BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW
                              Senator Mark Leno, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

          Bill No:            AB 107          Hearing Date:    June 18,  
          2015
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Author:   |Committee on Budget                                   |
          |----------+------------------------------------------------------|
          |Version:  |January 9, 2015    Introduced                         |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Urgency:  |No                     |Fiscal:    |Yes              |
           ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant|Mark Ibele                                            |
          |:         |                                                      |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          

               Subject:  Budget Act of 2015: Earned Income Tax Credit.


          Summary: This bill is necessary for the enactment of the 2015 Budget Act  
          and would establish a refundable tax credit for eligible  
          individuals based on a certain percentage of earned income up to  
          a specified amount. 

          Background: The measure would create a state Earned Income Tax  
          Credit (EITC), providing a refundable tax credit for wage  
          income. It would focus on households with incomes less than  
          $6,580 if there are no dependents and up to $13,870 if there are  
          three or more dependents. The proposed state program dovetails  
          with the existing federal EITC and would match 85 percent of the  
          federal credits, up to half of the federal phase-in range, and  
          then begin to taper off relative to these maximum wage amounts.  
          The credit would be available beginning with tax returns filed  
          for wages earned in 2015, and is expected to reduce revenues by  
          $380 million annually beginning in 2015-16. It will benefit an  
          estimated 825,000 families and two million individuals. The  
          estimated mean household benefit is $460 per year, with a  
          maximum credit for a household with three or more dependents of  
          over $2,600. The proposed state EITC is intended to complement  
          the federal EITC. The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) would be  
          assigned responsibility for administering the proposed EITC  
          program.
          
          Proposed  
          Law: The bill would establish an EITC credit, specifically:







          AB 107 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 2  
          of ?
          
          
          
             a.   Establish a refundable credit for tax years beginning on  
               or after January 1, 2015 against personal income taxes owed  
               based on earned wage income, which does not include  
               self-employment income.

             b.   Provide for the calculation of a credit amount during a  
               phase-in range of earned wage income according to specified  
               percentages based on the number of qualifying children.

                  i.        The credit percentage would be 7.65 percent  
                    for individuals without qualifying children, 34  
                    percent for individuals with one qualifying child, 40  
                    percent for individuals with two or more qualifying  
                    children, and 45 percent for individuals with three or  
                    more qualifying children.

                  ii.       The phase-in range would be for earned wage  
                    income of up to $3,290 for individuals without  
                    qualifying children, $4,940 for individuals with one  
                    qualifying child, and $6,935 for individuals with two  
                    or more qualifying children.

             c.   Provide for the calculation a phase-out of the credit  
               when earned wage income reaches a certain threshold amount.  
               The credit is phased out by an amount determined by  
               multiplying the applicable phase-out percentage by the  
               excess of the amount of the individual's adjusted gross  
               income (earned wage income plus certain other income) over  
               the phase-out amount. The inclusion of additional income  
               during the phase-out period results in a more rapid loss of  
               the credit amount than there was a gain in the credit  
               during the credit phase-in period.

                  i.        The phase-out percentage would be 7.65 percent  
                    for individuals without qualifying children, 34  
                    percent for individuals with one qualifying child, 40  
                    percent for individuals with two or more qualifying  
                    children, and 45 percent for individuals with three or  
                    more qualifying children.

                  ii.       The phase-out amount would be $3,290 for  
                    individuals without qualifying children, $4,940 for  
                    individuals with one qualifying child, and $6,935 for  








          AB 107 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 3  
          of ?
          
          
                    individuals with two or more qualifying children.

             d.   Establishes that the credit amount is to be multiplied  
               by the adjustment factor to determine the amount of the  
               actual credit, with the adjustment factor specified in the  
               annual budget act. Unless otherwise specified, the  
               adjustment factor would be zero percent. The Administration  
               has proposed 85 percent as the adjustment factor in  
               2015-16.

             e.   Specifies that the tax credit would be operative only  
               for taxable years for which resources are authorized in the  
               annual budget act for the Franchise Tax Board to administer  
               the program.

             f.   Sets forth that if the amount of allowable credit  
               exceeds an individual's tax liability, the balance shall be  
               paid to that individual from the Tax Relief and Refund  
               Account, which is continuously appropriated.

             g.   Provides for a re-computation of the earned wage income  
               amount and the phase-out amount based on inflation, in the  
               same manner as the re-computation of income tax brackets  
               under the personal income tax law.

             h.   Provides that disqualified income from interest and  
               dividends, royalties and other similar sources in excess of  
               $3,400 shall make an individual ineligible for the EITC,  
               with this amount adjusted in the same manner as indicated  
               in (g) above.

             i.   Specifies the failure to be diligent in determining  
               eligibility for the EITC can result in a penalty of $500  
               for false claims for refund.

             j.   Includes annual reporting requirements of the Franchise  
               Tax Board relating to the usage of the credit, average  
               credit, distribution of the credit by income and number of  
               dependents, and estimate of the impact on poverty.

             aa.  Includes uncodified language expressing the  
               Legislature's intent to expand the EITC, as the state's  
               fiscal situation allows.









          AB 107 (Committee on Budget)                            Page 4  
          of ?
          
          
             bb.  Contains a continuous appropriation for the refundable  
               tax credit.

          Fiscal  
          Effect: Refundable amounts would be continuously appropriated from the  
          Tax Relief and Refund Account, and are expected to total $380  
          million during 2015-16 based on an adjustment factor of 85  
          percent incorporated in the 2015 Budget Act..
          
          Support: None on file
          
          Opposed: None on file
          
          Comments: The federal EITC has long been regarded as an  
          effective and efficient program to direct resources to  
          low-income households while theoretically providing work  
          incentives. State EITCs, including the one proposed by the  
          Governor, may channel additional resources towards low-income  
          families, but are likely to have only a marginal work incentive  
          effect, due to the credit amount available. While the maximum  
          credit under the Governor's proposal is around $2,600,  
          Department of Finance indicates that the mean credit is about  
          $460. In discussions with staff, Department of Finance indicated  
          that the median-arguably a more suitable measure of central  
          tendency of the credit-is "probably between $150 and $200." (The  
          median is the midpoint at which 50 percent of households would  
          receive more and 50 percent less than that amount.) The design  
          of the state EITC dovetails with the design of the federal EITC  
          and is targeted at the lowest income population. As noted, the  
          program does not include self-employment income, which is likely  
          to result in the exclusion of the earnings of some individuals  
          and disqualification of other individual entirely.
           
          
          
                                      -- END --