ACR 98, as introduced, Beth Gaines. State employee merit awards.
This measure would declare that merit award payments in specified amounts, authorized by the Department of Human Resources, are made to specified current or retired state employees whose proposals have resulted in annual savings and net revenue gains to the state.
Fiscal committee: yes.
P1 1WHEREAS, Section 19823 of the Government Code authorizes
2the Department of Human Resources to make awards to current
3or retired state employees who propose procedures or ideas that
4are subsequently adopted and placed in effect and result in
5eliminating or reducing state expenditures or improving state
6operations; and
7WHEREAS, Any award granted under Section 19823 of the
8Government Code in excess of $5,000 must be approved by
9concurrent resolution of the Legislature; and
10WHEREAS, As described below, three individuals should be
11awarded for their effective, cost-saving ideas; and
12WHEREAS, The Case Record Unit of the Department of
13Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) is responsible for
14calculating the release dates of convicted offenders serving prison
P2 1time. The information is recorded on a calculation form. The unit
2was using the Offender Based Information System (OBIS), which
3was developed in the 1970s, as a primary automated system for
4storing offender data. However, OBIS was not able to automatically
5factor in the new sentencing laws enacted in the 1990s; and
6WHEREAS, Court decisions complicated the release date
7calculations for violent and habitual offenders. Approximately
830,000 cases had to be recalculated. For each record, staff had to
9manually perform 9-12 calculations and 23-31 entries using paper,
10pencil, and a desk calculator. A miscalculated offender release
11date was the serious consequence of any error; and
12WHEREAS, Andrew Brown, a Correctional Officer and
13Permanent Intermittent Correctional Case Records Analyst,
14suggested that CDCR automate the Earliest Possible Release Date
15and the Minimum Eligible Parole Date. Mr. Brown created an
16Excel spreadsheet that simplified the process of calculating release
17dates, reduced the chance of error, and created a more professional
18document. This suggestion reduced the possibility of errors and
19increased productivity; and
20WHEREAS, The annual savings to CDCR in staff time was
21$133,198. Mr. Brown’s approved award was $26,640. Mr. Brown
22has received the initial $5,000 and this resolution is needed to
23award Mr. Brown the $21,640 balance. This idea has not only
24improved efficiency at CDCR, it also safeguards the citizens of
25California from the possible erroneous release of a violent offender;
26and
27WHEREAS, The State Department of Health Care Services
28(DHCS) mails a consumer guide monthly to Medi-Cal beneficiaries
29to help them choose the best health care plan for themselves and
30their families. The comparison charts in the County of Sacramento
31and the County of San Diego guides were four pages and each
32guide weighed two ounces; and
33WHEREAS, Kathleen Simpson, a Staff Information Systems
34Analyst with DHCS, suggested reformatting the two guides. The
35reformatting reduced the mailing weight of each guide from two
36ounces to one and also reduced the printing costs. As a result of
37these reductions, DHCS realized an annual cost savings of
38$48,233.36. Ms. Simpson’s award was $9,646.67. Ms. Simpson
39has received the initial $5,000 and this resolution is needed to
40award Ms. Simpson the $4,646.67 balance for this idea; and
P3 1WHEREAS, Mr. Wayne Stalie, an Equipment Maintenance
2Supervisor at CDCR, suggested two institutions, the California
3State Prison, Corcoran and the California Substance Abuse
4Treatment Facility, Corcoran, eliminate their contracted trash
5service and instead utilize existing staff and resources to share
6trash collection costs and services. CDCR recently noted that the
7two institutions have continued to save money with this resourceful
8idea; and
9WHEREAS, The documented first year savings were $434,226.
10Mr. Stalie’s approved award was $43,423. Mr. Stalie has received
11the initial $5,000 and this resolution is needed to award Mr. Stalie
12the $38,423 balance; and
13WHEREAS, The savings generated by implementation of these
14suggestions will continue to be realized on an annual basis; and
15WHEREAS, As a result of actual savings generated from the
16implementation of these suggestions, it is unnecessary to
17appropriate additional funds for payment of awards to these
18employees; now, therefore, be it
19Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
20thereof concurring, That the Legislature of the State of California
21hereby declares that merit award payments, authorized by the
22five-member Merit Award Board and the Department of Human
23Resources, are hereby made in amounts up to and including 10 or
2420 percent of the first-year savings generated by each suggestion,
25as follows:
26(a) To Andrew Brown in the amount of $21,640.
27(b) To Kathleen Simpson in the amount of $4,646.67.
28(c) To Wayne Stalie in the amount of $38,423; and be it further
29Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
30of this resolution to the Controller and to the Department of Human
31Resources.
O
99