AB 183,
as amended, Waldron. begin deleteLocal government finance. end deletebegin insertFinancial institutions: preauthorized electronic fund transfers.end insert
Existing federal and state laws regulate certain aspects of electronic fund transfers, including, but not limited to, preauthorized electronic fund transfers from or to a consumer’s checking account. Existing law requires the Department of Business Oversight to regulate various financial institutions operating within the state, including, but not limited to, banks and credit unions.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would require a financial institution subject to oversight by the Department of Business Oversight to ensure it complies with a specific federal regulation with regard to electronic fund transfers. This bill would require a financial institution to provide a specified written notice to a consumer, who approved a preauthorized electronic fund transfer to a merchant from the consumer’s account, and would further require a merchant located in the state that accepts preauthorized electronic fund transfers to post the same notice on its Internet Web site, if any. This bill would require a financial institution, upon written notification from a consumer who terminated a preauthorized electronic fund transfer with a merchant, within 7 business days, to take action to ensure that the merchant no longer has the ability to withdraw funds from the consumer’s account, based upon the consumer’s instructions. This bill would prohibit a merchant from requiring payment for goods or services in the form of a preauthorized electronic fund transfer from a consumer’s account at a financial institution, and would require a merchant to notify a financial institution, and cease making demands on a consumer’s account, when the consumer’s debt, payable by a preauthorized electronic fund transfer, has been satisfied.
end insertExisting law generally requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenues to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction’s portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires a county auditor to make certain property tax revenue allocations to “qualifying cities,” as defined, in accordance with a specified Tax Equity Allocation formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county. Existing law also requires the county auditor, in the case in which a “qualifying city” becomes the successor agency to a special district as a result of a merger with that district as described in a specified statute, to additionally allocate to that successor qualifying city that amount of property tax revenue that otherwise would have been allocated to that special district pursuant to general allocation requirements.
end deleteThis bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the provision pertaining to property tax revenue allocations to a qualifying city that merges with a special district.
end deleteVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 4150 is added to the end insertbegin insertFinancial Codeend insertbegin insert, to
2read:end insert
A financial institution subject to oversight by the
4Department of Business Oversight shall ensure it complies with
5Regulation E of the Federal Reserve Board (12 C.F.R. Pt. 205)
6with regard to electronic fund transfers, including, but not limited
P3 1to, preauthorized electronic fund transfers from or to a consumer’s
2checking account.
begin insertSection 4155 is added to the end insertbegin insertFinancial Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
begin insert(a) A financial institution shall provide the following
5written notice to a consumer who approved a preauthorized
6electronic fund transfer to a merchant from the consumer’s
7account:
| begin insert
(1) end insert | begin insert
If you want to stop the merchant’s ability to debit your account for future transactions, you should do all of the following: end insert |
|
| begin insert end insert | begin insert
(A) end insert | begin insert
Contact the merchant directly and revoke your authorization to charge your account. end insert |
| begin insert end insert | begin insert
(B) end insert | begin insert
Keep a copy of your notice revoking authorization to charge or obtain a cancellation number. end insert |
| begin insert end insert | begin insert
(C) end insert | begin insert
Notify your financial institution that the merchant no longer has authority to debit your account. It may be best to provide the notification in writing. end insert |
| begin insert
(2) end insert | begin insert
If you revoked authorization and the merchant continues to charge the account, you can dispute the transactions with your financial institution. In the event of a dispute, written proof that you had revoked the merchant’s authorization will prove beneficial. end insert |
|
| begin insert
(3) end insert | begin insert
If you authorized your financial institution to make the transfer to the merchant on your behalf, you need to revoke your authorization to make the transfer with your financial institution. Your financial institution may require you to inform the merchant of the revocation of authority in advance of the financial institution taking action. end insert |
|
28(b) A merchant located in the state that accepts a preauthorized
29electronic fund transfer from a consumer shall post the notice in
30subdivision (a) on its Internet Web site, if any.
begin insertSection 4160 is added to the end insertbegin insertFinancial Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
begin insert(a) Upon written notification from a consumer that he
33or she terminated a preauthorized electronic fund transfer from
34his or her account to a merchant, a financial institution shall,
35within seven business days, take action to ensure that the merchant
36no longer has the ability to withdraw funds from the account, based
37upon the consumer’s instructions.
38(b) Termination of the merchant’s ability to access a consumer’s
39account shall come without penalty to the consumer.
P4 1(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that this section ensure that
2consumers have control over their own accounts and funds that
3cannot be subordinated by a third party.
begin insertSection 4165 is added to the end insertbegin insertFinancial Codeend insertbegin insert, to read:end insert
begin insert(a) A merchant located in the state shall not require
6payment for goods or services in the form of a preauthorized
7electronic fund transfer from a consumer’s account at a financial
8institution.
9(b) A merchant located in the state shall notify a financial
10institution, and shall cease to make demands on a consumer’s
11account, when the consumer’s debt, payable by a preauthorized
12electronic fund transfer, has been satisfied.
Section 96.15 of the Revenue and Taxation Code
14 is amended to read:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,
16in the event a qualifying city as defined in subdivision (d) of
17Section 98 or subdivision (f) of Section 98.02 becomes the
18successor agency to a special district as a result of a merger
19described in Section 57087.3 of the Government Code, the auditor
20shall allocate to that qualifying city, in addition to any other amount
21of ad valorem property tax revenue required to be allocated to that
22city pursuant to this chapter, the amount of ad valorem property
23tax revenue that otherwise would be allocated to that district
24pursuant to this article.
25(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to
26confirm and clarify a county auditor’s duty and authority,
27
established
pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 57087.3 of the
28Government Code, to allocate to a qualifying city the ad valorem
29property tax revenue of a subsidiary district that has been merged
30with the city.
O
98