BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 150 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 15, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair AB 150 (Melendez) - As Amended March 18, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy | Public Safety |Vote:| 7 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires an initiative statute be put before the voters to amend Proposition 47 to make the theft of a firearm, valued at $950 or less, a felony. Specifically, this bill: AB 150 Page 2 1)Includes theft of a firearm, without regard to dollar value, in the definition of grand theft, and makes the crime punishable in state prison for 16 months, or two or three years. 2)States that every person who buys or receives a stolen firearm is guilty of an alternate felony/misdemeanor offense punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one year, or by imprisonment in the county jail pursuant to realignment. 3)Provides that this bill amends Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, and shall become effective only when submitted to and approved by the voters. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)One-time General Fund (GF) costs of at least $220,000 to include a measure on the statewide ballot. The current estimate for including a measure on the ballot is approximately $55,000 per page and this measure will require at least four pages, in the voter information guide. 2)Likely minor GF costs for increased state prison commitments for persons with a current or prior violent felony conviction who are convicted of buying or receiving a stolen firearm. The universe of these individuals is expected to be very small, there are several statutes providing for conduct related to firearm possession. COMMENTS: AB 150 Page 3 1)Background. Proposition 47, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, was approved by the voters in November 2014. Proposition 47 reduced the penalties for certain drug and property crimes. Specifically, the initiative reduced the penalties for theft, shoplifting, receiving stolen property, writing bad checks, and check forgery valued at $950 or less from felonies to misdemeanors. However, the measure limited the reduced penalties to offenders who do not have prior convictions for serious or violent felonies and who are not required to register as sex offenders. Proposition 47 put in a blanket $950 threshold for conduct to be considered grand theft. Previously, there were a number of carve-outs which made conduct grand theft based on the conduct involved or the manner in which the crime is committed or based on the value being less than $950. However, the drafters of Proposition 47 stated that they did not intend to reduce the penalty for the theft of a firearm. The rebuttal to the argument against Proposition 47 contained in the ballot arguments stated: "Proposition 47 maintains penalties for gun crimes. Under Prop. 47, possessing a stolen concealed gun remains a felony. Additional felony penalties to prevent felons and gang members from obtaining guns also apply." 2)Purpose. This bill restores the penalties that were in place prior to the passage of Proposition 47 by making theft of a firearm a felony grand theft in all cases, and making buying or receiving a stolen firearm a felony/misdemeanor offense. However, the proposed amendments to statute do require a simple majority of the electorate at the next statewide election, after enactment of this measure. 3)Argument in Support. A co-sponsor, the California Peace AB 150 Page 4 Officers Association (CPOA), states, "Firearm theft does not occur for culprits to recreationally use the weapons, but further crimes such as robbery, burglary, assault, and illegal firearms dealing are most often the acts associated with firearm theft. AB 150 provides a reasonable solution to this problem, and CPOA believes it to be a solution that is common sense and bipartisan." 4)Argument in Opposition. According to the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, "Proposition 47 opponents' biggest and loudest argument was that Proposition 47 should not be passed because it would make theft of a firearm a misdemeanor. That message was seen on billboards, flyers, mailers and TV commercials throughout the State. In the face of this opposition Proposition 47 still passed. The people of California want to spend their tax dollars on safe neighborhoods and schools not prosecuting and incarcerating people who commit drug and low value theft crimes." 5)Related Legislation: a) AB 46 (Lackey) would reverse provisions recently enacted by Proposition 47 related to possession for personal use of specified controlled substances. b) AB 390 (Cooper) would require persons convicted of crimes newly categorized as misdemeanors under Proposition 47 to provide DNA samples. c) AB 1415 (Steinorth) would make it a felony for a person who has had his or her felony conviction recalled and has been resentenced to a misdemeanor, or who has had a felony designated as a misdemeanor, pursuant to Proposition 47, to control any firearm. d) SB 333 (Galgiani) is substantially similar to AB 46 AB 150 Page 5 (Lackey). e) SB 452 (Galgiani) is substantially similar to this bill, but also addresses the crime of grand theft from the person. Analysis Prepared by:Pedro R. Reyes / APPR. / (916) 319-2081