount specified in subdivision (b) shall be substituted
10for the credit amount specified in Section 44(a) of the Internal
11Revenuebegin delete Code.end deletebegin insert Code, relating to general rule.end insert
12(b) The credit amount allowed under this section shall be 50
13percent of so much of the eligible access expenditures for the
14taxable year as do not exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
15(c) (1) For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016,
16Section 44 (c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to certain
17expenditures included, is modified to include the amount paid or
18incurred for a site to be inspected by a CASp, which is a certified
19access specialist.
20(2) “Certified access specialist,” “inspected by a CASp,” and
21“site” shall have the same meanings as those terms are defined
22in subdivision (a) of
Section 55.52 of the Civil Code.
23(c)
end delete
24begin insert(d)end insert In the case where the credit allowed by this section exceeds
25the “tax,” the excess may be carried over to reduce the “tax” in
26the following year, and succeeding years if necessary, until the
27credit is exhausted.
O
97