BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó

          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                        AB 147|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |

                                   THIRD READING 

          Bill No:  AB 147
          Author:   Dababneh (D), et al.
          Amended:  6/18/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE:  7-1, 6/17/15
           AYES:  Liu, Block, Hancock, Leyva, Monning, Pan, Vidak
           NOES:  Runner
           NO VOTE RECORDED:  Mendoza


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-1, 4/9/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Postsecondary education: animal research

          SOURCE:    Author

          DIGEST:  This bill requires a public and independent  
          postsecondary institution, as defined, that confines dogs or  
          cats for research purposes, to first offer the dogs or cats to  
          an animal adoption or rescue organization prior to being  
          euthanized, if an institution's existing procedures for adopting  
          the animal have failed and the animal's destruction is not  
          required, as specified.


          Existing law:


                                                                     AB 147  
                                                                    Page  2

          1)Specifies that public health and welfare depend on the humane  
            use of animals for scientific advancement in the diagnosis and  
            treatment of human and animal diseases, for education, for  
            research in the advancement of veterinary, dental, medical and  
            biologic sciences, for research in animal and human nutrition,  
            and improvement and standardization of laboratory procedures  
            of biologic products, pharmaceuticals, and drugs.  (Health and  
            Safety Code §1650)

          2)Declares that no adoptable animal should be euthanized if it  
            can be adopted into a suitable home.  Adoptable animals  
            include only those animals eight weeks of age or older or have  
            manifested no sign of a behavioral or temperamental defect  
            that could pose a health or safety risk and have manifested no  
            sign of disease, injury, or congenital or hereditary condition  
            that adversely affects the health of the animal, as specified.  
             (Civil Code § 1834.4) 

          3)Specifies, that no treatable animal should be euthanized.  A  
            treatable animal includes any animal that is not adoptable but  
            that could become adoptable with reasonable efforts.  (Food  
            and Agricultural Code § 17005)

          4)Specifies that animals that are irremediably suffering from a  
            serious illness or severe injury shall not be held for owner  
            redemption or adoption.  (FAC § 17006)

          This bill: 

          1)Requires a campus of the University of California (UC),  
            California State University (CSU) and California Community  
            Colleges (CCC), an independent institution of higher  
            education, employee or student that confines dogs or cats for  
            research purposes, as specified, to offer the dogs or cats to  
            an animal adoption or rescue organization prior to euthanasia,  
            provided that the institution assesses the health of the  
            animal and determines that the animal is suitable for  
            adoption, the animal's destruction is not required, the animal  


                                                                     AB 147  
                                                                    Page  3

            is no longer needed, and the institutions existing procedures  
            for adoption have failed.   

          2)Authorizes institutions to enter into agreement with an animal  
            adoption or rescue organization, as specified.

          3)Specifies, that this bill does not apply to animals that are  
            suffering from serious illness or severe injury and newborn  
            animals that need maternal care and have been impounded  
            without their mothers, as specified in Section 17006 of the  
            Food and Agricultural Code. 

          4)Defines various terms for the purposes of this bill including:

             a)   "Animal adoption organization" or "animal rescue  
               organization" means a not-for-profit entity that is exempt  
               from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal  
               Revenue Code established for purposes of rescuing animals  
               in need and finding permanent, adoptive homes for those  
               animals and that maintain records pursuant to Section 32003  
               of the Food and Agricultural Code. 

       1)Need for the bill:  According to the author current federal and  
            state law, provide regulations concerning a research animal's,  
            bedding, food, water access, enrichment devices, and pain  
            management yet standards regarding how to care for the animal  
            after research and testing are complete remain unaddressed.  
            This bill attempts to establish state standards for adopting  
            research dogs and cats once research is complete by  
            facilitating relationships between university research  
            laboratories and nonprofit animal rescue organizations or a  
            group of individuals with similar experience, as specified.

       2)How big is the problem?  According to the National Institutes of  
            Health (NIH), in 2014, California received 7,731 grants, more  
            grant funding from NIH (for animal research), than any other  
            state.  California was awarded grants totaling more than $3.4  
            billion.  To note, four of the top 15 U.S.-wide NIH awardees  
            in 2014 were California universities:  UC, Stanford  
            University, University of Southern California, and California  


                                                                     AB 147  
                                                                    Page  4

            Institute of Technology. Specifically, at the UC of the 101  
            dogs utilized in 2014, 28 dogs used in research were  
            euthanized per the pre-approved research protocol and two dogs  
            remained in research. Of the remaining dogs, 30 were returned  
            to the staff or faculty owner and 41 were placed in permanent  
            adopted homes. According to UC, all of the dogs otherwise  
            covered under this measure were adopted out. This bill would  
            permit institutions to continue using  internal procedures for  
            adopting an animal however should those efforts fail the  
            institutions are subsequently required to offer the dogs or  
            cats to the specified third party organizations.   

       3)Existing University Policies.  UC's systemwide "Guidance Memo,"  
            on adoption of research dogs and cats specifies that dogs and  
            cats used in research or teaching may be adopted as companion  
            animals, if the animals are in good health, have an  
            expectation for a normal quality of life, and have suitable  
            temperaments. Additionally, the memo directs the Campus  
            Attending Veterinarian to adopt locally appropriate procedures  
            including the suitability of animal for placement outside the  
            University, the suitability of the organization or individual  
            adopting the animal, the entity that will bear the costs  
            related to the adoption and conformance with applicable state  
            and federal laws, as specified. 

            According to CSU, they do not have any research activities  
            involving dogs and cats on its campuses, but several campuses  
            have policies. Similarly, CCCs that use animals for teaching  
            purposes have adoption policies in place. 

            According to the Association of Independent California  
            Colleges and Universities all of its institutions covered by  
            this bill have policies and practices in place regarding  
            animal care, research, euthanasia and the adoption of health  
            dogs and cats.

       4)Similar Legislation in Other States.  Similar to this bill,  
            Minnesota House File 3172 (Chapter 3123, Statutes of 2014)  
            which sunsets July 1, 2015, requires a higher education  
            research facility that receives public money that confines  
            dogs or cats for science, education, or research purposes and  
            plans on euthanizing a dog or cat for other than science,  


                                                                     AB 147  
                                                                    Page  5

            education, or research purposes must first offer the dog or  
            cat to a nonprofit organization incorporated for the purpose  
            of rescuing animals in need and finding permanent, adoptive  
            homes for the animals. Further, authorizes a facility to enter  
            into agreement with the animal rescue organization and for the  
            purposes of protecting the facility specifies that the  
            facility is immune from any civil liability that otherwise  
            might result from its actions. Two other states Nevada (SB  
            261, 2015) and Connecticut (H.B. 5707, 2015) introduced  
            similar legislation to ensure adoptable research animals find  
            permanent homes. 

       5)Federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA).  The federal Animal Welfare Act  
            (AWA; 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) establishes a regulatory  
            framework for the use and role of animals in research. AWA was  
            signed into law in 1966 seeks to ensure the humane treatment  
            of animals that are intended for research, bred for commercial  
            sale, exhibited to the public, or commercially transported. 

            Under the AWA, public and private research facilities using  
            animals for research, testing, teaching, or experimentation  
            must be registered with the U.S. Department of Agriculture as  
            a "research facility," and must adhere to minimum standards of  
            care. Among other things the act requires each facility to  
            have an attending veterinarian to provide adequate veterinary  
            care to the animals. Additionally, these facilities must  
            submit an annual report identifying the number of regulated  
            animals used and if any painful experiments were conducted.  
            All research universities in the state, (public and private),  
            are accredited by the Association for Assessment and  
            Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International and are  
            subject to additional standards that go above the regulatory  

          Prior Legislation

          AB 2431 (Dababneh, 2014), similar to this measure, required any  
          postsecondary educational institution that confines dogs or cats  
          for research purposes and intends to destroy the dog or cat to  
          first offer the dog or cat to an animal adoption or animal  
          rescue organization. AB 2431 did not include language related to  
          the institutions determining if the animal is no longer needed  


                                                                     AB 147  
                                                                    Page  6

          or exhausting its existing procedures. AB 2431 died in Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee.
          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No

          SUPPORT:   (Verified6/30/15)

          American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
          Animal Human Society of Minnesota 
          Barks of Love
          Best Friends Animal Society 
          Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association
          Molly's Mutts and Meows 
          Numerous Individuals 
          Pasadena Humane Society & SPCA 
          Pine Animal Hospital, Inc.
          Priceless Pets
          Red Rover
          Sacramento SPCA  
          San Francisco SPCA
          Sonoma Humane Society
          State Humane Association of California
          Tails of the City Animal Rescue
          The Amanda Foundation 
          The Humane Society of the United States 
          The Rescue Train

          OPPOSITION:   (Verified6/30/15)

          Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities
          California Biomedical Research Association
          Stanford University

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-1, 4/9/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Campos, Chang, Chau,  


                                                                     AB 147  
                                                                    Page  7

            Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly,  
            Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina  
            Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin,  
            Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,  
            Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Melendez, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, Obernolte, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark  
            Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams,  
            Wood, Atkins
          NOES:  Harper
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Medina, O'Donnell

          Prepared by:Olgalilia Ramirez / ED. / (916) 651-4105
          7/1/15 14:22:45

                                   ****  END  ****