BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 168 Page 1 Date of Hearing: January 12, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Rob Bonta, Chair AB 168 (Maienschein) - As Amended January 4, 2016 SUBJECT: Mental health: community-based services. SUMMARY: Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to develop and submit a proposal to participate in a demonstration project authorized under the U.S. Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 to improve mental health services provided by certified community behavioral health clinics to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Requires DHCS to work with counties and other stakeholders to identify unmet needs for the covered services and estimate the number of individuals who will need housing services. Requires the grant application to include plans for counties to redirect a portion of the funds that are currently used to match federal funds but will not be needed for that purpose during the grant period to provide increased housing opportunities for individuals with severe mental illnesses. EXISTING FEDERAL LAW: 1)Authorizes the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act AB 168 Page 2 (ACA) to increase access to health care through an expansion of Medicaid (Medi-Cal in California) eligibility, subsidizing insurance premiums, and setting aside funds for health promotion and disease prevention, among others. 2)Authorizes the Protecting Access to Medicare Act (H.R. 4302) to establish an eight-state demonstration project that creates criteria for "Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics" (CCBHCs), entities designed to serve individuals with serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders. 3)Provides $25 million that will be available to states as planning grants to develop applications to participate in the two-year pilot. EXISTING STATE LAW: 1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by DHCS, which provides comprehensive health benefits to low-income children, their parents or caretaker relatives, pregnant women, elderly, blind or disabled persons, nursing home residents, and refugees who meet specified eligibility criteria. 2)Establishes, under the terms of a federal Medicaid waiver, a managed care program providing Medi-Cal specialty mental health services for eligible low-income persons administered through local county mental health plans under contract with the state. FISCAL EFFECT: This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal committee. 1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, federal law enables successful states to nearly double federal funds to support community mental health and alcohol and drug services AB 168 Page 3 with no additional costs to the state or county. These additional funds will significantly help California's counties serve more people who are homeless due to an untreated mental illness and get them off the streets, out of hospitals and jails, and into treatment. The author states that if California is successful in its bid for the additional funding, it would benefit the state to the tune of about $2 billion. The savings to the counties will free up Proposition 63 funds and other county mental health funds that are now expended on hospital care. The author concludes that those savings can then be redirected to supportive housing efforts which will help make the effects of these dollars more permanent. 2)BACKGROUND. a) Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics. On March 31, 2014, Congress passed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, which included $25 million for a two year, eight state demonstration program aimed at increasing Americans' access to community mental health and substance use treatment services while improving Medicaid reimbursement for these services. The Act established criteria for CCBHCs when serving individuals with serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders that provide intensive, person-centered, multidisciplinary, evidence-based screening, assessment, diagnostics, treatment, prevention, and wellness services. The U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary is directed to establish a process for selecting states to participate in this pilot. The Act establishes the match rate for CCBHC services as either the Enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Program (FMAP)/Children's Health Insurance Program rate or, for newly eligible "expansion" Medicaid beneficiaries, the current FMAP for that population - which is 100% now and AB 168 Page 4 moves down to 90% by 2020. Participating states must develop a prospective payment system for reimbursing CCBHCs for required services provided by these entities. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is currently in the process of determining what the eligibility criteria will be for the CCBHCs. CCBHCs cannot refuse service to any person based either on ability to pay or residence. This requirement, together with the fact that improving access to and the quality of health care for the Medicaid population may also positively affect the health of others, means that the CCBHC demonstration program may have long-lasting and beneficial effects beyond the realm of Medicaid enrollees. Authorized under Section 223 of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, the planning grants are part of a comprehensive effort to integrate behavioral health with physical health care, utilize evidence-based practices on a more consistent basis, and improve access to high quality care. The planning grants will be used to support states to certify community behavioral health clinics, solicit input from stakeholders, establish prospective payment systems for demonstration reimbursable services, and prepare an application to participate in the demonstration program. On October 19, 2015, the SAMHSA, in conjunction with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Assistant Secretary of Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), awarded a total of $22.9 million in planning grants for CCBHCs. Planning grants were awarded to 24 states, including California, to support efforts to improve behavioral health of their citizens by providing community-based mental health and substance use disorder treatment. California received a planning grant that totaled just under $1 million. b) Proposition 63. Proposition 63 was passed by voters in November 2004. The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) AB 168 Page 5 imposes a 1% income tax on personal income in excess of $1 million and creates a 16 member Commission charged with overseeing the implementation of MHSA. i) Commission. MHSA requires each county mental health department to prepare and submit a three-year plan to DHCS that must be updated each year and approved by DHCS after review and comment by the Commission. In their three-year plans, counties are required to include a list of all programs for which MHSA funding is being requested and that identifies how the funds will be spent and which populations will be served. Counties must submit their plans for approval to the Commission before the counties may spend certain categories of funding. ii) Funding. The MHSA provides funding for programs within five components: (1) Community Services and Supports: Provides direct mental health services to the severely and seriously mentally ill, such as mental health treatment, cost of health care treatment, and housing supports. Regulation requires counties to direct the majority of its Community Services and Supports funds to FullService Partnerships (FSPs). FSPs are county coordinated plans, in collaboration with the client and the family to provide the full spectrum of community services. These services consist of mental health services and supports, such as peer support and c(2) risis intervention services; and nonmental health services and supports, such as food, clothing, housing, and the cost of medical treatment; (3) Prevention and Early Intervention: Provides services to mental health clients in order to help AB 168 Page 6 prevent mental illness from becoming severe and disabling; (4) Innovation: Provides services and approaches that are creative in an effort to address mental health clients' persistent issues, such as improving services for underserved or unserved populations within the community; (5) Capital Facilities and Technological Needs: Creates additional county infrastructure such as additional clinics and facilities and/or development of a technological infrastructure for the mental health system, such as electronic health records for mental health services; and, (6) Workforce Education and Training: Provides training for existing county mental health employees, outreach and recruitment to increase employment in the mental health system, and financial incentives to recruit or retain employees within the public mental health system. c) 2016 "No Place Like Home" Initiative. On January 4, 2016 the California State Senate announced a proposed legislative package intended to re-purposes $2 billion of Proposition 63 bond funds and leverage additional dollars from other local, state, and federal funding for purposes of providing housing for chronically homeless persons with mental illness. The initiative includes proposals to construct permanent supportive housing for chronically AB 168 Page 7 homeless persons with mental illness, provide $200 million over four years in shorter-term, rent subsidies while the permanent housing is constructed or rehabilitated and support for special housing programs that will assist families that are part of the child welfare system or are enrolled in California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) Housing Support Program. 3)RELATED LEGISLATION. AB 847 (Mullin) is substantially similar to this bill and is currently pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee. 4)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION. a) AB 2287 (Monning) of 2010 would have required the California Health and Human Services Agency to direct the appropriate state departments within the agency to apply for Community Transformation Grants under the ACA. AB 2287 died in the Senate Appropriations Committee. b) AB 861 (Maienschein) of 2015 would have required the DHCS to apply to the HHS Secretary for the planning grant awarded for the purpose of developing proposals to participate in demonstration programs to improve mental health services furnished by certified community behavioral health clinics to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. AB 861 was vetoed by Governor Brown. The Governor's veto message stated, "This bill would require the Department of Health Care Services to mandate counties, as a condition of participation in a federal behavioral health demonstration program, to redirect a portion of any local savings to AB 168 Page 8 increasing housing opportunities for individuals with severe mental illness. The department has not been awarded the federal grant nor approved as one of eight states to participate in the federal demonstration program. As such, this bill is premature." 5)Committee Comments. This bill is substantially similar to AB 861 (Maienschein) of 2015, which was vetoed, as noted in the veto message above, as being "premature". California has since applied for and been awarded the initial CCBHC planning grant, however it has not been awarded the eight-state demonstration grant, of which this bill is requiring DHCS to submit a proposal for. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support None on file. Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Paula Villescaz / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 AB 168 Page 9