Amended in Assembly March 17, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 171


Introduced by Assembly Member Irwin

(Coauthors: Assembly Members begin insertAchadjian, Alejo, Bloom, Bonilla, Brough, Brown, Chávez, Cooley, Cooper, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, end insertFrazier,begin insert end insertbegin insertGallagher, Gonzalez, Gray, Holden, Lackey, Linder, Low, Maienschein,end insert Mathis,begin delete and Salasend deletebegin insert Mayes, McCarty, Salas, Steinorth, Mark end insertbegin insertStone, and Woodend insert)

begin insert

(Coauthors: Senators Anderson, Bates, Berryhill, Fuller, Hueso, Huff, McGuire, Morrell, Nguyen, Pan, and Vidak)

end insert

January 22, 2015


An act to amend Section 972.1 of, and to add Section 972.3 to, the Military and Veterans Code, relating to veterans, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 171, as amended, Irwin. Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans’ services.

Existing law requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to disburse funds, appropriated to the department for the purpose of supporting county veterans service officers pursuant to the annual Budget Act, on a pro rata basis, to counties that comply with certain conditions.

This bill would continuously appropriate the sum of $5,600,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to fund the activities of county veterans service officers, as specified. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2016, to develop an allocation formula based upon performance standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county veterans service officers, and would require those continuously appropriated moneys to be allocated in accordance with that formula, as specified. The bill would also delete obsolete provisions and would make conforming changes.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Vote: 23. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(a) The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are creating an
4entirely new generation of veterans who may be eligible for federal
5veterans benefits because of their war service and their physical
6and mental conditions.

7(b) Californians make up to 10 percent of the federal military
8forces used in these conflicts. Furthermore, the California National
9Guard and California-based reserve units have contributed
10significantly to these current conflicts.

11(c) Many of these returning California veterans are not aware
12of the federal and state benefits that are available to them.

13(d) Additionally, it is estimated that in California there may be
14over two million veterans, and their widows or widowers, who are
15unaware that they may be eligible for pensions from the federal
16government based upon their, or their spouses’, past military
17service in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, or the Gulf War.

18(e) California’s county veterans service officers are the initial
19local point of contact for claimants accessing the United States
20Department of Veterans Affairs.

21(f) The costs of maintaining county veterans service officers
22are shared from county general funds and state reimbursement to
23the counties. In 1997, in order to track performance, the Legislature
24enacted and the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 608, enacted
25as Chapter 318 of the Statutes of 1997, which required the
26California Department of Veterans Affairs to annually report the
27amount of monetary benefits paid to veterans by the federal
28government that were attributable to the assistance of county
P3    1veterans service officers. Senate Bill 608 also required the
2Department of Finance to consider an increase in the annual budget
3for county veterans service officers of up to $5 million, if approved
4in the annual budget process. In 2009, the Legislature enacted and
5the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 419 enacted as Chapter
6183 of the Statutes of 2009, which raised this amount to $11
7million, if approved in the annual budget process.

8(g) As a result of this annual reporting, by the end of 2013, it
9had been determined that from 1995 to 2013, inclusive, the state
10had cumulatively budgeted $41.4 million for its share of the cost
11of the county veterans service officers. As a result of this
12investment, county veteran service officers were able to assist local
13veterans in obtaining $4.1 billion, in new federal moneys. This is
14a return of about $98 for every $1 the state allocates to county
15veterans service officers. Furthermore, the $4.1 billion only reflects
16the actual monetary benefits qualified for in a given year. The
17monetary benefits qualified for in prior years are not tracked, yet
18the veterans and their dependents may continue to receive those
19benefits for the rest of their lives. Added to this stellar return on
20the state’s investment, but not counted in the annual reporting, are
21the Medi-Cal cost avoidance savings incurred as a result of county
22veterans service officers qualifying and shifting veterans away
23from Medi-Cal and into the appropriate federal veterans program.

24(h) The county veterans service officers had accomplished all
25of this without ever reaching the allowable state budget allocation
26of $11 million, set in 2009. To date, the county veterans service
27officers have not received more than $5.6 million per year from
28the state.

29(i) It is critical that the county veterans service officers receive
30a steady stream of funding because there continues to be a large
31number of underserved veterans and their dependents who are not
32aware of the federal benefits available to them as a result of their
33military service. Studies from other states have shown that
34increases in county veterans service officers have resulted in larger
35amounts of federal moneys to veterans. These new federal moneys
36and benefits are paid directly from the United States Department
37of Veterans Affairs to the qualifying veteran or their dependent
38and are used in the local economy.

P4    1

SEC. 2.  

Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as
2amended by Section 3 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is
3amended to read:

4

972.1.  

(a) Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro
5rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county
6veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and
7workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula
8based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department
9of Veterans Affairs for these purposes.

10(1) For the purposes of this section, “workload unit” means a
11specific claim activity that is used to allocate subvention funds to
12counties, which is approved by the department, and performed by
13county veterans service officers.

14(2) For the purposes of this subdivision, the department, by June
1530, 2013, shall develop a performance-based formula that will
16incentivize county veterans service officers to perform workload
17units that help veterans access federal compensation and pension
18benefits and other benefits, in order to maximize the amount of
19federal money received by California veterans.

20(b) The department shall annually determine the amount of new
21or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the
22federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans
23service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of
24each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding
25fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The
26Department of Finance shall review the department’s determination
27in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the
28budget of the department for the next fiscal year.

29(c) The department shall conduct a review of the
30high-performing and low-performing county veterans service
31begin deleteofficersend deletebegin insert officers,end insert and based on this review, shall produce a
32best-practices manual for county veterans service officers by June
3330, 2013.

34(d) The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and
35reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for
36county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million
37dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to
38the state’s veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.

39(e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016,
40and as of that date is repealed.

P5    1

SEC. 3.  

Section 972.1 of the Military and Veterans Code, as
2amended by Section 2 of Chapter 401 of the Statutes of 2012, is
3amended to read:

4

972.1.  

(a) Funds shall be disbursed each fiscal year on a pro
5rata basis to counties that have established and maintain a county
6veterans service officer in accordance with the staffing level and
7workload of each county veterans service officer under a formula
8based upon performance that shall be developed by the Department
9of Veterans Affairs for these purposes, and that shall allocate
10county funds in any fiscal year for county veterans service officers
11in an amount not less than five million six hundred thousand dollars
12($5,600,000).

13(b) The department shall annually determine the amount of new
14or increased monetary benefits paid to eligible veterans by the
15federal government attributable to the assistance of county veterans
16service officers. The department shall, on or before October 1 of
17each year, prepare and transmit its determination for the preceding
18fiscal year to the Department of Finance and the Legislature. The
19Department of Finance shall review the department’s determination
20in time to use the information in the annual Budget Act for the
21budget of the department for the next fiscal year.

22(c) The Legislature finds and declares that it is an efficient and
23reasonable use of state funds to increase the annual budget for
24county veterans service officers up to a total of eleven million
25dollars ($11,000,000) if it is justified by the monetary benefits to
26the state’s veterans attributable to the effort of these officers.

27(d) This section shall become operative January 1, 2016.

28

SEC. 4.  

Section 972.3 is added to the Military and Veterans
29Code
, to read:

30

972.3.  

(a) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government
31Code, the sum of five million six hundred thousand dollars
32($5,600,000) is hereby continuously appropriated from the General
33Fund each fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015, to the Department
34of Veterans Affairs to be available for allocation to counties to
35fund the activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to
36subdivision (a) of Section 972.1.

37(b) The Department of Veterans Affairs shall, no later than July
381, 2016, develop an allocation formula based upon performance
39standards that encourage innovation and reward outstanding service
40by county veterans service officers. Moneys appropriated for this
P6    1purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year in accordance with that
2formula among those counties that have established and maintained
3a county veterans service officer pursuant to Section 970.

4

SEC. 5.  

This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
5immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
6the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
7immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:

8Approximately 50 percent of the current General Fund
9appropriation in support of county veteran service offices
10operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for
11continuity of services critical to the successful reintegration of
12California’s veterans, to increase California’s utilization of veteran
13benefits, and to ensure veteran’s claims for benefits are processed
14in a timely manner, it is necessary that this act take effect
15immediately.



O

    98