BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW
                              Senator Mark Leno, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

          Bill No:            AB 106          Hearing Date:    June 18,  
          2015
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Author:   |Committee on Budget                                   |
          |----------+------------------------------------------------------|
          |Version:  |January  9, 2015    Introduced                        |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Urgency:  |No                     |Fiscal:    |Yes              |
           ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant|Samantha  Lui                                         |
          |:         |                                                      |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          

             Subject:  Budget Act of 2015: Human Services Trailer Bill.


          Summary: Provides for statutory changes necessary to enact human  
          services-related provisions of the Budget Act of 2015.

          Background:  As part of the 2015-16 budget package, Assembly Bill 106 makes  
          statutory changes to implement the budget act.

          Proposed  
          Law:  AB 106 makes the following statutory changes to implement the  
          2015-16 budget. 

           Federal immigration assistance  . On November 20, 2014, President  
          Obama issued executive orders that expanded the population  
          eligible for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)  
          program, and to include new Deferred Action for Parents of  
          Americans (DAPA). Effective January 1, 2016, trailer bill: 

             1.   Requires that the department must provide grants to  
               qualified non-profit organizations who meet the definition  
               of the Internal Revenue Service 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(5). 
             2.   Specifies the types of services that a nonprofit  
               organization may provide, including:
                  a.        Services to assist with the application  
                    process for initial or renewal of deferred action  
                    under the DACA policy or the DAPA policy; 
                  b.        Services to provide legal training and  
                    technical assistance to eligible non-profits;







          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 2  
          of ?
          
          
                  c.        Services to help obtain other immigration  
                    remedies for people receiving DACA or DAPA application  
                    assistance;
                  d.        Services to assistance with naturalization or  
                    appeals that arise from the process.
             3.   Defines the services that can be provided that assist  
               the application process to include: outreach, workshop  
               presentations, document review, Freedom of Information Act  
               requests, and screening services to assist individuals with  
               DACA, DAPA, naturalization, or other immigration remedies.
             4.   Defines "legal training and assistance" to include  
               webinars, in-person trainings, and technical assistance in  
               the form of answering questions via email, fax, or phone 
             5.   Requires that grants awarded must fulfill specified  
               criteria, including:
                  a.        For nonprofits under 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(5)  
                    status, have at least three years of experience  
                    handling immigration cases; have conducted trainings  
                    on immigration beyond staff persons; and are  
                    accredited by the Board of Immigration Appeals under  
                    the U.S. Department of Justice's Executive Office for  
                    Immigration Review, or be a Trust Fund Program  
                    administered by the State Bar of California 
                  b.        For a legal services organization that  
                    provides legal training and technical assistance, have  
                    at least ten years of experience conducting  
                    immigration legal services and receive funding by the  
                    Trust Fund Program administered by the State Bar of  
                    California.
             6.   Requires grant recipients maintain adequate legal  
               malpractice insurance.
             7.   Requires the department to report to the fiscal  
               legislative committees the following information: 
                  a.        Implementation timeline;
                  b.        Participating entities awarded contracts and  
                    grants;
                  c.        Number of applications submitted;
                  d.        Types of services provided and in what  
                    language;
                  e.        Ethnic communities served; and
                  f.        Identification of further barriers and  
                    challenges to immigration assistance and legal  
                    services related to naturalization and deferred  
                    action. 








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 3  
          of ?
          
          
             8.   Limits the amount of grant funds available to be  
               advanced to a qualified nonprofit to 40 percent.
             9.   Requires the department, subject to available Budget Act  
               funding, provide grants to organizations that provide free  
               education and outreach information, services, and  
               materials. 
             10.  Define the terms "education" and "outreach" to include  
               referrals to educational or legal services that support an  
               applicant's eligibility for citizenship or deferred action,  
               and the importance of participating in civic engagement as  
               a naturalized citizen. Education and outreach activities  
               are prohibited from including representation as legal  
               counsel that assists in the application process. 
           
          CalWORKs  . The bill includes provisions pertaining to the  
          CalWORKs program, including: 

              1.   Housing Support Program (HSP)  . SB 855 (Budget and Fiscal  
               Review), Chapter 29, Statutes of 2014, established the  
               CalWORKs Housing Support Program and provides $20 million  
               ($12 million General Fund) ongoing to specified counties to  
               provide evidence-based interventions to families receiving  
               CalWORKs who are at risk for homelessness, or are homeless.  
               Services could include landlord outreach, housing search  
               and placement, legal services, and housing barrier  
               assessment. Trailer bill language contains the following  
               provisions:
          
               a.     Requires the department to award funds, according to  
                 criteria developed by the department in consultation with  
                 the County Welfare Directors Association, to provide  
                 CalWORKs housing support to recipients who are  
                 experiencing homelessness or housing instability. 
               b.     Authorizes counties to continue providing housing  
                 support under the CalWORKs Housing Support Program to a  
                 recipient who may no longer be income eligible for  
                 CalWORKs. 
               c.     Other technical, non-substantive changes.

              1.   Child support pass-through for long-term sanction cases  .  
               Federal law prohibits the Department of Child Support  
               Services from passing collected child support through to  
               the state on behalf of non-Temporary Assistance to Needy  
               Families (TANF) families and requires payments be made  








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 4  
          of ?
          
          
               directly to the family. In contrast, state law requires  
               families to assign support rights and requires counties to  
               refer families on CalWORKs to the Local Child Support  
               Agencies. This bill resolves the federal and state law  
               conflicts, and exempts long-term sanction cases from  
               assigning their child and spousal support rights to the  
               state/county. Funding for these cases is switched to  
               non-maintenance of effort General Fund, so these cases will  
               no longer assign their child support to the state. As a  
               result, the Department of Child Support Services will no  
               longer be required to track these cases.

              2.   Mid-Year Reporting Requirement  . Previous law requires a  
               CalWORKs recipient to report a drug felony conviction, as  
               specified, within ten days. Senate Bill 855 (Budget and  
               Fiscal Review), Chapter 29, Statutes of 2014, made eligible  
               adults who were previously ineligible for benefits due to a  
               prior felony drug conviction, effective April 1, 2015. AB  
               106 deletes an outdated mid-period reporting requirement  
               that is no longer applicable. 

           Community Care Licensing  . The bill includes provisions  
          pertaining to the Community Care Licensing (CCL) division within  
          DSS. Specifically, the bill establishes inspection frequency, by  
          facility type. The language increases the frequency of  
          inspections from the current level of at least once every five  
          years, to once every three years for child care facilities; once  
          every two years for children's residential facilities; and  
          annual inspections for adult and senior care facilities. The  
          table compares current law to the new inspection requirements,  
          by facility type and over time. 


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |            |            |                                       |
          | Facility   |  Current   |                                       |
          |   Type     |    Law     |                                       |
          |            |            |                                       |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |            |            |            |            |             |
          |            |            | Stage 1:   | Stage 2:   | Stage 3:    |
          |            |            |            |            |             |
          |            |            |  January   |  January   |  January    |








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 5  
          of ?
          
          
          |            |            |   2017     |   2018     |    2019     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |            | Inspections must occur at least once every. . .    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          | Child care | 5 years    | 3 years    | 3 years    | 3 years     |
          |  facilities|            |            |  (unchanged|  (unchanged |
          |            |            |            |   from     |  from stage |
          |            |            |            |  stage 1)  |  1)         |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          | Children's | 5 years    | 3 years    | 2 years    | 2 years     |
          |  residentia|            |            |            |  (unchanged |
          |  l care    |            |            |            |  from stage |
          |  facilities|            |            |            |  2)         |
          |            |            |            |            |             |
          |------------+------------+------------+------------+-------------|
          | Adult and  | 5 years    | 3 years    | 2 years    | 1           |
          |  senior    |            |            |            |year         |
          |  care      |            |            |            |             |
          |  facilities|            |            |            |             |
          |            |            |            |            |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          The CCL division will continue to conduct random inspections on  
          at least 30 percent of all facilities annually, as is current  
          practice.

           Child Welfare Services  . The bill contains the following  
          provisions pertaining to child welfare services, including: 

              1.   Approved Relative Caregiver (ARC) program  . Senate Bill  
               855 (Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 29, Statutes of  
               2014, established the Approved Relative Caregiver Option  
               Program and provided an ongoing annual appropriation of $30  
               million GF, to be adjusted annually by CNI. Under the ARC  
               program, relative caregivers receive an applicable regional  
               per-child CalWORKs grant, plus the General Fund portion in  
               an amount that provides a rate equal to the basic foster  
               family home rate (based on the age of the child).  
               Participating counties are provided General Fund, based on  
               the a county's number of eligible approved relative  
               caregiver placements in the county as of July 1, 2014. If  








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 6  
          of ?
          
          
               the county-specific ARC caseload exceeds the baseline  
               caseload of July 1, 2014, the county must be responsible  
               for making the full ARC payments and responsible for the  
               county-share of the CalWORKs payment. The langauge  
               streamlines the application process for grant payments,  
               maximizes federal funding, and ensures that families do not  
               experience a break in services or payment. Specifically,  
               the language specifies:

               a.     Foster children and non-minor dependents (NMDs), who  
                 are eligible to receive an approved relative caregiver  
                 (ARC) payment will be placed into a separate assistance  
                 unit. 
               b.     The CalWORKs portion of the payment will be the  
                 exempt maximum aid payment for an assistance unit of one.
               c.     If the approved relative caregiver is needy, his or  
                 her assistance unit size will include the number of ARC  
                 children, or NMDs, only for pruposes of determining  
                 program income and eligiblity of the CalWORKs assistance  
                 unit. For purposes of calculating the grant amount for  
                 the needy caregiver, the ARC child and NMD is excluded.
               d.     Foster care resource limits will be used to  
                 determine eligiblity of an ARC child and NMD.
               e.     Overpayments will be collected pursuant to existing  
                 foster care program requirements.
               f.     County of court jurisdiction has payment  
                 responsibliy for ARC children and NMDs.
               g.     An approved relative caregiver is exempt from  
                 Statewide Fingerprint Imaging Systems, reporting,  
                 immunization, and other CalWORKs requirements.
               h.     The General Fund (GF) appropriation must be  
                 increased annually by an amount greater than the CNI to  
                 ensure that the caregiver payments get a full California  
                 Necessities Index (CNI) adjustment.
               i.     The GF  portion of the ARC payment may be countable  
                 towards maintenance-of-effort (MOE), only if the GF is  
                 not counted as MOE for another purpose. 
               j.     The department must presume that counties have  
                 opted-out of the program if funding for the base period  
                 is reduced under specified conditions, unless a county  
                 notifies the department in writing of its intent to  
                 opt-in within 60 days of the enactment of the state  
                 budget. 
               aa.    In a circumstance whereby a county decides to no  








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 7  
          of ?
          
          
                 longer participate in the ARC program, the county must  
                 provide at least 90 days notice to the approved relative  
                 caregiver(s) that the per child per month payment will be  
                 reduced, and the date the reduction will occur.

              1.   Intensive Treatment Foster Care (ITFC) rate extension  .  
               ITFC offers an alternative, family-like setting for foster  
               children who would otherwise be placed in group homes Rate  
               Classification Level (RCL) 9 through 11. SB 1013 (Budget  
               and Fiscal Review Committee), Chapter 35, Statutes of 2012,  
               authorized the Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) effort to  
               develop recommendations related to the state's current rate  
               setting system, and to services and programs that serve  
               children and families in the continuum of Aid to Families  
               with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) eligible  
               placement settings. In addition, SB 1013 provided for an  
               interim increase in rates, including a California  
               Necessities Index increase, intended to ensure providers  
               keep pace with the costs of providing care, recruitment,  
               and retaining qualified foster caregivers for children  
               needing intensive treatment in a home-based setting.  
               Trailer bill language that includes the following  
               provisions:

                  a.        Extends, from June 30, 2015 to December 31,  
                    2016, the applicable interim period for specified  
                    modified service and rate levels, which support  
                    modified in-home support counselor hours per month,  
                    apply.
                  b.        Extends, from June 30, 2015 to December 31,  
                    2016, the interim period for which specified modified  
                    serve and rate levels, that support the modified  
                    standard rate schedule, apply. 
                  c.        Requires the rate for the modified standard  
                    rate be adjusted for the California Necessities Index  
                    on July 1, 2015, and on July 1, 2016.

           Adult Protective Services . The department shall, to the extent  
          funding for this purpose remains with the department, establish  
          one full-time position which reports to the director to assist  
          counties with the following functions in their operation of the  
          adult protective services system
           
          1991 Realignment  . AB 85 modified 1991 Realignment Local Revenue  








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 8  
          of ?
          
          
          Fund (LRF) distributions to capture and redirect county savings  
          resulting from the implementation of federal health care reform  
          effective January 1, 2014. AB 85 established the Family Support  
          Subaccount within the LRF beginning in 2013-14. The Family  
          Support Subaccount receives sales tax revenues redirected from  
          the Health Subaccount, which then redistributes the funds to  
          counties for the CalWORKs program. While this redirection  
          mechanism frees up General Fund resources to pay for Medi-Cal  
          costs, according to the Administration, the process to achieve  
          this is significantly burdensome for the State Controller's  
          Office and the Department of Finance. The language eliminates  
          the need to redirect sales and use tax and vehicle license fee  
          revenues between the Health and Social Services Subaccounts and  
          makes other necessary technical and clarifying changes related  
          to AB 85 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 24, Statutes of 2013. 

           Other issues  . The bill also includes additional provisions: 

              1.   Data sharing agreements  . Authorizes the Employment  
               Development Department (EDD) to share data with federal,  
               state, or local government departments or agencies, or  
               their contracted agencies, to support social services  
               administration.

              2.   Suspension of the fingerprint licensing fee exemption  .  
               Existing law prohibits the Department of Social Services  
               (DSS) and the Department of Justice from charging a fee to  
               process a criminal history check of individuals who are  
               licensed to operate child and adult facilities, to provide  
               care in a facility, or who reside at that facility. This  
               language authorizes allows DSS to charge fees for this  
               criminal history check and extends this suspension for two  
               additional years.

              3.   Suspension of the incentives under the Department of  
               Child Support Services (DCSS)  . The language suspends a)  
               health insurance incentives and b) improved performance  
               incentives. 

                  a.        Existing law requires the DCSS to provide a  
                    health insurance incentive ($50 per case) to the local  
                    child support agency (LCSA) for obtaining third-party  
                    health coverage, or insurance, for beneficiaries, if  
                    the budget provides GF support for the incentive.  








          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 9  
          of ?
          
          
                    Since 2003, these health insurance incentive payments  
                    to LCSAs have been suspended. This language suspends  
                    the health insurance incentive and the top ten  
                    improved performance incentive for two years. 
                  b.        Existing law requires DCSS to provide to ten  
                    counties, which demonstrate the best performance on  
                    federal and state performance standards, an additional  
                    five percent of the state's share of those counties  
                    collections used to reduce or repay aid. Since 2002,  
                    these top ten performance incentive payments to LCSAs  
                    have been suspended. This language suspends the top  
                    ten improved performance incentive for two years.

              4.   Establishes new successor fund for the California Senior  
               Legislature  . The California Fund for Senior Citizens first  
               appeared on the 1983 personal income tax return. Donations  
               to the California Fund for Senior Citizens support the  
               ongoing work of the CSL. In 2014, the California Fund of  
               Senior Citizens received $229,522 in voluntary  
               contributions. Because it did not meet the minimum  
               contribution amount of $250,000, it fell off the tax  
               check-off for the 2014 tax return. Trailer bill language  
               that establishes the California Senior Legislature Fund as  
               the successor fund of the California Fund for Senior  
               Citizens. 


          Fiscal  
          Effect:  The funding related to the changes in this bill is contained  
          in the 2015-16 budget. In addition, the bill would appropriate  
          $30 million General Fund, effective January 1, 2016, for the  
          Approved Relative Caregiver Program.
          
          Support:   None on file. 
          
          Opposed:  None on file. 
          
          Comments:  This bill provides the necessary statutory references to enact  
          the 2015-16 budget related to human services.
          
          
                                      -- END --
          









          AB 106 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 10  
          of ?