AB 168,
as amended, Maienschein. begin deleteLocal government finance. end deletebegin insertMental health: community-based services.end insert
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law provides for a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program and provides for specified services, including various mental health services. Existing federal law, the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, requires the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to, among other things, select, no later than September 1, 2017, among those states awarded a planning grant to participate in a time-limited demonstration program that is designed to improve access to community mental health and substance use treatment services provided by certified community behavioral health clinics.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would require the department to develop and submit a proposal to the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to be selected as a participating state in the time-limited demonstration program described above to receive enhanced federal matching funds for mental health services provided by certified community behavioral health clinics to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. The bill would require the department to work with counties and other stakeholders in developing its proposal for participation in the demonstration program. The bill would also require the department to include in its proposal a requirement that a county shall not be selected to participate in the demonstration program unless the county includes plans to redirect a portion of the funds currently used to match federal funds to provide increased housing opportunities for individuals with severe mental illnesses, as specified.
end insertExisting law generally requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenues to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction’s portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires a county auditor to make certain property tax revenue allocations to qualifying cities, as defined, in accordance with a specified Tax Equity Allocation formula, and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county. Existing law also requires the county auditor, in the case in which a qualifying city becomes the successor agency to a special district as a result of a merger with that district as described in a specified statute, to additionally allocate to that successor qualifying city that amount of property tax revenue that otherwise would have been allocated to that special district pursuant to general allocation requirements.
end deleteThis bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provision pertaining to property tax revenue allocations to a qualifying city that merges with a special district.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares the following:
end insertbegin insert
2(a) In 2014 Congress enacted the federal Protecting Access to
3Medicare Act of 2014.
P3 1(b) Under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, eight states
2will be selected to have their federal share of costs increased to
390 percent for two years for outpatient behavioral health care for
4individuals with severe mental illnesses or serious emotional
5disturbances.
6(c) If
successful, this federal opportunity would enable
7California to serve the tens of thousands of individuals with those
8conditions that it now lacks the funding to serve.
9(d) A major challenge in serving that population is that many
10are homeless and in need of housing assistance. Federal funding
11cannot pay for that housing assistance.
12(e) This federal funding would free up nearly $2 billion in county
13funds now being used to match federal funds. The money that is
14currently being used to match federal funds will now be available
15to be used to meet the housing needs of those individuals who are
16not currently receiving the behavioral health care that they need.
17(f) In October 2015, the United States Secretary of
Health and
18Human Services awarded California a planning grant pursuant
19to Section 223 of the federal Protecting Access to Medicare Act
20of 2014 to support California in, among other things, developing
21its proposal to participate in the two-year demonstration program.
begin insertSection 14021.2 is added to the end insertbegin insertWelfare and Institutions
23Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
(a) The department shall develop and submit a
25proposal to the United States Secretary of Health and Human
26Services for selection as a participating state in the time-limited
27demonstration program pursuant to Section 223 of the federal
28Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-93)
29in order to improve mental health services furnished by certified
30community behavioral health clinics to Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
31(b) In planning to develop its proposal for the demonstration
32program, the department shall work with counties and other
33stakeholders to identify the unmet need for the covered services
34and to estimate the number of individuals who will need housing
35assistance.
36(c) The proposal shall require that counties shall not be selected
37to participate in the demonstration program unless they include
38plans to redirect a portion of the funds that are currently used to
39match federal funds but will not be needed for that purpose during
P4 1the demonstration period to provide increased housing
2opportunities for individuals with severe mental illnesses.
Section 96.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
4 is amended to read:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,
6if a qualifying city, as defined by subdivision (d) of Section 98 or
7subdivision (f) of Section
98.02, becomes the successor agency to
8a special district as a result of a merger described in Section
957087.3 of the Government Code, the auditor shall allocate to that
10qualifying city, in addition to any other amount of ad valorem
11property tax revenue required to be allocated to that city pursuant
12to this chapter, the amount of ad valorem property tax revenue that
13otherwise would be allocated to that district pursuant to this article.
14(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to
15confirm and clarify a county auditor’s duty and authority,
16established by subdivision (d) of Section 57087.3 of the
17Government Code, to allocate to a qualifying city the ad valorem
18property tax revenue of a subsidiary district that has been merged
19with the city.
O
98