BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 69 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 30, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PRIVACY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Mike Gatto, Chair AB 69 (Rodriguez) - As Amended April 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Peace officers: body-worn cameras SUMMARY: Specifies a set of "best practices" that any law enforcement agency, department or entity establishing policies and procedures for the implementation and operation of a body-worn camera system must consider, and declares any data recorded thereby to be the property of the agency which produced it. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires law enforcement agencies, departments, or entities that establish policies and procedures for the implementation and operation of a body-worn camera system to consider the following best practices: a) Designate the person responsible for downloading the recorded data from the body-worn camera, as specified. b) Establish when data should be downloaded to ensure the data is entered into the system in a timely manner, the cameras are properly maintained and ready for the next use, and for purposes of tagging and categorizing the data. c) Establish specific measures to prevent data AB 69 Page 2 tampering, deleting, and copying, including prohibiting the unauthorized use, duplication, or distribution of body-worn camera data. d) Categorize and tag body-worn camera video at the time the data is downloaded and classified according to the type of event or incident captured in the data. e) Specifically state the length of time that recorded data shall be stored, as follows: i. Except as provided below, a law enforcement agency shall retain non-evidentiary data including video and audio recorded by a body-worn camera for a minimum of one year, after which it will be erased, destroyed, or recycled. ii. A law enforcement agency shall retain evidentiary data including video and audio recorded by a body-worn camera under this section for a minimum of three years under any of the following situations: 1. The recording is of an incident involving the use of force by a peace officer or an officer-involved shooting. 2. The recording is of an incident that leads to the detention or arrest of an individual. 3. The recording is relevant to a formal or informal complaint against a law enforcement officer or a law enforcement agency. AB 69 Page 3 iii. If evidence that may be relevant to a criminal prosecution is obtained from a recording made by a body-worn camera, the law enforcement agency shall retain the recording for any time beyond that otherwise required, and in the same manner as is required by law for other evidence that may be relevant to a criminal prosecution. f) Specify where the body-worn camera data will be stored. g) Consider certain factors for protecting the security and integrity of the data where a third-party vendor is used to manage the data storage system. 2)Defines, for purposes of the required consideration, the term "evidentiary data" to mean "data of an incident or encounter that could prove useful for investigative purposes, including, but not limited to, a crime, an arrest or citation, a search, a use of force incident, or a confrontational encounter with a member of the public." 3)Clarifies that the retention period for evidentiary data is specified in state evidentiary laws. 4)Defines, for purposes of the required consideration, the term "nonevidentiary data" to mean "data that does not necessarily have value to aid in an investigation or prosecution, such as data of an incident or encounter that does not lead to an arrest or citation, or data of general activities the officer might perform while on duty." 5)Declares all recorded media, images, and audio from body-worn cameras to be the property of the law enforcement agency, AB 69 Page 4 department, or entity that produced it, and may not be copied, released, or disseminated without the written consent of the head of the agency, unless otherwise authorized by law. 6)Declares the intent of the Legislature to establish policies and procedures based on best practices for downloading and storing data recorded by a body-worn camera worn by a peace officer. EXISTING LAW: 1)Makes it a crime to intentionally record a confidential communication without the consent of all parties to the communication. (Penal Code (PC) Section 632, subd. (a)) 2)Exempts specified peace officers from that provision if they are acting within the scope of their authority. (PC 633) 3)Generally requires, pursuant to the CPRA, that public agencies disclose a government record to the public upon request, unless there is a specific reason to withhold it or if a public agency can establish that the public interest in nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure. (Government Code Section 6250, et seq.) FISCAL EFFECT: None. This bill is currently keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel. COMMENTS: AB 69 Page 5 1)Purpose of this bill . This bill is intended to provide law enforcement agencies with a list of best practices for the implementation of body-worn cameras to consider when developing their own policies and procedures. AB 69 is author-sponsored. 2)Author's statement. According to the author, "Body-worn cameras are the newest law enforcement tool being implemented by several police departments statewide to capture law enforcement officers' interactions with the public..." According to a September 2014 report by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), "there is a correlation between the use of body-worn cameras and the reduction of excessive use of force complaints. Benefits cited from having law enforcement officers wear cameras include documenting evidence; providing the opportunity for officer training by reviewing data of different situations to ensure officers are following best practices and improving ways to best handle an incident; preventing and resolving citizen complaints by members of the public; and strengthening law enforcement transparency and accountability. However, there are also concerns that need to be addressed as we continue to learn how this new developing technology actually works in the field including privacy rights and the impact on community relations. "Although many law enforcement departments currently using body-worn cameras have formal policies covering some key issues, such as when to record and how long to retain recordings, those policies will likely need to evolve as departments develop better understandings of how body-worn cameras affect policing practices on the ground. AB 69 Page 6 "AB 69 seeks to provide guidelines for developing and implementing policies and procedures for downloading and storing data from body-worn cameras." 3)The use of body cameras in law enforcement . As a result of a string of well-publicized incidents involving the use of force by law enforcement officers against African-American men, beginning with the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 9, 2014, a public debate has emerged over the use of body-worn cameras by peace officers. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, there are no fewer than 30 states currently considering some form of legislation on the topic. A body-worn camera is a small video camera - typically attached to an officer's clothing, helmet or sunglasses - can capture, from an officer's point of view, video and audio recordings of activities, including traffic stops, arrests, searches, interrogations, and critical incidents such as officer-involved shootings. There is substantial evidence to suggest that body-worn cameras can have positive effects on policing. A 2012 study of the Rialto, CA police department's use of body-worn cameras found that the devices were correlated with a 60% reduction in officer use of force incidents following camera deployment, with twice the number of use of force incidents reported among the group of officers without cameras. The report also found an 88% reduction in the number of citizens' complaints in the year after cameras were introduced. To explain the effect of body-worn cameras, the Rialto Chief of Police was quoted as saying, "Whether the reduced number of complaints was because AB 69 Page 7 of the officers behaving better or the citizens behaving better - well, it was probably a little bit of both." According to a November 2014 report by the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented Policing Services and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), a broad survey of police departments that had deployed body-worn cameras has many benefits: "body-worn cameras are useful for documenting evidence; officer training; preventing and resolving complaints brought by members of the public; and strengthening police transparency, performance and accountability...body-worn cameras [also] help police departments ensure events are also captured from an officer's perspective." However, the report also notes that "[t]he use of body-worn cameras also raises important questions about privacy and trust." 4)The California Public Records Act . As noted above, the video and audio data produced by peace officers with body-worn cameras is considered a public record under the California Public Records Act (CPRA), and is therefore subject to disclosure to the public unless otherwise exempt. The CPRA requires public agencies to generally respond to a records request within 10 days, and make eligible public records promptly available to a requester who pays the direct costs of duplication. In order to withhold a record, a public agency must demonstrate that a record is exempt under express provisions of the CPRA, or else must show that "on the facts of the particular case the public interest served by not disclosing the record clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record." Whenever a state or local agency discloses a public record that would otherwise be exempt, that disclosure constitutes a waiver of the exemption. The CPRA provides a detailed list of documents that are exempt from disclosure, including: personnel files; records of AB 69 Page 8 complaints; and investigatory and security files complied by state or local law enforcement agencies, although specified written information must be provided regarding the individuals involved in those incidents or investigations. 5)Privacy considerations raised by this bill . This bill in its current form does not mandate the use of any of the specified 'best practices' - it simply requires a law enforce agency to consider these best practices when establishing policies and procedures for the implementation and operation of a body-worn camera system. In essence, the provisions of this bill are advisory only, and largely restricted to matters internal to the law enforcement agency implementing the system and the use of the data within the criminal justice system. However, the bill contains one provision that deals directly with the privacy of civilians not formally the subject of a law enforcement investigation: the recommendation that a law enforcement agency retain non-evidentiary video and audio recordings for a minimum of one year before they may be erased, destroyed or recycled. The PERF report from which many of the best practices in this bill are taken does not formally recommend that non-evidentiary data be retained for one year. It does recommend that the agency disclose the length of time such data is retained, and notes that "many agencies provide 60-day or 90-day retention times" for non-evidentiary data. It also says that states should set retention times in light of other factors, such as the agencies current retention policies for other data, the openness of the state's public records laws, the need to preserve footage to promote transparency and investigate citizen's complaints, and the agency's capacity for data storage. To the extent that the PERF report does not actually recommend a one-year retention period for non-evidentiary data, instead pointing to 60-day or 90-day periods as closer to the norm, it AB 69 Page 9 would provide greater protection for individual privacy to shorten the recommended retention period, thereby reducing the amount of time that footage of civilians not under suspicion of having committed a crime is retained as a public record and available for disclosure to the public. The Committee may wish to consider amending the recommended 'best practice' to reflect a shorter 60-day retention period for non-evidentiary data: Page 2, line 35, strike and replace the words "one year" with "60 days" 6)Related Legislation. AB 66 (Weber) establishes mandatory requirements and recommended guidelines for the use of body-worn cameras by peace officers and the handling of the resulting video and audio data. AB 65 is currently pending in the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee. AB 65 (Alejo) would redirect funds from the Driver Training Penalty Assessment Fund and allocates that money to the Board of State and Community Corrections to be used to fund local law enforcement agencies to operate a body-worn camera program. AB 65 is currently pending on the Suspense File in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. AB 1246 (Quirk) would prohibit the disclosure of a recording made by a body-worn camera, except to the person whose image is recorded by the body worn camera. AB 1246 is currently pending in the Assembly Public Safety Committee. AB 69 Page 10 SB 175 (Huff) would require each department or agency that employs peace officers and that elects to require those peace officers to wear body-worn cameras to develop a policy relating to the use of body-worn cameras. SB 175 is currently pending in on the Senate Floor. SB 195 (Anderson) would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that protects the privacy of individuals recorded by body-worn cameras utilized by law enforcement officers and the privacy of the officers wearing these cameras. SB 195 is currently pending in the Senate Rules Committee. 7)Double-referral . This bill was double-referred to the Assembly Public Safety Committee, where it was heard on April 7, 2015, and passed on a 7-0 vote. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support None on file. AB 69 Page 11 Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Hank Dempsey / P. & C.P. / (916) 319-2200