BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 116|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 116
          Author:   Committee on Budget  
          Amended:  6/11/15 in Senate 
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE BUDGET & FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE:  11-4, 6/15/15
           AYES:  Leno, Allen, Beall, Block, Hancock, Mitchell, Monning,  
            Pan, Pavley, Roth, Wolk
           NOES:  Nielsen, Moorlach, Nguyen, Stone
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Anderson

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  Not relevant

           SUBJECT:   Budget Act of 2014: augmentation


          SOURCE:    Author
          
          DIGEST:  This bill augments the Budget Act of 2014 by  
          $521,541,114 (General Fund) and $96,000,000 (Special Funds) to  
          address various funding shortfalls.

          ANALYSIS:  This bill makes supplemental appropriations to the  
          Budget Act of 2014 in order to address the following shortfalls:

          1)Department of Health Care Services:  Increased costs are  
            associated with hospital presumptive eligibility; a delay in  
            Medi-Cal redeterminations; behavioral health treatment  
            services; increased Medicare payments; a decrease in the  
            projected managed care organization tax savings; and reduced  
            federal drug rebates.  These increased costs are partially  
            offset by increased savings due to litigation settlements and  
            additional drug rebates, for a total deficiency of $241.2  








                                                                     AB 116  
                                                                    Page  2


            million General Fund (GF).

          2)Department of Developmental Services: Increased costs are  
            associated with staffing adjustments at the state  
            developmental centers; decertification of four intermediate  
            care facility units at Sonoma Developmental Center; increased  
            caseload and utilization costs for regional center consumers;  
            and continuation costs for residents transitioning into the  
            community from a developmental center.  These increased costs  
            are partially offset by a reduction in the estimated costs for  
            the expansion of the secured treatment program at Porterville  
            Developmental Center; reduced costs for the Fairview and  
            Porterville developmental centers program improvement plan  
            implementation; lower than anticipated costs associated with  
            the state minimum wage increase; and the court action that has  
            delayed implementation of federal overtime requirements, for a  
            total deficiency of $170 million GF.

          3)California Correctional Health Care Services (Receiver):  
            Increased costs are associated with increased California  
            Health Care Facility staffing; Valley Fever testing; new  
            high-cost Hepatitis C treatment; increased pharmaceutical  
            costs; and adjustments based on the medical acuity staffing  
            model, for a total deficiency of $107.7 million GF.

          4)Department of General Services: Increased costs are associated  
            with the ongoing external legal representation in the case of  
            California First, LLP (CalFirst) v. State of California, for a  
            total deficiency of $2.5 million GF.  This case concerns a  
            purchase and sale agreement whereby CalFirst agreed to  
            purchase 11 properties owned by the state.  According to the  
            Administration, this agreement automatically terminated when  
            CalFirst failed to post a second deposit, as required by the  
            agreement.  

          5)Homicide Trials: Under existing law, qualifying counties may  
            seek reimbursement from the State Controller for extraordinary  
            expenses associated with homicide trials.  Two counties,  
            Mariposa County in the case of People v. Cary Stayner and  
            Lassen County in the case of People v. Joanne McElrath and  
            Robin James, qualify for specified reimbursements, for a total  
            supplemental cost of $72,000 GF.  

          6)Public Utilities Commission: Increased costs are associated  







                                                                     AB 116  
                                                                    Page  3


            with the inclusion of wireless cell phones in the Universal  
            Lifeline Telephone Service program, which provides discounted  
            home phone and cell phone services to qualified families.   
            This inclusion resulted in a 60% increase in claims, for a  
            total deficiency of $96 million (Universal Lifeline Telephone  
            Service Trust Administrative Committee Fund).
                    
          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    Yes         Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          SUPPORT:   (Verified6/12/15)


          None received


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified6/12/15)


          None received

           
          Prepared by:Peggy Collins / B. & F.R. / (916) 651-4103
          6/15/15 13:09:20


                                   ****  END  ****