BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 171


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          171 (Irwin)


          As Amended  May 28, 2015


          2/3 vote.  Urgency


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+--------------------|
          |Veterans        |9-0   |Irwin, Mathis,      |                    |
          |Affairs         |      |Alejo, Brough,      |                    |
          |                |      |Brown, Chávez,      |                    |
          |                |      |Daly, Frazier,      |                    |
          |                |      |Salas               |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,     |                    |
          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,    |                    |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly,        |                    |
          |                |      |Eggman, Gallagher,  |                    |
          |                |      |Eduardo Garcia,     |                    |
          |                |      |Gordon, Holden,     |                    |
          |                |      |Jones, Quirk,       |                    |
          |                |      |Rendon, Wagner,     |                    |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood         |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          SUMMARY:  Appropriates money to the California Department of  








                                                                       AB 171


                                                                      Page  2





          Veterans Affairs (CDVA) for allocation to the County Veterans  
          Service Officers (CVSOs) as specified.  There are currently two  
          Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1; one is applicable until  
          the end of 2015, another applies January 1, 2016.  As to the  
          current section, this bill deletes language pertaining to a  
          $500,000 appropriation and other obsolete references that would  
          conflict with the intent to raise the annual appropriation to $5.6  
          million dollars.  Specifically, this bill:  


          1)As to the Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1 taking effect  
            January 1, 2016, deletes conflicting or obsolete references and  
            raises the annual appropriation minimum to $5.6 million. 
          2)Adds Military and Veterans Code Section 972.3.  This new  
            section:


             a)   Appropriates $5.6 million annually from the General Fund  
               (GF) to CDVA for allocation to counties to fund the  
               activities of county veterans service officers pursuant to  
               Military and Veterans Code Section 972.1(a).
             b)   Clarifies that this money shall only be available for  
               encumbrance and expenditure for one year from the date upon  
               which it first becomes available for encumbrance.


             c)   Directs the CDVA to, no later than July 1, 2016, develop  
               an allocation formula based upon performance standards that  
               encourage innovation and reward outstanding service by county  
               veterans service officers.  Moneys appropriated for this  
               purpose shall be allocated each fiscal year (FY) in  
               accordance with that formula among those counties that have  
               established and maintained a county veterans service officer  
               pursuant to Military and Veterans Code Section 970.


             d)   Contains an urgency clause.  The basis for the urgency is  
               stated as: "Approximately 50 percent of the current GF  
               appropriation in support of county veteran service offices  








                                                                       AB 171


                                                                      Page  3





               operations expires on June 30, 2015. In order to provide for  
               continuity of services critical to the successful  
               reintegration of California's veterans, to increase  
               California's utilization of veteran benefits, and to ensure  
               veteran's claims for benefits are processed in a timely  
               manner, it is necessary that this act take effect  
               immediately."


          


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee: 


          1)The Governor's Budget proposes a $2.6 million GF appropriation  
            to the CDVA for allocation to the CVSOs in 2015-16.  Assuming  
            this amount was approved and was the same every year thereafter,  
            the annual impact of this bill will be an additional $3 million  
            GF cost.   


          2)Minor one-time costs to the CDVA to develop an allocation  
            formula.


          3)Unknown savings to various state programs if the CVSOs are able  
            to transfer participants from state programs to appropriate  
            federal veterans programs.


          The additional work by CVSOs may result in additional federal  
          payments to California veterans.


          COMMENTS:  CVSOs are local agencies established in 1946 to assist  
          veterans and their families in obtaining benefits and services  
          accrued through military service.  They act as the department's  








                                                                       AB 171


                                                                      Page  4





          network for claim initiation and development and draw down  
          significant federal dollars annually.  


          The cost of maintaining a CVSO is primarily a county general fund  
          expense; however, counties with an established CVSO receive some  
          State reimbursement funds as authorized by the California Military  
          and Veterans Code.  Depending on the revenue source, these funds  
          are distributed either based on specific performance measurements  
          or as a percentage of net county cost.  It is important to  
          emphasize that while state general funds and federal pass-through  
          funds distributed by the CDVA assists counties in maintaining  
          their CVSOs, the primary cost of the CVSO program statewide is a  
          county expense, as opposed to a State expense.  Funds received by  
          CVSOs are subject to both internal county audits and regular  
          audits by the CDVA in accordance with the California Code of  
          Regulations. 


          According to the California Association of County Veterans Service  
          Officers 2015 Annual Report and Directory, in FY 2013-14, when  
          CVSO state local assistance funding was temporarily increased from  
          $2.6 million to $5.6 million, the CVSO's were able to increase  
          federal benefits to California veterans by over $100 million. 


          The total state audited amount of federal compensation and pension  
          payments to veterans and their families rose from $445 million in  
          FY 2012-13 to $545 million in FY 2013-14.  The majority of those  
          payments are paid monthly to the veteran over his or her lifetime.


          California's Utilization of Veteran Benefits 


          California's utilization of the primary monetary veteran benefits,  
          referred to as compensation and pension (C&P), has historically  
          lagged behind the nation as a whole.  Recently, however,  
          California has improved its utilization rates though there is  








                                                                       AB 171


                                                                      Page  5





          still work to be done. 


          In 2007 CDVA recommended several strategies to correct the  
          underutilization including: 


            ?providing resources in support of additional full time  
            professional service representative staff with a focus on  
            areas with large veteran population and lower than average  
            benefit participation rates. 


             a)   Subvention funding for county veteran service offices  
               should be increased to support an expansion of county  
               veterans service office staffing.  The additional  
               funding shall be directed to expanding the staff  
               dedicated to full time outreach and claims work.
             b)   Resources are needed to fund additional professional  
               service representative staff at CalVet district offices  
               in support of claims representation (appeals), local  
               training, and local outreach.  Outreach should  
               specifically increase in areas where the State can  
               provide economy of scale. 


          Currently subvention funding in support of CVSO operations is  
          temporarily at $5.6 million but is scheduled to revert to the  
          historic level of $2.6 million unless action is taken to set a new  
          minimum funding level.  Many counties used this temporary increase  
          to add additional staff but also report that those positions are  
          temporary and most will be eliminated if the funding is not made  
          permanent. 




          Analysis Prepared by:                     John Spangler / V.A. /  
                          (916) 319-3550                                      








                                                                       AB 171


                                                                      Page  6





                                                                              
                                                                              
                FN: 0000700